Hi Nicolin,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2025 8:58 AM
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org;
> eric.auger@redhat.com; peter.maydell@linaro.org; jgg@nvidia.com;
> ddutile@redhat.com; berrange@redhat.com; imammedo@redhat.com;
> nathanc@nvidia.com; mochs@nvidia.com; smostafa@google.com;
> gustavo.romero@linaro.org; mst@redhat.com;
> marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com; Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>;
> Wangzhou (B) <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>; jiangkunkun
> <jiangkunkun@huawei.com>; Jonathan Cameron
> <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>; zhangfei.gao@linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] hw/arm/virt: Add support for user creatable
> SMMUv3 device
> 
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 09:46:31AM +0100, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > 1. Rebased to target-arm.next and resolved conflicts with the series
> >    [PATCH-for-10.1 v6 0/9] hw/arm: GIC 'its=off'.
> > 2. While at it, noticed an issue with RC id mappings creation
> >    and patch #1 is a fix for that.
> > 3. Patches 3 and 4 have changes because of the conflict resolution with
> the
> >    above series. I have retained the R-by tags, but encourage all to take
> >    another look in case I missed anything.
> > 4. Collected R-by and T-by tags. Thanks!.
> 
> Hi Shameer,
> 
> Thank you for the effort and the work here.
> 
> A separate topic: do you have any preparation for the vIOMMU uAPI
> patches (iommufd backends) in QEMU?
> 
> I think it should be the next step after this series, so I wonder
> if you have done some worked already to test this series.
> 
> And maybe I can start that review process in parallel, or we will
> have to wait for the vSMMU code.

Yes, I have something on top of this series that enables the accelerated
support.  I need do a bit more testing and then will send out that as an
RFC v3. Hopefully later this week.

Thanks,
Shameer

On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 08:57:37AM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
> > Thank you for the effort and the work here.
> > 
> > A separate topic: do you have any preparation for the vIOMMU uAPI
> > patches (iommufd backends) in QEMU?
> > 
> > I think it should be the next step after this series, so I wonder
> > if you have done some worked already to test this series.
> > 
> > And maybe I can start that review process in parallel, or we will
> > have to wait for the vSMMU code.
> 
> Yes, I have something on top of this series that enables the accelerated
> support.  I need do a bit more testing and then will send out that as an
> RFC v3. Hopefully later this week.

Sounds great. It'd be nicer if there is a branch to try :)

Thanks
Nicolin