[PATCH 1/2] tcg/loongarch64: Implement INDEX_op_neg_i{32,64}

Qi Hu posted 2 patches 3 years, 4 months ago
Maintainers: WANG Xuerui <git@xen0n.name>, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
[PATCH 1/2] tcg/loongarch64: Implement INDEX_op_neg_i{32,64}
Posted by Qi Hu 3 years, 4 months ago
Signed-off-by: Qi Hu <huqi@loongson.cn>
---
 tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc | 9 +++++++++
 tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.h     | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc b/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc
index a3debf6da7..f5a214a17f 100644
--- a/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc
+++ b/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc
@@ -1125,6 +1125,13 @@ static void tcg_out_op(TCGContext *s, TCGOpcode opc,
         tcg_out_opc_nor(s, a0, a1, TCG_REG_ZERO);
         break;
 
+    case INDEX_op_neg_i32:
+        tcg_out_opc_sub_w(s, a0, TCG_REG_ZERO, a1);
+        break;
+    case INDEX_op_neg_i64:
+        tcg_out_opc_sub_d(s, a0, TCG_REG_ZERO, a1);
+        break;
+
     case INDEX_op_nor_i32:
     case INDEX_op_nor_i64:
         if (c2) {
@@ -1503,6 +1510,8 @@ static TCGConstraintSetIndex tcg_target_op_def(TCGOpcode op)
     case INDEX_op_ext_i32_i64:
     case INDEX_op_not_i32:
     case INDEX_op_not_i64:
+    case INDEX_op_neg_i32:
+    case INDEX_op_neg_i64:
     case INDEX_op_extract_i32:
     case INDEX_op_extract_i64:
     case INDEX_op_bswap16_i32:
diff --git a/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.h b/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.h
index d58a6162f2..67380b2432 100644
--- a/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.h
+++ b/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.h
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ typedef enum {
 #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_bswap16_i32      1
 #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_bswap32_i32      1
 #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_not_i32          1
-#define TCG_TARGET_HAS_neg_i32          0
+#define TCG_TARGET_HAS_neg_i32          1
 #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_andc_i32         1
 #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_orc_i32          1
 #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_eqv_i32          0
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ typedef enum {
 #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_bswap32_i64      1
 #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_bswap64_i64      1
 #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_not_i64          1
-#define TCG_TARGET_HAS_neg_i64          0
+#define TCG_TARGET_HAS_neg_i64          1
 #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_andc_i64         1
 #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_orc_i64          1
 #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_eqv_i64          0
-- 
2.37.3
Re: [PATCH 1/2] tcg/loongarch64: Implement INDEX_op_neg_i{32,64}
Posted by WANG Xuerui 3 years, 4 months ago
Hi,

On 2022/10/12 17:13, Qi Hu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Qi Hu <huqi@loongson.cn>
> ---
>   tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc | 9 +++++++++
>   tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.h     | 4 ++--
>   2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc b/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc
> index a3debf6da7..f5a214a17f 100644
> --- a/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc
> +++ b/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc
> @@ -1125,6 +1125,13 @@ static void tcg_out_op(TCGContext *s, TCGOpcode opc,
>           tcg_out_opc_nor(s, a0, a1, TCG_REG_ZERO);
>           break;
>   
> +    case INDEX_op_neg_i32:
> +        tcg_out_opc_sub_w(s, a0, TCG_REG_ZERO, a1);
> +        break;
> +    case INDEX_op_neg_i64:
> +        tcg_out_opc_sub_d(s, a0, TCG_REG_ZERO, a1);
> +        break;
> +
>       case INDEX_op_nor_i32:
>       case INDEX_op_nor_i64:
>           if (c2) {
> @@ -1503,6 +1510,8 @@ static TCGConstraintSetIndex tcg_target_op_def(TCGOpcode op)
>       case INDEX_op_ext_i32_i64:
>       case INDEX_op_not_i32:
>       case INDEX_op_not_i64:
> +    case INDEX_op_neg_i32:
> +    case INDEX_op_neg_i64:
>       case INDEX_op_extract_i32:
>       case INDEX_op_extract_i64:
>       case INDEX_op_bswap16_i32:
> diff --git a/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.h b/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.h
> index d58a6162f2..67380b2432 100644
> --- a/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.h
> +++ b/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.h
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ typedef enum {
>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_bswap16_i32      1
>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_bswap32_i32      1
>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_not_i32          1
> -#define TCG_TARGET_HAS_neg_i32          0
> +#define TCG_TARGET_HAS_neg_i32          1
>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_andc_i32         1
>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_orc_i32          1
>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_eqv_i32          0
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ typedef enum {
>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_bswap32_i64      1
>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_bswap64_i64      1
>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_not_i64          1
> -#define TCG_TARGET_HAS_neg_i64          0
> +#define TCG_TARGET_HAS_neg_i64          1
>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_andc_i64         1
>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_orc_i64          1
>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_eqv_i64          0
The whole change is not necessary, if target doesn't have neg then the 
target-independent logic already makes sure a sub with the same 
semantics is emitted. This is explained in the commit message of that 
commit introducing add/sub support.
Re: [PATCH 1/2] tcg/loongarch64: Implement INDEX_op_neg_i{32,64}
Posted by Qi Hu 3 years, 3 months ago
On 2022/10/12 17:41, WANG Xuerui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022/10/12 17:13, Qi Hu wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Qi Hu <huqi@loongson.cn>
>> ---
>>   tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc | 9 +++++++++
>>   tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.h     | 4 ++--
>>   2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc 
>> b/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc
>> index a3debf6da7..f5a214a17f 100644
>> --- a/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc
>> +++ b/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.c.inc
>> @@ -1125,6 +1125,13 @@ static void tcg_out_op(TCGContext *s, 
>> TCGOpcode opc,
>>           tcg_out_opc_nor(s, a0, a1, TCG_REG_ZERO);
>>           break;
>>   +    case INDEX_op_neg_i32:
>> +        tcg_out_opc_sub_w(s, a0, TCG_REG_ZERO, a1);
>> +        break;
>> +    case INDEX_op_neg_i64:
>> +        tcg_out_opc_sub_d(s, a0, TCG_REG_ZERO, a1);
>> +        break;
>> +
>>       case INDEX_op_nor_i32:
>>       case INDEX_op_nor_i64:
>>           if (c2) {
>> @@ -1503,6 +1510,8 @@ static TCGConstraintSetIndex 
>> tcg_target_op_def(TCGOpcode op)
>>       case INDEX_op_ext_i32_i64:
>>       case INDEX_op_not_i32:
>>       case INDEX_op_not_i64:
>> +    case INDEX_op_neg_i32:
>> +    case INDEX_op_neg_i64:
>>       case INDEX_op_extract_i32:
>>       case INDEX_op_extract_i64:
>>       case INDEX_op_bswap16_i32:
>> diff --git a/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.h b/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.h
>> index d58a6162f2..67380b2432 100644
>> --- a/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.h
>> +++ b/tcg/loongarch64/tcg-target.h
>> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ typedef enum {
>>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_bswap16_i32      1
>>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_bswap32_i32      1
>>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_not_i32          1
>> -#define TCG_TARGET_HAS_neg_i32          0
>> +#define TCG_TARGET_HAS_neg_i32          1
>>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_andc_i32         1
>>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_orc_i32          1
>>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_eqv_i32          0
>> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ typedef enum {
>>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_bswap32_i64      1
>>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_bswap64_i64      1
>>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_not_i64          1
>> -#define TCG_TARGET_HAS_neg_i64          0
>> +#define TCG_TARGET_HAS_neg_i64          1
>>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_andc_i64         1
>>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_orc_i64          1
>>   #define TCG_TARGET_HAS_eqv_i64          0
> The whole change is not necessary, if target doesn't have neg then the 
> target-independent logic already makes sure a sub with the same 
> semantics is emitted. This is explained in the commit message of that 
> commit introducing add/sub support.

That a good news. I think this patch can be absolutely ignored.

Thanks.

Qi