Hi, Marcel
On 06/05/2017 09:34 PM, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 02/06/2017 10:54, Mao Zhongyi wrote:
>> Add a comment for pci_add_capability2() to explain the return
>> value. This may help to make a correct return value check for
>> its callers.
>>
>> Cc: mst@redhat.com
>> Cc: marcel@redhat.com
>> Cc: armbru@redhat.com
>> Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mao Zhongyi <maozy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> hw/pci/pci.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
>> index 53566b8..9810d5f 100644
>> --- a/hw/pci/pci.c
>> +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
>> @@ -2276,6 +2276,10 @@ int pci_add_capability(PCIDevice *pdev, uint8_t cap_id,
>> return ret;
>> }
>> +/*
>> + * On success, pci_add_capability2() returns a positive value.
>
> Hi,
> I would specify what is the return value: the offset of the pci capability.
>
> Thanks,
> Marcel
>
Thanks, I will.
Mao
>> + * On failure, it sets an error and returns a negative value.
>> + */
>> int pci_add_capability2(PCIDevice *pdev, uint8_t cap_id,
>> uint8_t offset, uint8_t size,
>> Error **errp)
>>
>
>
>
>