drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com>
list_for_each_entry_rcu has built-in RCU and lock checking.
Pass cond argument to list_for_each_entry_rcu.
Signed-off-by: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c
index 10d580c3dea3..3f9783f70a75 100644
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c
+++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c
@@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ static void xenvif_add_hash(struct xenvif *vif, const u8 *tag,
found = false;
oldest = NULL;
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &vif->hash.cache.list, link) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &vif->hash.cache.list, link,
+ lockdep_is_held(&vif->hash.cache.lock)) {
/* Make sure we don't add duplicate entries */
if (entry->len == len &&
memcmp(entry->tag, tag, len) == 0)
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 07:48:40PM +0530, madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com>
>
> list_for_each_entry_rcu has built-in RCU and lock checking.
> Pass cond argument to list_for_each_entry_rcu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com>
You seem to have dropped the second hunk which modified
xenvif_flush_hash, is that a mistake?
Wei.
> ---
> drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c
> index 10d580c3dea3..3f9783f70a75 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c
> @@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ static void xenvif_add_hash(struct xenvif *vif, const u8 *tag,
>
> found = false;
> oldest = NULL;
> - list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &vif->hash.cache.list, link) {
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &vif->hash.cache.list, link,
> + lockdep_is_held(&vif->hash.cache.lock)) {
> /* Make sure we don't add duplicate entries */
> if (entry->len == len &&
> memcmp(entry->tag, tag, len) == 0)
> --
> 2.17.1
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 8:35 PM Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 07:48:40PM +0530, madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > From: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com>
> >
> > list_for_each_entry_rcu has built-in RCU and lock checking.
> > Pass cond argument to list_for_each_entry_rcu.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com>
>
> You seem to have dropped the second hunk which modified
> xenvif_flush_hash, is that a mistake?
>
I am sorry again, Yes I forgot to add the second hunk.
I will send the final patch with both the hunks in a while.
Thank you,
Madhuparna
Wei.
>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c
> b/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c
> > index 10d580c3dea3..3f9783f70a75 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c
> > @@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ static void xenvif_add_hash(struct xenvif *vif, const
> u8 *tag,
> >
> > found = false;
> > oldest = NULL;
> > - list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &vif->hash.cache.list, link) {
> > + list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &vif->hash.cache.list, link,
> > + lockdep_is_held(&vif->hash.cache.lock)) {
> > /* Make sure we don't add duplicate entries */
> > if (entry->len == len &&
> > memcmp(entry->tag, tag, len) == 0)
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.