[PATCH v7 1/4] block/replication.c: Ignore requests after failover

Lukas Straub posted 4 patches 6 years, 3 months ago
Maintainers: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, Hailiang Zhang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>, Wen Congyang <wencongyang2@huawei.com>, Xie Changlong <xiechanglong.d@gmail.com>
[PATCH v7 1/4] block/replication.c: Ignore requests after failover
Posted by Lukas Straub 6 years, 3 months ago
After failover the Secondary side of replication shouldn't change state, because
it now functions as our primary disk.

In replication_start, replication_do_checkpoint, replication_stop, ignore
the request if current state is BLOCK_REPLICATION_DONE (sucessful failover) or
BLOCK_REPLICATION_FAILOVER (failover in progres i.e. currently merging active
and hidden images into the base image).

Signed-off-by: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
---
 block/replication.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/replication.c b/block/replication.c
index 3d4dedddfc..78234d1a04 100644
--- a/block/replication.c
+++ b/block/replication.c
@@ -454,6 +454,17 @@ static void replication_start(ReplicationState *rs, ReplicationMode mode,
     aio_context_acquire(aio_context);
     s = bs->opaque;

+    if (s->stage == BLOCK_REPLICATION_DONE ||
+        s->stage == BLOCK_REPLICATION_FAILOVER) {
+        /*
+         * This case happens when a secondary is promoted to primary.
+         * Ignore the request because the secondary side of replication
+         * doesn't have to do anything anymore.
+         */
+        aio_context_release(aio_context);
+        return;
+    }
+
     if (s->stage != BLOCK_REPLICATION_NONE) {
         error_setg(errp, "Block replication is running or done");
         aio_context_release(aio_context);
@@ -577,6 +588,17 @@ static void replication_do_checkpoint(ReplicationState *rs, Error **errp)
     aio_context_acquire(aio_context);
     s = bs->opaque;

+    if (s->stage == BLOCK_REPLICATION_DONE ||
+        s->stage == BLOCK_REPLICATION_FAILOVER) {
+        /*
+         * This case happens when a secondary was promoted to primary.
+         * Ignore the request because the secondary side of replication
+         * doesn't have to do anything anymore.
+         */
+        aio_context_release(aio_context);
+        return;
+    }
+
     if (s->mode == REPLICATION_MODE_SECONDARY) {
         secondary_do_checkpoint(s, errp);
     }
@@ -593,7 +615,7 @@ static void replication_get_error(ReplicationState *rs, Error **errp)
     aio_context_acquire(aio_context);
     s = bs->opaque;

-    if (s->stage != BLOCK_REPLICATION_RUNNING) {
+    if (s->stage == BLOCK_REPLICATION_NONE) {
         error_setg(errp, "Block replication is not running");
         aio_context_release(aio_context);
         return;
@@ -635,6 +657,17 @@ static void replication_stop(ReplicationState *rs, bool failover, Error **errp)
     aio_context_acquire(aio_context);
     s = bs->opaque;

+    if (s->stage == BLOCK_REPLICATION_DONE ||
+        s->stage == BLOCK_REPLICATION_FAILOVER) {
+        /*
+         * This case happens when a secondary was promoted to primary.
+         * Ignore the request because the secondary side of replication
+         * doesn't have to do anything anymore.
+         */
+        aio_context_release(aio_context);
+        return;
+    }
+
     if (s->stage != BLOCK_REPLICATION_RUNNING) {
         error_setg(errp, "Block replication is not running");
         aio_context_release(aio_context);
--
2.20.1


Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] block/replication.c: Ignore requests after failover
Posted by Max Reitz 6 years, 3 months ago
On 24.10.19 16:25, Lukas Straub wrote:
> After failover the Secondary side of replication shouldn't change state, because
> it now functions as our primary disk.
> 
> In replication_start, replication_do_checkpoint, replication_stop, ignore
> the request if current state is BLOCK_REPLICATION_DONE (sucessful failover) or
> BLOCK_REPLICATION_FAILOVER (failover in progres i.e. currently merging active
> and hidden images into the base image).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>
> Reviewed-by: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>  block/replication.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Acked-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>