From: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>

We're missing a strace entry for riscv_hwprobe, and using -strace will
report it as "Unknown syscall 258".

After this patch we'll have:

$ ./build/qemu-riscv64 -strace test_mutex_riscv
110182 riscv_hwprobe(0x7f207efdc700,1,0,0,0,0) = 0
110182 brk(NULL) = 0x0000000000082000
(...)

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20250728170633.113384-1-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
(cherry picked from commit e111ffe48b29ca8abd450af9ee5dd71af3f93536)
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>

diff --git a/linux-user/strace.list b/linux-user/strace.list
index fdf94ef32a..ab818352a9 100644
--- a/linux-user/strace.list
+++ b/linux-user/strace.list
@@ -1716,3 +1716,6 @@
 { TARGET_NR_clock_gettime64, "clock_gettime64" , NULL, print_clock_gettime64,
                            print_syscall_ret_clock_gettime64 },
 #endif
+#ifdef TARGET_NR_riscv_hwprobe
+{ TARGET_NR_riscv_hwprobe, "riscv_hwprobe" , "%s(%p,%d,%d,%d,%d,%d)", NULL, NULL },
+#endif
-- 
2.47.2