This simulates the case that happens when we resume COLO after failover.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>
---
tests/test-replication.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/test-replication.c b/tests/test-replication.c
index f085d1993a..5addfc2227 100644
--- a/tests/test-replication.c
+++ b/tests/test-replication.c
@@ -489,6 +489,56 @@ static void test_secondary_stop(void)
teardown_secondary();
}
+static void test_secondary_failover_then_ignore_requests(void)
+{
+ BlockBackend *top_blk, *local_blk;
+ Error *local_err = NULL;
+
+ top_blk = start_secondary();
+ replication_start_all(REPLICATION_MODE_SECONDARY, &local_err);
+ g_assert(!local_err);
+
+ /* write 0x22 to s_local_disk (IMG_SIZE / 2, IMG_SIZE) */
+ local_blk = blk_by_name(S_LOCAL_DISK_ID);
+ test_blk_write(local_blk, 0x22, IMG_SIZE / 2, IMG_SIZE / 2, false);
+
+ /* replication will backup s_local_disk to s_hidden_disk */
+ test_blk_read(top_blk, 0x11, IMG_SIZE / 2,
+ IMG_SIZE / 2, 0, IMG_SIZE, false);
+
+ /* write 0x33 to s_active_disk (0, IMG_SIZE / 2) */
+ test_blk_write(top_blk, 0x33, 0, IMG_SIZE / 2, false);
+
+ /* do failover (active commit) */
+ replication_stop_all(true, &local_err);
+ g_assert(!local_err);
+
+ /* it should ignore all requests from now on */
+
+ /* start after failover */
+ replication_start_all(REPLICATION_MODE_PRIMARY, &local_err);
+ g_assert(!local_err);
+
+ /* checkpoint */
+ replication_do_checkpoint_all(&local_err);
+ g_assert(!local_err);
+
+ /* stop */
+ replication_stop_all(true, &local_err);
+ g_assert(!local_err);
+
+ /* read from s_local_disk (0, IMG_SIZE / 2) */
+ test_blk_read(top_blk, 0x33, 0, IMG_SIZE / 2,
+ 0, IMG_SIZE / 2, false);
+
+
+ /* read from s_local_disk (IMG_SIZE / 2, IMG_SIZE) */
+ test_blk_read(top_blk, 0x22, IMG_SIZE / 2,
+ IMG_SIZE / 2, 0, IMG_SIZE, false);
+
+ teardown_secondary();
+}
+
static void test_secondary_do_checkpoint(void)
{
BlockBackend *top_blk, *local_blk;
@@ -584,6 +634,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/write", test_secondary_write);
g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/start", test_secondary_start);
g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/stop", test_secondary_stop);
+ g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/failover_then_ignore_requests",
+ test_secondary_failover_then_ignore_requests);
g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/do_checkpoint",
test_secondary_do_checkpoint);
g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/get_error_all",
--
2.20.1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>
> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 3:20 AM
> To: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
> Cc: Zhang, Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>; Jason Wang
> <jasowang@redhat.com>; Wen Congyang <wencongyang2@huawei.com>;
> Xie Changlong <xiechanglong.d@gmail.com>; kwolf@redhat.com;
> mreitz@redhat.com
> Subject: [PATCH v5 2/4] tests/test-replication.c: Add test for ignoring
> requests after failover
>
> This simulates the case that happens when we resume COLO after failover.
>
It looks change the title to "Add test for secondary node continuous backup" is better.
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>
> ---
> tests/test-replication.c | 52
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/test-replication.c b/tests/test-replication.c index
> f085d1993a..5addfc2227 100644
> --- a/tests/test-replication.c
> +++ b/tests/test-replication.c
> @@ -489,6 +489,56 @@ static void test_secondary_stop(void)
> teardown_secondary();
> }
>
> +static void test_secondary_failover_then_ignore_requests(void)
Same as title, I think change to "test_secondary_continuous_backup" is more clear.
Thanks
Zhang Chen
> +{
> + BlockBackend *top_blk, *local_blk;
> + Error *local_err = NULL;
> +
> + top_blk = start_secondary();
> + replication_start_all(REPLICATION_MODE_SECONDARY, &local_err);
> + g_assert(!local_err);
> +
> + /* write 0x22 to s_local_disk (IMG_SIZE / 2, IMG_SIZE) */
> + local_blk = blk_by_name(S_LOCAL_DISK_ID);
> + test_blk_write(local_blk, 0x22, IMG_SIZE / 2, IMG_SIZE / 2, false);
> +
> + /* replication will backup s_local_disk to s_hidden_disk */
> + test_blk_read(top_blk, 0x11, IMG_SIZE / 2,
> + IMG_SIZE / 2, 0, IMG_SIZE, false);
> +
> + /* write 0x33 to s_active_disk (0, IMG_SIZE / 2) */
> + test_blk_write(top_blk, 0x33, 0, IMG_SIZE / 2, false);
> +
> + /* do failover (active commit) */
> + replication_stop_all(true, &local_err);
> + g_assert(!local_err);
> +
> + /* it should ignore all requests from now on */
> +
> + /* start after failover */
> + replication_start_all(REPLICATION_MODE_PRIMARY, &local_err);
> + g_assert(!local_err);
> +
> + /* checkpoint */
> + replication_do_checkpoint_all(&local_err);
> + g_assert(!local_err);
> +
> + /* stop */
> + replication_stop_all(true, &local_err);
> + g_assert(!local_err);
> +
> + /* read from s_local_disk (0, IMG_SIZE / 2) */
> + test_blk_read(top_blk, 0x33, 0, IMG_SIZE / 2,
> + 0, IMG_SIZE / 2, false);
> +
> +
> + /* read from s_local_disk (IMG_SIZE / 2, IMG_SIZE) */
> + test_blk_read(top_blk, 0x22, IMG_SIZE / 2,
> + IMG_SIZE / 2, 0, IMG_SIZE, false);
> +
> + teardown_secondary();
> +}
> +
> static void test_secondary_do_checkpoint(void)
> {
> BlockBackend *top_blk, *local_blk;
> @@ -584,6 +634,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/write", test_secondary_write);
> g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/start", test_secondary_start);
> g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/stop", test_secondary_stop);
> +
> g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/failover_then_ignore_requests",
> + test_secondary_failover_then_ignore_requests);
> g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/do_checkpoint",
> test_secondary_do_checkpoint);
> g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/get_error_all",
> --
> 2.20.1
On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:40:03 +0000
"Zhang, Chen" <chen.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>
> > Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 3:20 AM
> > To: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
> > Cc: Zhang, Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>; Jason Wang
> > <jasowang@redhat.com>; Wen Congyang <wencongyang2@huawei.com>;
> > Xie Changlong <xiechanglong.d@gmail.com>; kwolf@redhat.com;
> > mreitz@redhat.com
> > Subject: [PATCH v5 2/4] tests/test-replication.c: Add test for ignoring
> > requests after failover
> >
> > This simulates the case that happens when we resume COLO after failover.
> >
>
> It looks change the title to "Add test for secondary node continuous backup" is better.
Did you mean "continuous replication"? Would "Add test for secondary node continuing replication" be Ok?
> > Signed-off-by: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>
> > ---
> > tests/test-replication.c | 52
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/test-replication.c b/tests/test-replication.c index
> > f085d1993a..5addfc2227 100644
> > --- a/tests/test-replication.c
> > +++ b/tests/test-replication.c
> > @@ -489,6 +489,56 @@ static void test_secondary_stop(void)
> > teardown_secondary();
> > }
> >
> > +static void test_secondary_failover_then_ignore_requests(void)
>
> Same as title, I think change to "test_secondary_continuous_backup" is more clear.
>
> Thanks
> Zhang Chen
>
> > +{
> > + BlockBackend *top_blk, *local_blk;
> > + Error *local_err = NULL;
> > +
> > + top_blk = start_secondary();
> > + replication_start_all(REPLICATION_MODE_SECONDARY, &local_err);
> > + g_assert(!local_err);
> > +
> > + /* write 0x22 to s_local_disk (IMG_SIZE / 2, IMG_SIZE) */
> > + local_blk = blk_by_name(S_LOCAL_DISK_ID);
> > + test_blk_write(local_blk, 0x22, IMG_SIZE / 2, IMG_SIZE / 2, false);
> > +
> > + /* replication will backup s_local_disk to s_hidden_disk */
> > + test_blk_read(top_blk, 0x11, IMG_SIZE / 2,
> > + IMG_SIZE / 2, 0, IMG_SIZE, false);
> > +
> > + /* write 0x33 to s_active_disk (0, IMG_SIZE / 2) */
> > + test_blk_write(top_blk, 0x33, 0, IMG_SIZE / 2, false);
> > +
> > + /* do failover (active commit) */
> > + replication_stop_all(true, &local_err);
> > + g_assert(!local_err);
> > +
> > + /* it should ignore all requests from now on */
> > +
> > + /* start after failover */
> > + replication_start_all(REPLICATION_MODE_PRIMARY, &local_err);
> > + g_assert(!local_err);
> > +
> > + /* checkpoint */
> > + replication_do_checkpoint_all(&local_err);
> > + g_assert(!local_err);
> > +
> > + /* stop */
> > + replication_stop_all(true, &local_err);
> > + g_assert(!local_err);
> > +
> > + /* read from s_local_disk (0, IMG_SIZE / 2) */
> > + test_blk_read(top_blk, 0x33, 0, IMG_SIZE / 2,
> > + 0, IMG_SIZE / 2, false);
> > +
> > +
> > + /* read from s_local_disk (IMG_SIZE / 2, IMG_SIZE) */
> > + test_blk_read(top_blk, 0x22, IMG_SIZE / 2,
> > + IMG_SIZE / 2, 0, IMG_SIZE, false);
> > +
> > + teardown_secondary();
> > +}
> > +
> > static void test_secondary_do_checkpoint(void)
> > {
> > BlockBackend *top_blk, *local_blk;
> > @@ -584,6 +634,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/write", test_secondary_write);
> > g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/start", test_secondary_start);
> > g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/stop", test_secondary_stop);
> > +
> > g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/failover_then_ignore_requests",
> > + test_secondary_failover_then_ignore_requests);
> > g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/do_checkpoint",
> > test_secondary_do_checkpoint);
> > g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/get_error_all",
> > --
> > 2.20.1
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>
> Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2019 7:07 PM
> To: Zhang, Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
> Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Jason Wang
> <jasowang@redhat.com>; Wen Congyang <wencongyang2@huawei.com>;
> Xie Changlong <xiechanglong.d@gmail.com>; kwolf@redhat.com;
> mreitz@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] tests/test-replication.c: Add test for ignoring
> requests after failover
>
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:40:03 +0000
> "Zhang, Chen" <chen.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>
> > > Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 3:20 AM
> > > To: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
> > > Cc: Zhang, Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>; Jason Wang
> > > <jasowang@redhat.com>; Wen Congyang
> <wencongyang2@huawei.com>; Xie
> > > Changlong <xiechanglong.d@gmail.com>; kwolf@redhat.com;
> > > mreitz@redhat.com
> > > Subject: [PATCH v5 2/4] tests/test-replication.c: Add test for
> > > ignoring requests after failover
> > >
> > > This simulates the case that happens when we resume COLO after
> failover.
> > >
> >
> > It looks change the title to "Add test for secondary node continuous
> backup" is better.
>
> Did you mean "continuous replication"? Would "Add test for secondary node
> continuing replication" be Ok?
OK for me.
Thanks
Zhang Chen
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>
> > > ---
> > > tests/test-replication.c | 52
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/test-replication.c b/tests/test-replication.c
> > > index
> > > f085d1993a..5addfc2227 100644
> > > --- a/tests/test-replication.c
> > > +++ b/tests/test-replication.c
> > > @@ -489,6 +489,56 @@ static void test_secondary_stop(void)
> > > teardown_secondary();
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void test_secondary_failover_then_ignore_requests(void)
> >
> > Same as title, I think change to "test_secondary_continuous_backup" is
> more clear.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Zhang Chen
> >
> > > +{
> > > + BlockBackend *top_blk, *local_blk;
> > > + Error *local_err = NULL;
> > > +
> > > + top_blk = start_secondary();
> > > + replication_start_all(REPLICATION_MODE_SECONDARY, &local_err);
> > > + g_assert(!local_err);
> > > +
> > > + /* write 0x22 to s_local_disk (IMG_SIZE / 2, IMG_SIZE) */
> > > + local_blk = blk_by_name(S_LOCAL_DISK_ID);
> > > + test_blk_write(local_blk, 0x22, IMG_SIZE / 2, IMG_SIZE / 2,
> > > + false);
> > > +
> > > + /* replication will backup s_local_disk to s_hidden_disk */
> > > + test_blk_read(top_blk, 0x11, IMG_SIZE / 2,
> > > + IMG_SIZE / 2, 0, IMG_SIZE, false);
> > > +
> > > + /* write 0x33 to s_active_disk (0, IMG_SIZE / 2) */
> > > + test_blk_write(top_blk, 0x33, 0, IMG_SIZE / 2, false);
> > > +
> > > + /* do failover (active commit) */
> > > + replication_stop_all(true, &local_err);
> > > + g_assert(!local_err);
> > > +
> > > + /* it should ignore all requests from now on */
> > > +
> > > + /* start after failover */
> > > + replication_start_all(REPLICATION_MODE_PRIMARY, &local_err);
> > > + g_assert(!local_err);
> > > +
> > > + /* checkpoint */
> > > + replication_do_checkpoint_all(&local_err);
> > > + g_assert(!local_err);
> > > +
> > > + /* stop */
> > > + replication_stop_all(true, &local_err);
> > > + g_assert(!local_err);
> > > +
> > > + /* read from s_local_disk (0, IMG_SIZE / 2) */
> > > + test_blk_read(top_blk, 0x33, 0, IMG_SIZE / 2,
> > > + 0, IMG_SIZE / 2, false);
> > > +
> > > +
> > > + /* read from s_local_disk (IMG_SIZE / 2, IMG_SIZE) */
> > > + test_blk_read(top_blk, 0x22, IMG_SIZE / 2,
> > > + IMG_SIZE / 2, 0, IMG_SIZE, false);
> > > +
> > > + teardown_secondary();
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static void test_secondary_do_checkpoint(void)
> > > {
> > > BlockBackend *top_blk, *local_blk; @@ -584,6 +634,8 @@ int
> > > main(int argc, char **argv)
> > > g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/write",
> test_secondary_write);
> > > g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/start",
> test_secondary_start);
> > > g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/stop",
> > > test_secondary_stop);
> > > +
> > > g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/failover_then_ignore_request
> > > s",
> > > + test_secondary_failover_then_ignore_requests);
> > > g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/do_checkpoint",
> > > test_secondary_do_checkpoint);
> > > g_test_add_func("/replication/secondary/get_error_all",
> > > --
> > > 2.20.1
> >
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.