> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> Sent: 24 March 2020 09:39
> To: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>; George Dunlap
> <george.dunlap@citrix.com>; Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>; Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>;
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>; Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>; Stefano
> Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>; Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>; Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] make sure PGC_extra pages are dealt with properly
>
> On 18.03.2020 18:32, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > This series was formerly called "remove one more shared xenheap page:
> > shared_info" but I have dropped the patches actually changing shared_info
> > and just left the PGC_extra clean-up that was previously intertwined.
> >
> > Paul Durrant (3):
> > mm: keep PGC_extra pages on a separate list
> > x86 / ioreq: use a MEMF_no_refcount allocation for server pages...
> > mm: add 'is_special_page' inline function...
>
> So I'm confused - I had just replied twice to v6 patch 5/5. This
> series calls itself v4 and consists of the middle three patches
> of what v6 was. What's the deal? Is this really v7, and the two
> patches have been dropped / postponed?
Sorry, I clearly got confused with numbering against one of my other series. Yes, this should be v7.
I wanted to send the patches that clear up use of PGC_extra, separating from the change to shared_info since I'm pressed for time to complete all the other conversions from xenheap pages such that I can send them as a single series.
Paul
>
> Jan