drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com>
list_for_each_entry_rcu has built-in RCU and lock checking.
Pass cond argument to list_for_each_entry_rcu.
Signed-off-by: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c
index 10d580c3dea3..3f9783f70a75 100644
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c
+++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c
@@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ static void xenvif_add_hash(struct xenvif *vif, const u8 *tag,
found = false;
oldest = NULL;
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &vif->hash.cache.list, link) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &vif->hash.cache.list, link,
+ lockdep_is_held(&vif->hash.cache.lock)) {
/* Make sure we don't add duplicate entries */
if (entry->len == len &&
memcmp(entry->tag, tag, len) == 0)
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 07:48:40PM +0530, madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com wrote: > From: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com> > > list_for_each_entry_rcu has built-in RCU and lock checking. > Pass cond argument to list_for_each_entry_rcu. > > Signed-off-by: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com> You seem to have dropped the second hunk which modified xenvif_flush_hash, is that a mistake? Wei. > --- > drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c > index 10d580c3dea3..3f9783f70a75 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c > @@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ static void xenvif_add_hash(struct xenvif *vif, const u8 *tag, > > found = false; > oldest = NULL; > - list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &vif->hash.cache.list, link) { > + list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &vif->hash.cache.list, link, > + lockdep_is_held(&vif->hash.cache.lock)) { > /* Make sure we don't add duplicate entries */ > if (entry->len == len && > memcmp(entry->tag, tag, len) == 0) > -- > 2.17.1 > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 8:35 PM Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 07:48:40PM +0530, madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com > wrote: > > From: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com> > > > > list_for_each_entry_rcu has built-in RCU and lock checking. > > Pass cond argument to list_for_each_entry_rcu. > > > > Signed-off-by: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com> > > You seem to have dropped the second hunk which modified > xenvif_flush_hash, is that a mistake? > I am sorry again, Yes I forgot to add the second hunk. I will send the final patch with both the hunks in a while. Thank you, Madhuparna Wei. > > > --- > > drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c > b/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c > > index 10d580c3dea3..3f9783f70a75 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c > > @@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ static void xenvif_add_hash(struct xenvif *vif, const > u8 *tag, > > > > found = false; > > oldest = NULL; > > - list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &vif->hash.cache.list, link) { > > + list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &vif->hash.cache.list, link, > > + lockdep_is_held(&vif->hash.cache.lock)) { > > /* Make sure we don't add duplicate entries */ > > if (entry->len == len && > > memcmp(entry->tag, tag, len) == 0) > > -- > > 2.17.1 > > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.