The condition in xen_swiotlb_free_coherent() for deciding whether to
call xen_destroy_contiguous_region() is wrong: in case the region to
be freed is not contiguous calling xen_destroy_contiguous_region() is
the wrong thing to do: it would result in inconsistent mappings of
multiple PFNs to the same MFN. This will lead to various strange
crashes or data corruption.
Instead of calling xen_destroy_contiguous_region() in that case a
warning should be issued as that situation should never occur.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
---
drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
index 877baf2a94f4..42a3924e6d91 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
@@ -360,8 +360,8 @@ xen_swiotlb_free_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size, void *vaddr,
/* Convert the size to actually allocated. */
size = 1UL << (order + XEN_PAGE_SHIFT);
- if (((dev_addr + size - 1 <= dma_mask)) ||
- range_straddles_page_boundary(phys, size))
+ if ((dev_addr + size - 1 <= dma_mask) &&
+ !WARN_ON(range_straddles_page_boundary(phys, size)))
xen_destroy_contiguous_region(phys, order);
xen_free_coherent_pages(hwdev, size, vaddr, (dma_addr_t)phys, attrs);
--
2.16.4
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
>>> On 23.04.19 at 12:54, <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
> --- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> @@ -360,8 +360,8 @@ xen_swiotlb_free_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size, void *vaddr,
> /* Convert the size to actually allocated. */
> size = 1UL << (order + XEN_PAGE_SHIFT);
>
> - if (((dev_addr + size - 1 <= dma_mask)) ||
> - range_straddles_page_boundary(phys, size))
> + if ((dev_addr + size - 1 <= dma_mask) &&
> + !WARN_ON(range_straddles_page_boundary(phys, size)))
> xen_destroy_contiguous_region(phys, order);
On the allocation side we have
if (((dev_addr + size - 1 <= dma_mask)) &&
!range_straddles_page_boundary(phys, size))
*dma_handle = dev_addr;
else {
if (xen_create_contiguous_region(phys, order,
fls64(dma_mask), dma_handle) != 0) {
xen_free_coherent_pages(hwdev, size, ret, (dma_addr_t)phys, attrs);
return NULL;
}
}
which is (as far as the function call is concerned)
if ((dev_addr + size - 1 > dma_mask) ||
range_straddles_page_boundary(phys, size))
xen_create_contiguous_region(...);
So I don't think your transformation is correct. Even worse, both
parts of the condition in xen_swiotlb_free_coherent() act on an
address that is the _result_ of the prior
xen_create_contiguous_region(), i.e. the address should always
match _both_ criteria anyway. Whereas what you really want is
undo the xen_create_contiguous_region() only when it actually
was called. Otherwise you also shatter contiguous allocations
that were contiguous already for other reasons (perhaps just
luck).
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
On 4/23/19 6:54 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: > The condition in xen_swiotlb_free_coherent() for deciding whether to > call xen_destroy_contiguous_region() is wrong: in case the region to > be freed is not contiguous calling xen_destroy_contiguous_region() is > the wrong thing to do: it would result in inconsistent mappings of > multiple PFNs to the same MFN. This will lead to various strange > crashes or data corruption. > > Instead of calling xen_destroy_contiguous_region() in that case a > warning should be issued as that situation should never occur. > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.