When parsing cpus= attribute of -numa object couple of checks
is performed, such as correct initiator setting (see the if()
statement at the end of for() loop in
machine_set_cpu_numa_node()).
However, with the current code cpus= attribute is parsed before
initiator= attribute and thus the check may fail even though it
is not obvious why. But since parsing the initiator= attribute
does not depend on the cpus= attribute we can swap the order of
the two.
It's fairly easy to reproduce with the following command line
(snippet of an actual cmd line):
-smp 4,sockets=4,cores=1,threads=1 \
-object '{"qom-type":"memory-backend-ram","id":"ram-node0","size":2147483648}' \
-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1,initiator=0,memdev=ram-node0 \
-object '{"qom-type":"memory-backend-ram","id":"ram-node1","size":2147483648}' \
-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=2-3,initiator=1,memdev=ram-node1 \
-numa hmat-lb,initiator=0,target=0,hierarchy=memory,data-type=access-latency,latency=5 \
-numa hmat-lb,initiator=0,target=0,hierarchy=first-level,data-type=access-latency,latency=10 \
-numa hmat-lb,initiator=1,target=1,hierarchy=memory,data-type=access-latency,latency=5 \
-numa hmat-lb,initiator=1,target=1,hierarchy=first-level,data-type=access-latency,latency=10 \
-numa hmat-lb,initiator=0,target=0,hierarchy=memory,data-type=access-bandwidth,bandwidth=204800K \
-numa hmat-lb,initiator=0,target=0,hierarchy=first-level,data-type=access-bandwidth,bandwidth=208896K \
-numa hmat-lb,initiator=1,target=1,hierarchy=memory,data-type=access-bandwidth,bandwidth=204800K \
-numa hmat-lb,initiator=1,target=1,hierarchy=first-level,data-type=access-bandwidth,bandwidth=208896K \
-numa hmat-cache,node-id=0,size=10K,level=1,associativity=direct,policy=write-back,line=8 \
-numa hmat-cache,node-id=1,size=10K,level=1,associativity=direct,policy=write-back,line=8 \
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
---
hw/core/numa.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/core/numa.c b/hw/core/numa.c
index 1058d3697b..510d096a88 100644
--- a/hw/core/numa.c
+++ b/hw/core/numa.c
@@ -88,6 +88,29 @@ static void parse_numa_node(MachineState *ms, NumaNodeOptions *node,
return;
}
+ /*
+ * If not set the initiator, set it to MAX_NODES. And if
+ * HMAT is enabled and this node has no cpus, QEMU will raise error.
+ */
+ numa_info[nodenr].initiator = MAX_NODES;
+ if (node->has_initiator) {
+ if (!ms->numa_state->hmat_enabled) {
+ error_setg(errp, "ACPI Heterogeneous Memory Attribute Table "
+ "(HMAT) is disabled, enable it with -machine hmat=on "
+ "before using any of hmat specific options");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (node->initiator >= MAX_NODES) {
+ error_report("The initiator id %" PRIu16 " expects an integer "
+ "between 0 and %d", node->initiator,
+ MAX_NODES - 1);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ numa_info[nodenr].initiator = node->initiator;
+ }
+
for (cpus = node->cpus; cpus; cpus = cpus->next) {
CpuInstanceProperties props;
if (cpus->value >= max_cpus) {
@@ -142,28 +165,6 @@ static void parse_numa_node(MachineState *ms, NumaNodeOptions *node,
numa_info[nodenr].node_memdev = MEMORY_BACKEND(o);
}
- /*
- * If not set the initiator, set it to MAX_NODES. And if
- * HMAT is enabled and this node has no cpus, QEMU will raise error.
- */
- numa_info[nodenr].initiator = MAX_NODES;
- if (node->has_initiator) {
- if (!ms->numa_state->hmat_enabled) {
- error_setg(errp, "ACPI Heterogeneous Memory Attribute Table "
- "(HMAT) is disabled, enable it with -machine hmat=on "
- "before using any of hmat specific options");
- return;
- }
-
- if (node->initiator >= MAX_NODES) {
- error_report("The initiator id %" PRIu16 " expects an integer "
- "between 0 and %d", node->initiator,
- MAX_NODES - 1);
- return;
- }
-
- numa_info[nodenr].initiator = node->initiator;
- }
numa_info[nodenr].present = true;
max_numa_nodeid = MAX(max_numa_nodeid, nodenr + 1);
ms->numa_state->num_nodes++;
--
2.31.1
On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 15:40:30 +0200
Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> wrote:
> When parsing cpus= attribute of -numa object couple of checks
> is performed, such as correct initiator setting (see the if()
> statement at the end of for() loop in
> machine_set_cpu_numa_node()).
>
> However, with the current code cpus= attribute is parsed before
> initiator= attribute and thus the check may fail even though it
> is not obvious why. But since parsing the initiator= attribute
> does not depend on the cpus= attribute we can swap the order of
> the two.
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
FYI:
I'm planning to deprecate '-numa node,cpus=' in favor of '-numa cpu'.
> It's fairly easy to reproduce with the following command line
> (snippet of an actual cmd line):
>
> -smp 4,sockets=4,cores=1,threads=1 \
> -object '{"qom-type":"memory-backend-ram","id":"ram-node0","size":2147483648}' \
> -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1,initiator=0,memdev=ram-node0 \
> -object '{"qom-type":"memory-backend-ram","id":"ram-node1","size":2147483648}' \
> -numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=2-3,initiator=1,memdev=ram-node1 \
> -numa hmat-lb,initiator=0,target=0,hierarchy=memory,data-type=access-latency,latency=5 \
> -numa hmat-lb,initiator=0,target=0,hierarchy=first-level,data-type=access-latency,latency=10 \
> -numa hmat-lb,initiator=1,target=1,hierarchy=memory,data-type=access-latency,latency=5 \
> -numa hmat-lb,initiator=1,target=1,hierarchy=first-level,data-type=access-latency,latency=10 \
> -numa hmat-lb,initiator=0,target=0,hierarchy=memory,data-type=access-bandwidth,bandwidth=204800K \
> -numa hmat-lb,initiator=0,target=0,hierarchy=first-level,data-type=access-bandwidth,bandwidth=208896K \
> -numa hmat-lb,initiator=1,target=1,hierarchy=memory,data-type=access-bandwidth,bandwidth=204800K \
> -numa hmat-lb,initiator=1,target=1,hierarchy=first-level,data-type=access-bandwidth,bandwidth=208896K \
> -numa hmat-cache,node-id=0,size=10K,level=1,associativity=direct,policy=write-back,line=8 \
> -numa hmat-cache,node-id=1,size=10K,level=1,associativity=direct,policy=write-back,line=8 \
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/core/numa.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/core/numa.c b/hw/core/numa.c
> index 1058d3697b..510d096a88 100644
> --- a/hw/core/numa.c
> +++ b/hw/core/numa.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,29 @@ static void parse_numa_node(MachineState *ms, NumaNodeOptions *node,
> return;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * If not set the initiator, set it to MAX_NODES. And if
> + * HMAT is enabled and this node has no cpus, QEMU will raise error.
> + */
> + numa_info[nodenr].initiator = MAX_NODES;
> + if (node->has_initiator) {
> + if (!ms->numa_state->hmat_enabled) {
> + error_setg(errp, "ACPI Heterogeneous Memory Attribute Table "
> + "(HMAT) is disabled, enable it with -machine hmat=on "
> + "before using any of hmat specific options");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (node->initiator >= MAX_NODES) {
> + error_report("The initiator id %" PRIu16 " expects an integer "
> + "between 0 and %d", node->initiator,
> + MAX_NODES - 1);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + numa_info[nodenr].initiator = node->initiator;
> + }
> +
> for (cpus = node->cpus; cpus; cpus = cpus->next) {
> CpuInstanceProperties props;
> if (cpus->value >= max_cpus) {
> @@ -142,28 +165,6 @@ static void parse_numa_node(MachineState *ms, NumaNodeOptions *node,
> numa_info[nodenr].node_memdev = MEMORY_BACKEND(o);
> }
>
> - /*
> - * If not set the initiator, set it to MAX_NODES. And if
> - * HMAT is enabled and this node has no cpus, QEMU will raise error.
> - */
> - numa_info[nodenr].initiator = MAX_NODES;
> - if (node->has_initiator) {
> - if (!ms->numa_state->hmat_enabled) {
> - error_setg(errp, "ACPI Heterogeneous Memory Attribute Table "
> - "(HMAT) is disabled, enable it with -machine hmat=on "
> - "before using any of hmat specific options");
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - if (node->initiator >= MAX_NODES) {
> - error_report("The initiator id %" PRIu16 " expects an integer "
> - "between 0 and %d", node->initiator,
> - MAX_NODES - 1);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - numa_info[nodenr].initiator = node->initiator;
> - }
> numa_info[nodenr].present = true;
> max_numa_nodeid = MAX(max_numa_nodeid, nodenr + 1);
> ms->numa_state->num_nodes++;
On 7/9/21 11:26 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 15:40:30 +0200 > Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> wrote: > >> When parsing cpus= attribute of -numa object couple of checks >> is performed, such as correct initiator setting (see the if() >> statement at the end of for() loop in >> machine_set_cpu_numa_node()). >> >> However, with the current code cpus= attribute is parsed before >> initiator= attribute and thus the check may fail even though it >> is not obvious why. But since parsing the initiator= attribute >> does not depend on the cpus= attribute we can swap the order of >> the two. > > Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> > > FYI: > I'm planning to deprecate '-numa node,cpus=' in favor of '-numa cpu'. Yes, I'm aware of that and I remember I posted some patches for libvirt that you reviewed. I need to return to them rather sooner than later. Meanwhile, this patch helps. Thanks, Michal
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.