softmmu/dirtylimit.c | 26 ++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
From: "alloc.young" <alloc.young@outlook.com>
Fix memory leak in hmp_info_vcpu_dirty_limit,use g_autoptr
handle memory deallocation, alse use g_free to match g_malloc
&& g_new functions.
Signed-off-by: alloc.young <alloc.young@outlook.com>
---
softmmu/dirtylimit.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/softmmu/dirtylimit.c b/softmmu/dirtylimit.c
index 3c275ee55b..fa959d7743 100644
--- a/softmmu/dirtylimit.c
+++ b/softmmu/dirtylimit.c
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static void vcpu_dirty_rate_stat_collect(void)
stat.rates[i].dirty_rate;
}
- free(stat.rates);
+ g_free(stat.rates);
}
static void *vcpu_dirty_rate_stat_thread(void *opaque)
@@ -171,10 +171,10 @@ void vcpu_dirty_rate_stat_initialize(void)
void vcpu_dirty_rate_stat_finalize(void)
{
- free(vcpu_dirty_rate_stat->stat.rates);
+ g_free(vcpu_dirty_rate_stat->stat.rates);
vcpu_dirty_rate_stat->stat.rates = NULL;
- free(vcpu_dirty_rate_stat);
+ g_free(vcpu_dirty_rate_stat);
vcpu_dirty_rate_stat = NULL;
}
@@ -220,10 +220,10 @@ void dirtylimit_state_initialize(void)
void dirtylimit_state_finalize(void)
{
- free(dirtylimit_state->states);
+ g_free(dirtylimit_state->states);
dirtylimit_state->states = NULL;
- free(dirtylimit_state);
+ g_free(dirtylimit_state);
dirtylimit_state = NULL;
trace_dirtylimit_state_finalize();
@@ -653,7 +653,8 @@ struct DirtyLimitInfoList *qmp_query_vcpu_dirty_limit(Error **errp)
void hmp_info_vcpu_dirty_limit(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
{
- DirtyLimitInfoList *limit, *head, *info = NULL;
+ DirtyLimitInfoList *info;
+ g_autoptr(DirtyLimitInfoList) head = NULL;
Error *err = NULL;
if (!dirtylimit_in_service()) {
@@ -661,20 +662,17 @@ void hmp_info_vcpu_dirty_limit(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
return;
}
- info = qmp_query_vcpu_dirty_limit(&err);
+ head = qmp_query_vcpu_dirty_limit(&err);
if (err) {
hmp_handle_error(mon, err);
return;
}
- head = info;
- for (limit = head; limit != NULL; limit = limit->next) {
+ for (info = head; info != NULL; info = info->next) {
monitor_printf(mon, "vcpu[%"PRIi64"], limit rate %"PRIi64 " (MB/s),"
" current rate %"PRIi64 " (MB/s)\n",
- limit->value->cpu_index,
- limit->value->limit_rate,
- limit->value->current_rate);
+ info->value->cpu_index,
+ info->value->limit_rate,
+ info->value->current_rate);
}
-
- g_free(info);
}
--
2.39.3
23.08.2023 10:47, alloc.young@outlook.com wrote:
> From: "alloc.young" <alloc.young@outlook.com>
>
> Fix memory leak in hmp_info_vcpu_dirty_limit,use g_autoptr
> handle memory deallocation, alse use g_free to match g_malloc
> && g_new functions.
"..use g_autoptr TO handle.." ("to" is missing).
"alse" - I guess should be "Also".
I think it is better to split this into two parts, one fixing
the memleak and another converting to g_free().
/mjt
On 2023/8/24 13:16, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 23.08.2023 10:47, alloc.young@outlook.com wrote:
>> From: "alloc.young" <alloc.young@outlook.com>
>>
>> Fix memory leak in hmp_info_vcpu_dirty_limit,use g_autoptr
>> handle memory deallocation, alse use g_free to match g_malloc
>> && g_new functions.
>
> "..use g_autoptr TO handle.." ("to" is missing).
> "alse" - I guess should be "Also".
>
I'll fix these typos in next patch.
> I think it is better to split this into two parts, one fixing
> the memleak and another converting to g_free().
Ok, I'll make another patch, Thx.
>
>
> /mjt
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 3:48 PM <alloc.young@outlook.com> wrote:
> From: "alloc.young" <alloc.young@outlook.com>
>
> Fix memory leak in hmp_info_vcpu_dirty_limit,use g_autoptr
> handle memory deallocation, alse use g_free to match g_malloc
> && g_new functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: alloc.young <alloc.young@outlook.com>
> ---
> softmmu/dirtylimit.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> [...]
> diff --git a/softmmu/dirtylimit.c b/softmmu/dirtylimit.c
> index 3c275ee55b..fa959d7743 100644
> --- a/softmmu/dirtylimit.c
> +++ b/softmmu/dirtylimit.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static void vcpu_dirty_rate_stat_collect(void)
> stat.rates[i].dirty_rate;
> }
>
> - free(stat.rates);
> + g_free(stat.rates);
> }
>
> Code optimization.
> static void *vcpu_dirty_rate_stat_thread(void *opaque)
> @@ -171,10 +171,10 @@ void vcpu_dirty_rate_stat_initialize(void)
>
> void vcpu_dirty_rate_stat_finalize(void)
> {
> - free(vcpu_dirty_rate_stat->stat.rates);
> + g_free(vcpu_dirty_rate_stat->stat.rates);
> vcpu_dirty_rate_stat->stat.rates = NULL;
>
> - free(vcpu_dirty_rate_stat);
> + g_free(vcpu_dirty_rate_stat);
> vcpu_dirty_rate_stat = NULL;
> }
>
> Likewise...
> @@ -220,10 +220,10 @@ void dirtylimit_state_initialize(void)
>
> void dirtylimit_state_finalize(void)
> {
> - free(dirtylimit_state->states);
> + g_free(dirtylimit_state->states);
> dirtylimit_state->states = NULL;
>
> - free(dirtylimit_state);
> + g_free(dirtylimit_state);
> dirtylimit_state = NULL;
>
> Likewise...
> trace_dirtylimit_state_finalize();
> @@ -653,7 +653,8 @@ struct DirtyLimitInfoList
> *qmp_query_vcpu_dirty_limit(Error **errp)
>
> void hmp_info_vcpu_dirty_limit(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
> {
> - DirtyLimitInfoList *limit, *head, *info = NULL;
> + DirtyLimitInfoList *info;
> + g_autoptr(DirtyLimitInfoList) head = NULL;
> Error *err = NULL;
>
> if (!dirtylimit_in_service()) {
> @@ -661,20 +662,17 @@ void hmp_info_vcpu_dirty_limit(Monitor *mon, const
> QDict *qdict)
> return;
> }
>
> - info = qmp_query_vcpu_dirty_limit(&err);
> + head = qmp_query_vcpu_dirty_limit(&err);
> if (err) {
> hmp_handle_error(mon, err);
> return;
> }
>
> - head = info;
> - for (limit = head; limit != NULL; limit = limit->next) {
> + for (info = head; info != NULL; info = info->next) {
> monitor_printf(mon, "vcpu[%"PRIi64"], limit rate %"PRIi64 "
> (MB/s),"
> " current rate %"PRIi64 " (MB/s)\n",
> - limit->value->cpu_index,
> - limit->value->limit_rate,
> - limit->value->current_rate);
> + info->value->cpu_index,
> + info->value->limit_rate,
> + info->value->current_rate);
> }
> -
> - g_free(info);
>
Fix memory leak.
> }
> --
> 2.39.3
>
> I'll choose the memory leak modifications to keep the patch focused on a
single
independent issue.
Anyway,
Reviewed-by: Hyman Huang(黄勇) <yong.huang@smartx.com>
--
Best regards
________________________________________
发件人: Yong Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com>
发送时间: 2023年8月24日 8:31
收件人: alloc.young@outlook.com
抄送: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
主题: Re: [PATCH] softmmu: Fix dirtylimit memory leak
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 3:48 PM <alloc.young@outlook.com<mailto:alloc.young@outlook.com>> wrote:
From: "alloc.young" <alloc.young@outlook.com<mailto:alloc.young@outlook.com>>
Fix memory leak in hmp_info_vcpu_dirty_limit,use g_autoptr
handle memory deallocation, alse use g_free to match g_malloc
&& g_new functions.
Signed-off-by: alloc.young <alloc.young@outlook.com<mailto:alloc.young@outlook.com>>
---
softmmu/dirtylimit.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
[...]
diff --git a/softmmu/dirtylimit.c b/softmmu/dirtylimit.c
index 3c275ee55b..fa959d7743 100644
--- a/softmmu/dirtylimit.c
+++ b/softmmu/dirtylimit.c
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static void vcpu_dirty_rate_stat_collect(void)
stat.rates[i].dirty_rate;
}
- free(stat.rates);
+ g_free(stat.rates);
}
Code optimization.
static void *vcpu_dirty_rate_stat_thread(void *opaque)
@@ -171,10 +171,10 @@ void vcpu_dirty_rate_stat_initialize(void)
void vcpu_dirty_rate_stat_finalize(void)
{
- free(vcpu_dirty_rate_stat->stat.rates);
+ g_free(vcpu_dirty_rate_stat->stat.rates);
vcpu_dirty_rate_stat->stat.rates = NULL;
- free(vcpu_dirty_rate_stat);
+ g_free(vcpu_dirty_rate_stat);
vcpu_dirty_rate_stat = NULL;
}
Likewise...
@@ -220,10 +220,10 @@ void dirtylimit_state_initialize(void)
void dirtylimit_state_finalize(void)
{
- free(dirtylimit_state->states);
+ g_free(dirtylimit_state->states);
dirtylimit_state->states = NULL;
- free(dirtylimit_state);
+ g_free(dirtylimit_state);
dirtylimit_state = NULL;
Likewise...
trace_dirtylimit_state_finalize();
@@ -653,7 +653,8 @@ struct DirtyLimitInfoList *qmp_query_vcpu_dirty_limit(Error **errp)
void hmp_info_vcpu_dirty_limit(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
{
- DirtyLimitInfoList *limit, *head, *info = NULL;
+ DirtyLimitInfoList *info;
+ g_autoptr(DirtyLimitInfoList) head = NULL;
Error *err = NULL;
if (!dirtylimit_in_service()) {
@@ -661,20 +662,17 @@ void hmp_info_vcpu_dirty_limit(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
return;
}
- info = qmp_query_vcpu_dirty_limit(&err);
+ head = qmp_query_vcpu_dirty_limit(&err);
if (err) {
hmp_handle_error(mon, err);
return;
}
- head = info;
- for (limit = head; limit != NULL; limit = limit->next) {
+ for (info = head; info != NULL; info = info->next) {
monitor_printf(mon, "vcpu[%"PRIi64"], limit rate %"PRIi64 " (MB/s),"
" current rate %"PRIi64 " (MB/s)\n",
- limit->value->cpu_index,
- limit->value->limit_rate,
- limit->value->current_rate);
+ info->value->cpu_index,
+ info->value->limit_rate,
+ info->value->current_rate);
}
-
- g_free(info);
Fix memory leak.
}
--
2.39.3
I'll choose the memory leak modifications to keep the patch focused on a single
independent issue.
Ok, will send a patch just to fix this issue, thx
Anyway,
Reviewed-by: Hyman Huang(黄勇) <yong.huang@smartx.com<mailto:yong.huang@smartx.com>>
--
Best regards
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.