The "2" in booke206_update_mas_tlb_miss() call corresponds to
MMU_INST_FETCH which is the value of access_type in this branch;
mmubooke206_esr() only checks for MMU_DATA_STORE and it's called from
code access so using MMU_DATA_LOAD here seems wrong so replace it with
access_type here as well that yields the same result. This also makes
these calls the same as the data access branch further down.

Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
 target/ppc/mmu_common.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
index f40481b4b1..6570b280ca 100644
--- a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
+++ b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
@@ -1287,13 +1287,13 @@ static bool ppc_jumbo_xlate(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr,
                 env->spr[SPR_40x_ESR] = 0x00000000;
                 break;
             case POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE206:
-                booke206_update_mas_tlb_miss(env, eaddr, 2, mmu_idx);
+                booke206_update_mas_tlb_miss(env, eaddr, access_type, mmu_idx);
                 /* fall through */
             case POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE:
                 cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ITLB;
                 env->error_code = 0;
                 env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DEAR] = eaddr;
-                env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = mmubooke206_esr(mmu_idx, MMU_DATA_LOAD);
+                env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = mmubooke206_esr(mmu_idx, access_type);
                 break;
             case POWERPC_MMU_REAL:
                 cpu_abort(cs, "PowerPC in real mode should never raise "
-- 
2.30.9