[Stable-8.2.8 33/49] target/arm: Don't assert in regime_is_user() for E10 mmuidx values

Michael Tokarev posted 49 patches 2 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
[Stable-8.2.8 33/49] target/arm: Don't assert in regime_is_user() for E10 mmuidx values
Posted by Michael Tokarev 2 weeks ago
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

In regime_is_user() we assert if we're passed an ARMMMUIdx_E10_*
mmuidx value. This used to make sense because we only used this
function in ptw.c and would never use it on this kind of stage 1+2
mmuidx, only for an individual stage 1 or stage 2 mmuidx.

However, when we implemented FEAT_E0PD we added a callsite in
aa64_va_parameters(), which means this can now be called for
stage 1+2 mmuidx values if the guest sets the TCG_ELX.{E0PD0,E0PD1}
bits to enable use of the feature. This will then result in
an assertion failure later, for instance on a TLBI operation:

#6  0x00007ffff6d0e70f in g_assertion_message_expr
    (domain=0x0, file=0x55555676eeba "../../target/arm/internals.h", line=978, func=0x555556771d48 <__func__.5> "regime_is_user", expr=<optimised out>)
    at ../../../glib/gtestutils.c:3279
#7  0x0000555555f286d2 in regime_is_user (env=0x555557f2fe00, mmu_idx=ARMMMUIdx_E10_0) at ../../target/arm/internals.h:978
#8  0x0000555555f3e31c in aa64_va_parameters (env=0x555557f2fe00, va=18446744073709551615, mmu_idx=ARMMMUIdx_E10_0, data=true, el1_is_aa32=false)
    at ../../target/arm/helper.c:12048
#9  0x0000555555f3163b in tlbi_aa64_get_range (env=0x555557f2fe00, mmuidx=ARMMMUIdx_E10_0, value=106721347371041) at ../../target/arm/helper.c:5214
#10 0x0000555555f317e8 in do_rvae_write (env=0x555557f2fe00, value=106721347371041, idxmap=21, synced=true) at ../../target/arm/helper.c:5260
#11 0x0000555555f31925 in tlbi_aa64_rvae1is_write (env=0x555557f2fe00, ri=0x555557fbeae0, value=106721347371041) at ../../target/arm/helper.c:5302
#12 0x0000555556036f8f in helper_set_cp_reg64 (env=0x555557f2fe00, rip=0x555557fbeae0, value=106721347371041) at ../../target/arm/tcg/op_helper.c:965

Since we do know whether these mmuidx values are for usermode
or not, we can easily make regime_is_user() handle them:
ARMMMUIdx_E10_0 is user, and the other two are not.

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Fixes: e4c93e44ab103f ("target/arm: Implement FEAT_E0PD")
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20241017172331.822587-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
(cherry picked from commit 1505b651fdbd9af59a4a90876a62ae7ea2d4cd39)
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>

diff --git a/target/arm/internals.h b/target/arm/internals.h
index 0aa49a0b42..b93206f88f 100644
--- a/target/arm/internals.h
+++ b/target/arm/internals.h
@@ -752,6 +752,7 @@ static inline uint32_t regime_el(CPUARMState *env, ARMMMUIdx mmu_idx)
 static inline bool regime_is_user(CPUARMState *env, ARMMMUIdx mmu_idx)
 {
     switch (mmu_idx) {
+    case ARMMMUIdx_E10_0:
     case ARMMMUIdx_E20_0:
     case ARMMMUIdx_Stage1_E0:
     case ARMMMUIdx_MUser:
@@ -761,10 +762,6 @@ static inline bool regime_is_user(CPUARMState *env, ARMMMUIdx mmu_idx)
         return true;
     default:
         return false;
-    case ARMMMUIdx_E10_0:
-    case ARMMMUIdx_E10_1:
-    case ARMMMUIdx_E10_1_PAN:
-        g_assert_not_reached();
     }
 }
 
-- 
2.39.5