Fixes commit fa5afbbc20ef3577c5338f9d0b24dad45cef59cd,
due to lack of commit 534519f0514f52007d504e0f2eeb714de7b2468d.
Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
---
xen/include/xen/compiler.h | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/compiler.h b/xen/include/xen/compiler.h
index 85cbd1ab00..e2b7193042 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/compiler.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/compiler.h
@@ -99,6 +99,13 @@
__asm__ ("" : "=r"(__ptr) : "0"(ptr)); \
(typeof(ptr)) (__ptr + (off)); })
+#ifndef CONFIG_GCC_VERSION
+# ifdef __GNUC__
+# define CONFIG_GCC_VERSION (__GNUC__ * 10000 \
+ + __GNUC_MINOR__ * 100 \
+ + __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__)
+# endif
+#endif
#if CONFIG_GCC_VERSION >= 110000 /* See gcc bug 100680. */
# define gcc11_wrap(x) RELOC_HIDE(x, 0)
#else
On 18/06/2021 17:42, Olaf Hering wrote: > Fixes commit fa5afbbc20ef3577c5338f9d0b24dad45cef59cd, > due to lack of commit 534519f0514f52007d504e0f2eeb714de7b2468d. > > Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> Presumably you're intending this for Xen 4.13 and older? ~Andrew
Am Fri, 18 Jun 2021 17:46:47 +0100 schrieb Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>: > On 18/06/2021 17:42, Olaf Hering wrote: > > Fixes commit fa5afbbc20ef3577c5338f9d0b24dad45cef59cd, > > due to lack of commit 534519f0514f52007d504e0f2eeb714de7b2468d. > Presumably you're intending this for Xen 4.13 and older? 722f59d38c710a940ab05e542a83020eb5546dea without the required changes exists only in staging-4.13 at this point. Olaf
On 18.06.2021 18:55, Olaf Hering wrote: > Am Fri, 18 Jun 2021 17:46:47 +0100 > schrieb Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>: > >> On 18/06/2021 17:42, Olaf Hering wrote: >>> Fixes commit fa5afbbc20ef3577c5338f9d0b24dad45cef59cd, >>> due to lack of commit 534519f0514f52007d504e0f2eeb714de7b2468d. > >> Presumably you're intending this for Xen 4.13 and older? > > 722f59d38c710a940ab05e542a83020eb5546dea without the required changes exists only in staging-4.13 at this point. But please could you help readers by making this obvious without needing to check what branch(es) said commit is part of, e.g. by tagging the subject with [PATCH for-4.13] or some such? Jan
On 18.06.2021 18:42, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Fixes commit fa5afbbc20ef3577c5338f9d0b24dad45cef59cd,
> due to lack of commit 534519f0514f52007d504e0f2eeb714de7b2468d.
>
> Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
albeit ...
> --- a/xen/include/xen/compiler.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/compiler.h
> @@ -99,6 +99,13 @@
> __asm__ ("" : "=r"(__ptr) : "0"(ptr)); \
> (typeof(ptr)) (__ptr + (off)); })
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_GCC_VERSION
> +# ifdef __GNUC__
> +# define CONFIG_GCC_VERSION (__GNUC__ * 10000 \
> + + __GNUC_MINOR__ * 100 \
> + + __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__)
> +# endif
> +#endif
... I question the need for the surrounding #ifdef, and I may also move
this higher up in the file while committing.
Jan
On 18.06.2021 18:42, Olaf Hering wrote:
> --- a/xen/include/xen/compiler.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/compiler.h
> @@ -99,6 +99,13 @@
> __asm__ ("" : "=r"(__ptr) : "0"(ptr)); \
> (typeof(ptr)) (__ptr + (off)); })
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_GCC_VERSION
> +# ifdef __GNUC__
> +# define CONFIG_GCC_VERSION (__GNUC__ * 10000 \
> + + __GNUC_MINOR__ * 100 \
> + + __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__)
> +# endif
> +#endif
> #if CONFIG_GCC_VERSION >= 110000 /* See gcc bug 100680. */
> # define gcc11_wrap(x) RELOC_HIDE(x, 0)
> #else
Having thought about it, this feels like the wrong solution to
me: I'd rather not see us introduce further CONFIG_* which don't
really come from Kconfig. The more when we have an even simpler
alternative:
there's no CONFIG_GCC_VERSION
This was introduced in 4.14 only.
Reported-by: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
--- a/xen/include/xen/compiler.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/compiler.h
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
__asm__ ("" : "=r"(__ptr) : "0"(ptr)); \
(typeof(ptr)) (__ptr + (off)); })
-#if CONFIG_GCC_VERSION >= 110000 /* See gcc bug 100680. */
+#if __GNUC__ >= 11 /* See gcc bug 100680. */
# define gcc11_wrap(x) RELOC_HIDE(x, 0)
#else
# define gcc11_wrap(x) (x)
I'll also adjust the original backport itself before putting it
on the 4.12 branch (where I think we want both this and the other
gcc 11 fixes).
Jan
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.