Some of the function generating nodes (e.g make_timer_node)
take in a dt_device_node parameter, but never used it.
It is actually misused when creating DT for DomU.
So it is the best to remove the parameter.
Suggested-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viktor Mitin <viktor_mitin@epam.com>
---
xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
index d9836779d1..7fb828cae2 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
@@ -742,8 +742,7 @@ static int __init make_hypervisor_node(struct domain *d,
return res;
}
-static int __init make_psci_node(void *fdt,
- const struct dt_device_node *parent)
+static int __init make_psci_node(void *fdt)
{
int res;
const char compat[] =
@@ -779,8 +778,7 @@ static int __init make_psci_node(void *fdt,
return res;
}
-static int __init make_cpus_node(const struct domain *d, void *fdt,
- const struct dt_device_node *parent)
+static int __init make_cpus_node(const struct domain *d, void *fdt)
{
int res;
const struct dt_device_node *cpus = dt_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
@@ -962,8 +960,7 @@ static int __init make_gic_node(const struct domain *d, void *fdt,
return res;
}
-static int __init make_timer_node(const struct domain *d, void *fdt,
- const struct dt_device_node *node)
+static int __init make_timer_node(const struct domain *d, void *fdt)
{
static const struct dt_device_match timer_ids[] __initconst =
{
@@ -1380,7 +1377,7 @@ static int __init handle_node(struct domain *d, struct kernel_info *kinfo,
if ( device_get_class(node) == DEVICE_GIC )
return make_gic_node(d, kinfo->fdt, node);
if ( dt_match_node(timer_matches, node) )
- return make_timer_node(d, kinfo->fdt, node);
+ return make_timer_node(d, kinfo->fdt);
/* Skip nodes used by Xen */
if ( dt_device_used_by(node) == DOMID_XEN )
@@ -1454,11 +1451,11 @@ static int __init handle_node(struct domain *d, struct kernel_info *kinfo,
if ( res )
return res;
- res = make_psci_node(kinfo->fdt, node);
+ res = make_psci_node(kinfo->fdt);
if ( res )
return res;
- res = make_cpus_node(d, kinfo->fdt, node);
+ res = make_cpus_node(d, kinfo->fdt);
if ( res )
return res;
@@ -1713,11 +1710,11 @@ static int __init prepare_dtb_domU(struct domain *d, struct kernel_info *kinfo)
if ( ret )
goto err;
- ret = make_psci_node(kinfo->fdt, NULL);
+ ret = make_psci_node(kinfo->fdt);
if ( ret )
goto err;
- ret = make_cpus_node(d, kinfo->fdt, NULL);
+ ret = make_cpus_node(d, kinfo->fdt);
if ( ret )
goto err;
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Hi Viktor, On 6/18/19 9:58 AM, Viktor Mitin wrote: > Some of the function generating nodes (e.g make_timer_node) > take in a dt_device_node parameter, but never used it. > It is actually misused when creating DT for DomU. > So it is the best to remove the parameter. > > Suggested-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Viktor Mitin <viktor_mitin@epam.com> Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Hi Julien, I've checked latest Xen staging, the patch has not been integrated yet. Please integrate the patch if no objections. Thanks On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:12 PM Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> wrote: > > Hi Viktor, > > On 6/18/19 9:58 AM, Viktor Mitin wrote: > > Some of the function generating nodes (e.g make_timer_node) > > take in a dt_device_node parameter, but never used it. > > It is actually misused when creating DT for DomU. > > So it is the best to remove the parameter. > > > > Suggested-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> > > Signed-off-by: Viktor Mitin <viktor_mitin@epam.com> > > Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> > > Cheers, > > -- > Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
On 18/07/2019 14:18, Viktor Mitin wrote: > Hi Julien, Hi, > > I've checked latest Xen staging, the patch has not been integrated yet. > Please integrate the patch if no objections. Done now. Sorry for the delay. Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.