[Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: fix regression introduced in 5c883cf036cf

Wei Liu posted 1 patch 4 years, 11 months ago
Failed in applying to current master (apply log)
tools/libxl/libxl_device.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: fix regression introduced in 5c883cf036cf
Posted by Wei Liu 4 years, 11 months ago
Two lines were erroneously deleted during rebase which caused domain
destruction to fail.

Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
---
Sorry my usual test script failed to catch this.
---
 tools/libxl/libxl_device.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_device.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_device.c
index f8340ba815..db6c0203b7 100644
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_device.c
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_device.c
@@ -734,6 +734,11 @@ int libxl__device_destroy(libxl__gc *gc, libxl__device *dev)
     uint32_t domid;
     int libxl_only = dev->backend_kind == LIBXL__DEVICE_KIND_NONE;
 
+    if (!libxl_only) {
+        be_path = libxl__device_backend_path(gc, dev);
+        fe_path = libxl__device_frontend_path(gc, dev);
+    }
+
     rc = libxl__get_domid(gc, &domid);
     if (rc) goto out;
 
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: fix regression introduced in 5c883cf036cf
Posted by Juergen Gross 4 years, 11 months ago
On 16/05/2019 11:11, Wei Liu wrote:
> Two lines were erroneously deleted during rebase which caused domain
> destruction to fail.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>

Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>


Juergen

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: fix regression introduced in 5c883cf036cf
Posted by Ian Jackson 4 years, 11 months ago
Wei Liu writes ("[PATCH] libxl: fix regression introduced in 5c883cf036cf"):
> Two lines were erroneously deleted during rebase which caused domain
> destruction to fail.

I have taken this as a sign that I should have properly reviewed what
became 5c883cf036cf.

Having done so I have also spotted that:

The newly introduced ERROR_FAIL returns in libxl should be ERROR_NI
("not implemented").

But I didn't see anything else, other than the rebase error that you
are fixing now.  So for this patch:

Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel