Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
---
tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py | 4 ++++
tests/test-qmp-cmds.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json b/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json
index 75c42eb0e3..220859d4c9 100644
--- a/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json
+++ b/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json
@@ -290,3 +290,29 @@
'cfs1': 'CondFeatureStruct1',
'cfs2': 'CondFeatureStruct2',
'cfs3': 'CondFeatureStruct3' } }
+
+# test 'features' for command
+
+{ 'command': 'test-command-features1',
+ 'features': [] }
+
+{ 'command': 'test-command-features2',
+ 'features': [ 'feature1' ] }
+
+{ 'command': 'test-command-features3',
+ 'features': [ 'feature1', 'feature2' ] }
+
+{ 'command': 'test-command-features4',
+ 'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)'} ] }
+
+{ 'command': 'test-command-features5',
+ 'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)'},
+ { 'name': 'feature2', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_2)'} ] }
+
+{ 'command': 'test-command-features6',
+ 'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)'},
+ { 'name': 'feature2', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_2)'} ] }
+
+{ 'command': 'test-command-features7',
+ 'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1', 'if': [ 'defined(TEST_IF_COND_1)',
+ 'defined(TEST_IF_COND_2)'] } ] }
diff --git a/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out b/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out
index 98031da96f..a38e348d54 100644
--- a/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out
+++ b/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out
@@ -412,3 +412,32 @@ object q_obj_test-features-arg
member cfs3: CondFeatureStruct3 optional=False
command test-features q_obj_test-features-arg -> None
gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
+command test-command-features1 None -> None
+ gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
+command test-command-features2 None -> None
+ gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
+ feature feature1
+command test-command-features3 None -> None
+ gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
+ feature feature1
+ feature feature2
+command test-command-features4 None -> None
+ gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
+ feature feature1
+ if ['defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)']
+command test-command-features5 None -> None
+ gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
+ feature feature1
+ if ['defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)']
+ feature feature2
+ if ['defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_2)']
+command test-command-features6 None -> None
+ gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
+ feature feature1
+ if ['defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)']
+ feature feature2
+ if ['defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_2)']
+command test-command-features7 None -> None
+ gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
+ feature feature1
+ if ['defined(TEST_IF_COND_1)', 'defined(TEST_IF_COND_2)']
diff --git a/tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py b/tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py
index e13c2e8671..62e65b6a7d 100755
--- a/tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py
+++ b/tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py
@@ -80,6 +80,10 @@ class QAPISchemaTestVisitor(QAPISchemaVisitor):
print(' gen=%s success_response=%s boxed=%s oob=%s preconfig=%s'
% (gen, success_response, boxed, allow_oob, allow_preconfig))
self._print_if(ifcond)
+ if features:
+ for f in features:
+ print(' feature %s' % f.name)
+ self._print_if(f.ifcond, 8)
def visit_event(self, name, info, ifcond, arg_type, boxed):
print('event %s %s' % (name, arg_type and arg_type.name))
diff --git a/tests/test-qmp-cmds.c b/tests/test-qmp-cmds.c
index 36fdf5b115..19f6e06ba7 100644
--- a/tests/test-qmp-cmds.c
+++ b/tests/test-qmp-cmds.c
@@ -51,6 +51,34 @@ void qmp_test_features(FeatureStruct0 *fs0, FeatureStruct1 *fs1,
{
}
+void qmp_test_command_features1(Error **errp)
+{
+}
+
+void qmp_test_command_features2(Error **errp)
+{
+}
+
+void qmp_test_command_features3(Error **errp)
+{
+}
+
+void qmp_test_command_features4(Error **errp)
+{
+}
+
+void qmp_test_command_features5(Error **errp)
+{
+}
+
+void qmp_test_command_features6(Error **errp)
+{
+}
+
+void qmp_test_command_features7(Error **errp)
+{
+}
+
UserDefTwo *qmp_user_def_cmd2(UserDefOne *ud1a,
bool has_udb1, UserDefOne *ud1b,
Error **errp)
--
2.21.0
Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com> writes:
> Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
> ---
> tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py | 4 ++++
> tests/test-qmp-cmds.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
More thorough than I asked for. I'm not complaining :)
>
> diff --git a/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json b/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json
> index 75c42eb0e3..220859d4c9 100644
> --- a/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json
> +++ b/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json
> @@ -290,3 +290,29 @@
> 'cfs1': 'CondFeatureStruct1',
> 'cfs2': 'CondFeatureStruct2',
> 'cfs3': 'CondFeatureStruct3' } }
> +
> +# test 'features' for command
> +
> +{ 'command': 'test-command-features1',
> + 'features': [] }
> +
> +{ 'command': 'test-command-features2',
> + 'features': [ 'feature1' ] }
> +
> +{ 'command': 'test-command-features3',
> + 'features': [ 'feature1', 'feature2' ] }
> +
> +{ 'command': 'test-command-features4',
> + 'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)'} ] }
> +
> +{ 'command': 'test-command-features5',
> + 'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)'},
> + { 'name': 'feature2', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_2)'} ] }
> +
> +{ 'command': 'test-command-features6',
> + 'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)'},
> + { 'name': 'feature2', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_2)'} ] }
Do you need both test-command-features5 and 6? They look the same to me...
> +
> +{ 'command': 'test-command-features7',
> + 'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1', 'if': [ 'defined(TEST_IF_COND_1)',
> + 'defined(TEST_IF_COND_2)'] } ] }
> diff --git a/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out b/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out
> index 98031da96f..a38e348d54 100644
> --- a/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out
> +++ b/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out
> @@ -412,3 +412,32 @@ object q_obj_test-features-arg
> member cfs3: CondFeatureStruct3 optional=False
> command test-features q_obj_test-features-arg -> None
> gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
> +command test-command-features1 None -> None
> + gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
> +command test-command-features2 None -> None
> + gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
> + feature feature1
> +command test-command-features3 None -> None
> + gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
> + feature feature1
> + feature feature2
> +command test-command-features4 None -> None
> + gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
> + feature feature1
> + if ['defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)']
> +command test-command-features5 None -> None
> + gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
> + feature feature1
> + if ['defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)']
> + feature feature2
> + if ['defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_2)']
> +command test-command-features6 None -> None
> + gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
> + feature feature1
> + if ['defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)']
> + feature feature2
> + if ['defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_2)']
> +command test-command-features7 None -> None
> + gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
> + feature feature1
> + if ['defined(TEST_IF_COND_1)', 'defined(TEST_IF_COND_2)']
> diff --git a/tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py b/tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py
> index e13c2e8671..62e65b6a7d 100755
> --- a/tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py
> +++ b/tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py
> @@ -80,6 +80,10 @@ class QAPISchemaTestVisitor(QAPISchemaVisitor):
> print(' gen=%s success_response=%s boxed=%s oob=%s preconfig=%s'
> % (gen, success_response, boxed, allow_oob, allow_preconfig))
> self._print_if(ifcond)
> + if features:
> + for f in features:
> + print(' feature %s' % f.name)
> + self._print_if(f.ifcond, 8)
Copied from visit_object_type(). Let's factor it into a @staticmethod
_print_features().
>
> def visit_event(self, name, info, ifcond, arg_type, boxed):
> print('event %s %s' % (name, arg_type and arg_type.name))
> diff --git a/tests/test-qmp-cmds.c b/tests/test-qmp-cmds.c
> index 36fdf5b115..19f6e06ba7 100644
> --- a/tests/test-qmp-cmds.c
> +++ b/tests/test-qmp-cmds.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,34 @@ void qmp_test_features(FeatureStruct0 *fs0, FeatureStruct1 *fs1,
> {
> }
>
> +void qmp_test_command_features1(Error **errp)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +void qmp_test_command_features2(Error **errp)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +void qmp_test_command_features3(Error **errp)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +void qmp_test_command_features4(Error **errp)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +void qmp_test_command_features5(Error **errp)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +void qmp_test_command_features6(Error **errp)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +void qmp_test_command_features7(Error **errp)
> +{
> +}
> +
> UserDefTwo *qmp_user_def_cmd2(UserDefOne *ud1a,
> bool has_udb1, UserDefOne *ud1b,
> Error **errp)
Any particular reason why we shouldn't squash this into PATCH 1?
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 15:53:30 +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py | 4 ++++
> > tests/test-qmp-cmds.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
>
> More thorough than I asked for. I'm not complaining :)
>
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json b/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json
> > index 75c42eb0e3..220859d4c9 100644
> > --- a/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json
> > +++ b/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json
> > @@ -290,3 +290,29 @@
> > 'cfs1': 'CondFeatureStruct1',
> > 'cfs2': 'CondFeatureStruct2',
> > 'cfs3': 'CondFeatureStruct3' } }
> > +
> > +# test 'features' for command
> > +
> > +{ 'command': 'test-command-features1',
> > + 'features': [] }
> > +
> > +{ 'command': 'test-command-features2',
> > + 'features': [ 'feature1' ] }
> > +
> > +{ 'command': 'test-command-features3',
> > + 'features': [ 'feature1', 'feature2' ] }
> > +
> > +{ 'command': 'test-command-features4',
> > + 'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)'} ] }
> > +
> > +{ 'command': 'test-command-features5',
> > + 'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)'},
> > + { 'name': 'feature2', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_2)'} ] }
> > +
> > +{ 'command': 'test-command-features6',
> > + 'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)'},
> > + { 'name': 'feature2', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_2)'} ] }
>
> Do you need both test-command-features5 and 6? They look the same to me...
No. It can be dropped. Looks like I mistakenly appropriated
'CondFeatureStruct2' test twice :/
> > +{ 'command': 'test-command-features7',
> > + 'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1', 'if': [ 'defined(TEST_IF_COND_1)',
> > + 'defined(TEST_IF_COND_2)'] } ] }
> > diff --git a/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out b/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out
> > index 98031da96f..a38e348d54 100644
> > --- a/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out
> > +++ b/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out
> > @@ -412,3 +412,32 @@ object q_obj_test-features-arg
> > member cfs3: CondFeatureStruct3 optional=False
> > command test-features q_obj_test-features-arg -> None
> > gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
> > +command test-command-features1 None -> None
> > + gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
> > +command test-command-features2 None -> None
> > + gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
> > + feature feature1
> > +command test-command-features3 None -> None
> > + gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
> > + feature feature1
> > + feature feature2
> > +command test-command-features4 None -> None
> > + gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
> > + feature feature1
> > + if ['defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)']
> > +command test-command-features5 None -> None
> > + gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
> > + feature feature1
> > + if ['defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)']
> > + feature feature2
> > + if ['defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_2)']
> > +command test-command-features6 None -> None
> > + gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
> > + feature feature1
> > + if ['defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)']
> > + feature feature2
> > + if ['defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_2)']
> > +command test-command-features7 None -> None
> > + gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
> > + feature feature1
> > + if ['defined(TEST_IF_COND_1)', 'defined(TEST_IF_COND_2)']
> > diff --git a/tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py b/tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py
> > index e13c2e8671..62e65b6a7d 100755
> > --- a/tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py
> > +++ b/tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py
> > @@ -80,6 +80,10 @@ class QAPISchemaTestVisitor(QAPISchemaVisitor):
> > print(' gen=%s success_response=%s boxed=%s oob=%s preconfig=%s'
> > % (gen, success_response, boxed, allow_oob, allow_preconfig))
> > self._print_if(ifcond)
> > + if features:
> > + for f in features:
> > + print(' feature %s' % f.name)
> > + self._print_if(f.ifcond, 8)
>
> Copied from visit_object_type(). Let's factor it into a @staticmethod
> _print_features().
I'm not sure if that's intentional but the 'struct' and 'command'
feature printers differ in indentation level by one space. I went for
aligning it with the 'gen' line above. I thought it's for visual
separation with other possible lines.
> > def visit_event(self, name, info, ifcond, arg_type, boxed):
> > print('event %s %s' % (name, arg_type and arg_type.name))
> > diff --git a/tests/test-qmp-cmds.c b/tests/test-qmp-cmds.c
> > index 36fdf5b115..19f6e06ba7 100644
> > --- a/tests/test-qmp-cmds.c
> > +++ b/tests/test-qmp-cmds.c
> > @@ -51,6 +51,34 @@ void qmp_test_features(FeatureStruct0 *fs0, FeatureStruct1 *fs1,
> > {
> > }
> >
> > +void qmp_test_command_features1(Error **errp)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +void qmp_test_command_features2(Error **errp)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +void qmp_test_command_features3(Error **errp)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +void qmp_test_command_features4(Error **errp)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +void qmp_test_command_features5(Error **errp)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +void qmp_test_command_features6(Error **errp)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +void qmp_test_command_features7(Error **errp)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > UserDefTwo *qmp_user_def_cmd2(UserDefOne *ud1a,
> > bool has_udb1, UserDefOne *ud1b,
> > Error **errp)
>
> Any particular reason why we shouldn't squash this into PATCH 1?
Not really. I tend to prefer tests added separately and it was also done
so in case of features for 'structs' so I went with that approach. Said
that I'm perfectly fine with squashing them.
Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 15:53:30 +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> > Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
>> > ---
>> > tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py | 4 ++++
>> > tests/test-qmp-cmds.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > 4 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
>>
>> More thorough than I asked for. I'm not complaining :)
>>
>> >
>> > diff --git a/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json b/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json
>> > index 75c42eb0e3..220859d4c9 100644
>> > --- a/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json
>> > +++ b/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json
>> > @@ -290,3 +290,29 @@
>> > 'cfs1': 'CondFeatureStruct1',
>> > 'cfs2': 'CondFeatureStruct2',
>> > 'cfs3': 'CondFeatureStruct3' } }
>> > +
>> > +# test 'features' for command
>> > +
>> > +{ 'command': 'test-command-features1',
>> > + 'features': [] }
>> > +
>> > +{ 'command': 'test-command-features2',
>> > + 'features': [ 'feature1' ] }
>> > +
>> > +{ 'command': 'test-command-features3',
>> > + 'features': [ 'feature1', 'feature2' ] }
>> > +
>> > +{ 'command': 'test-command-features4',
>> > + 'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)'} ] }
>> > +
>> > +{ 'command': 'test-command-features5',
>> > + 'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)'},
>> > + { 'name': 'feature2', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_2)'} ] }
>> > +
>> > +{ 'command': 'test-command-features6',
>> > + 'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)'},
>> > + { 'name': 'feature2', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_2)'} ] }
>>
>> Do you need both test-command-features5 and 6? They look the same to me...
>
> No. It can be dropped. Looks like I mistakenly appropriated
> 'CondFeatureStruct2' test twice :/
Easy enough to fix :)
>> > +{ 'command': 'test-command-features7',
>> > + 'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1', 'if': [ 'defined(TEST_IF_COND_1)',
>> > + 'defined(TEST_IF_COND_2)'] } ] }
>> > diff --git a/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out b/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out
>> > index 98031da96f..a38e348d54 100644
>> > --- a/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out
>> > +++ b/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out
>> > @@ -412,3 +412,32 @@ object q_obj_test-features-arg
>> > member cfs3: CondFeatureStruct3 optional=False
>> > command test-features q_obj_test-features-arg -> None
>> > gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
>> > +command test-command-features1 None -> None
>> > + gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
>> > +command test-command-features2 None -> None
>> > + gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
>> > + feature feature1
>> > +command test-command-features3 None -> None
>> > + gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
>> > + feature feature1
>> > + feature feature2
>> > +command test-command-features4 None -> None
>> > + gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
>> > + feature feature1
>> > + if ['defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)']
>> > +command test-command-features5 None -> None
>> > + gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
>> > + feature feature1
>> > + if ['defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)']
>> > + feature feature2
>> > + if ['defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_2)']
>> > +command test-command-features6 None -> None
>> > + gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
>> > + feature feature1
>> > + if ['defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_1)']
>> > + feature feature2
>> > + if ['defined(TEST_IF_FEATURE_2)']
>> > +command test-command-features7 None -> None
>> > + gen=True success_response=True boxed=False oob=False preconfig=False
>> > + feature feature1
>> > + if ['defined(TEST_IF_COND_1)', 'defined(TEST_IF_COND_2)']
>> > diff --git a/tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py b/tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py
>> > index e13c2e8671..62e65b6a7d 100755
>> > --- a/tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py
>> > +++ b/tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py
>> > @@ -80,6 +80,10 @@ class QAPISchemaTestVisitor(QAPISchemaVisitor):
>> > print(' gen=%s success_response=%s boxed=%s oob=%s preconfig=%s'
>> > % (gen, success_response, boxed, allow_oob, allow_preconfig))
>> > self._print_if(ifcond)
>> > + if features:
>> > + for f in features:
>> > + print(' feature %s' % f.name)
>> > + self._print_if(f.ifcond, 8)
>>
>> Copied from visit_object_type(). Let's factor it into a @staticmethod
>> _print_features().
>
> I'm not sure if that's intentional but the 'struct' and 'command'
> feature printers differ in indentation level by one space. I went for
> aligning it with the 'gen' line above. I thought it's for visual
> separation with other possible lines.
You're right. I think I simply messed up the spacing in commit
156402e5042. I'd like to clean it up.
I think it's easiest if I do the touch-ups here and in PATCH 1 (they're
all straightforward). I'll post them as v4 so you can give them a quick
eye-over.
>> > def visit_event(self, name, info, ifcond, arg_type, boxed):
>> > print('event %s %s' % (name, arg_type and arg_type.name))
>> > diff --git a/tests/test-qmp-cmds.c b/tests/test-qmp-cmds.c
>> > index 36fdf5b115..19f6e06ba7 100644
>> > --- a/tests/test-qmp-cmds.c
>> > +++ b/tests/test-qmp-cmds.c
>> > @@ -51,6 +51,34 @@ void qmp_test_features(FeatureStruct0 *fs0, FeatureStruct1 *fs1,
>> > {
>> > }
>> >
>> > +void qmp_test_command_features1(Error **errp)
>> > +{
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +void qmp_test_command_features2(Error **errp)
>> > +{
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +void qmp_test_command_features3(Error **errp)
>> > +{
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +void qmp_test_command_features4(Error **errp)
>> > +{
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +void qmp_test_command_features5(Error **errp)
>> > +{
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +void qmp_test_command_features6(Error **errp)
>> > +{
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +void qmp_test_command_features7(Error **errp)
>> > +{
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > UserDefTwo *qmp_user_def_cmd2(UserDefOne *ud1a,
>> > bool has_udb1, UserDefOne *ud1b,
>> > Error **errp)
>>
>> Any particular reason why we shouldn't squash this into PATCH 1?
>
> Not really. I tend to prefer tests added separately and it was also done
> so in case of features for 'structs' so I went with that approach. Said
> that I'm perfectly fine with squashing them.
Okay.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.