From: Andrii Anisov <andrii_anisov@epam.com>
ARM's schedule_tail() is called from two places: context_switch() and
continue_new_vcpu(). Both functions are always called with
prev!=current. So replace the correspondent check in schedule_tail()
with ASSERT() which is the development (debug) build guard.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Anisov <andrii_anisov@epam.com>
---
xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
index 6dc633e..721d40e 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
@@ -305,6 +305,8 @@ static void update_runstate_area(struct vcpu *v)
static void schedule_tail(struct vcpu *prev)
{
+ ASSERT(prev != current);
+
ctxt_switch_from(prev);
ctxt_switch_to(current);
@@ -313,8 +315,7 @@ static void schedule_tail(struct vcpu *prev)
context_saved(prev);
- if ( prev != current )
- update_runstate_area(current);
+ update_runstate_area(current);
/* Ensure that the vcpu has an up-to-date time base. */
update_vcpu_system_time(current);
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 12:59 +0300, Andrii Anisov wrote: > From: Andrii Anisov <andrii_anisov@epam.com> > > ARM's schedule_tail() is called from two places: context_switch() and > continue_new_vcpu(). Both functions are always called with > prev!=current. So replace the correspondent check in schedule_tail() > with ASSERT() which is the development (debug) build guard. > > Signed-off-by: Andrii Anisov <andrii_anisov@epam.com> > FWIW, Reviewed-by: Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@suse.com> Thanks and Regards -- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D http://about.me/dario.faggioli Virtualization Software Engineer SUSE Labs, SUSE https://www.suse.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- <<This happens because _I_ choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Hi, On 08/05/2019 12:25, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 12:59 +0300, Andrii Anisov wrote: >> From: Andrii Anisov <andrii_anisov@epam.com> >> >> ARM's schedule_tail() is called from two places: context_switch() and >> continue_new_vcpu(). Both functions are always called with >> prev!=current. So replace the correspondent check in schedule_tail() >> with ASSERT() which is the development (debug) build guard. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrii Anisov <andrii_anisov@epam.com> >> > FWIW, > > Reviewed-by: Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@suse.com> Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> I have now committed the patch. Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.