On 01.02.21 15:07, Andrew Cooper wrote:
Hi Andrew
> On 01/02/2021 12:34, Oleksandr wrote:
>> On 30.01.21 04:58, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andrew
>>
>>> Combined series (as they are dependent). First, the resource size
>>> fixes, and
>>> then the external IPT monitoring built on top.
>>>
>>> Posting in full for reference, but several patches are ready to go
>>> in. Those
>>> in need of review are patch 6, 8 and 12.
>>>
>>> See individual patches for changes. The major work was rebasing over
>>> the
>>> ARM/IOREQ series which moved a load of code which this series was
>>> bugfixing.
>> Looks like that some of these patches have been already merged. So I
>> preliminary tested current staging
>> (9dc687f155a57216b83b17f9cde55dd43e06b0cd x86/debug: fix page-overflow
>> bug in dbg_rw_guest_mem) on Arm *with* IOREQ enabled.
>>
>> I didn't notice any regressions with IOREQ on Arm))
> Fantastic!
>
> Tamas and I did do extended testing on the subset which got committed,
> before it went in, and it is all fixing of corner cases, rather than
> fundamentally changing how things worked.
>
>
> One query I did leave on IRC, and hasn't had an answer.
>
> What is the maximum number of vcpus in an ARM guest?
public/arch-arm.h says that current supported guest VCPUs max number is
128.
> You moved an
> x86-ism "max 128 vcpus" into common code.
Ooh, I am not sure I understand where exactly. Could you please clarify
in which patch?
>
> ~Andrew
--
Regards,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko