On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 11:11:17PM -0800, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
> ---
> fs/iomap/direct-io.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> index f6c557a1bd25..0737192f7e5c 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> @@ -267,9 +267,8 @@ iomap_dio_bio_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - bio = bio_alloc(GFP_KERNEL, nr_pages);
> - bio_set_dev(bio, iomap->bdev);
> - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = iomap_sector(iomap, pos);
> + bio = bio_new(iomap->bdev, iomap_sector(iomap, pos), 0, 0,
> + nr_pages, GFP_KERNEL);
op == 0? It seems a little odd to me that we'd set the field to zero
and then construct bi_opf later.
It also strikes me as a little strange that bi_opf is combined from the
third and fourth parameters, but maybe some day you'll want to do some
parameter verification on debug kernels or something...?
--D
> bio->bi_write_hint = dio->iocb->ki_hint;
> bio->bi_ioprio = dio->iocb->ki_ioprio;
> bio->bi_private = dio;
> --
> 2.22.1
>