This patch reorganizes the vdpa_feature_bits array
in ascending order based on its value to avoid future duplicates.
Signed-off-by: Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@gmail.com>
---
v2:
- resolve conflicts with the master branch
v1: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-06/msg01585.html
net/vhost-vdpa.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/vhost-vdpa.c b/net/vhost-vdpa.c
index 0479988a79..db7f1241af 100644
--- a/net/vhost-vdpa.c
+++ b/net/vhost-vdpa.c
@@ -50,15 +50,12 @@ typedef struct VhostVDPAState {
bool started;
} VhostVDPAState;
+/* The array is sorted in ascending order based on its value */
const int vdpa_feature_bits[] = {
- VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY,
- VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC,
- VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX,
- VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT,
- VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1,
VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM,
VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM,
VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS,
+ VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU,
VIRTIO_NET_F_GSO,
VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4,
VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6,
@@ -69,19 +66,24 @@ const int vdpa_feature_bits[] = {
VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_ECN,
VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_UFO,
VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF,
- VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU,
+ VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS,
+ VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ,
VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX,
- VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX_EXTRA,
VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VLAN,
- VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR,
+ VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX_EXTRA,
VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ,
- VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ,
+ VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR,
+ VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY,
+ VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT,
+ VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC,
+ VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX,
+ VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1,
VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM,
VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED,
VIRTIO_F_RING_RESET,
- VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS,
VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT,
- VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS,
+ VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS,
+ /* VHOST_INVALID_FEATURE_BIT should always be the last entry */
VHOST_INVALID_FEATURE_BIT
};
--
2.25.1
On 30/6/23 10:54, Hawkins Jiawei wrote:
> This patch reorganizes the vdpa_feature_bits array
> in ascending order based on its value to avoid future duplicates.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - resolve conflicts with the master branch
>
> v1: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-06/msg01585.html
>
> net/vhost-vdpa.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/vhost-vdpa.c b/net/vhost-vdpa.c
> index 0479988a79..db7f1241af 100644
> --- a/net/vhost-vdpa.c
> +++ b/net/vhost-vdpa.c
> @@ -50,15 +50,12 @@ typedef struct VhostVDPAState {
> bool started;
> } VhostVDPAState;
>
> +/* The array is sorted in ascending order based on its value */
Alphabetically would have been simpler IMO, anyhow:
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
On 2023/6/30 18:20, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 30/6/23 10:54, Hawkins Jiawei wrote:
>> This patch reorganizes the vdpa_feature_bits array
>> in ascending order based on its value to avoid future duplicates.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - resolve conflicts with the master branch
>>
>> v1:
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-06/msg01585.html
>>
>> net/vhost-vdpa.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/vhost-vdpa.c b/net/vhost-vdpa.c
>> index 0479988a79..db7f1241af 100644
>> --- a/net/vhost-vdpa.c
>> +++ b/net/vhost-vdpa.c
>> @@ -50,15 +50,12 @@ typedef struct VhostVDPAState {
>> bool started;
>> } VhostVDPAState;
>> +/* The array is sorted in ascending order based on its value */
>
> Alphabetically would have been simpler IMO, anyhow:
Yes, it seems that rearranging the array in alphabetical order could
improve the maintainability of the code.
I will sort the features alphabetically, excluding
VHOST_INVALID_FEATURE_BIT, according to your suggestion.
Thanks!
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.