hw/display/omap_lcdc.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
In omap_lcd_interrupts(), the pointer omap_lcd is dereferenced before
being check if it is valid, which may lead to NULL pointer dereference.
So move the assignment to surface after checking that the omap_lcd is valid.
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Chen <alex.chen@huawei.com>
---
hw/display/omap_lcdc.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/display/omap_lcdc.c b/hw/display/omap_lcdc.c
index fa4a381db6..2941c5c67c 100644
--- a/hw/display/omap_lcdc.c
+++ b/hw/display/omap_lcdc.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static void omap_lcd_interrupts(struct omap_lcd_panel_s *s)
static void omap_update_display(void *opaque)
{
struct omap_lcd_panel_s *omap_lcd = (struct omap_lcd_panel_s *) opaque;
- DisplaySurface *surface = qemu_console_surface(omap_lcd->con);
+ DisplaySurface *surface;
draw_line_func draw_line;
int size, height, first, last;
int width, linesize, step, bpp, frame_offset;
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ static void omap_update_display(void *opaque)
return;
}
+ surface = qemu_console_surface(omap_lcd->con);
frame_offset = 0;
if (omap_lcd->plm != 2) {
cpu_physical_memory_read(
--
2.19.1
On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 at 10:23, AlexChen <alex.chen@huawei.com> wrote: > > In omap_lcd_interrupts(), the pointer omap_lcd is dereferenced before > being check if it is valid, which may lead to NULL pointer dereference. > So move the assignment to surface after checking that the omap_lcd is valid. > > Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com> > Signed-off-by: Alex Chen <alex.chen@huawei.com> > --- > hw/display/omap_lcdc.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Applied to target-arm.next, thanks. -- PMM
On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 at 14:29, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 at 10:23, AlexChen <alex.chen@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > In omap_lcd_interrupts(), the pointer omap_lcd is dereferenced before
> > being check if it is valid, which may lead to NULL pointer dereference.
> > So move the assignment to surface after checking that the omap_lcd is valid.
> >
> > Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Chen <alex.chen@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > hw/display/omap_lcdc.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> Applied to target-arm.next, thanks.
Whoops, spoke too soon. This doesn't compile:
../../hw/display/omap_lcdc.c: In function ‘omap_update_display’:
../../hw/display/omap_lcdc.c:88:10: error: ‘surface’ may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
!surface_bits_per_pixel(surface)) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
because the early exit check
if (!omap_lcd || omap_lcd->plm == 1 || !omap_lcd->enable ||
!surface_bits_per_pixel(surface)) {
return;
}
uses 'surface' and this patch moves the initialization of that
variable down below its first use.
thanks
-- PMM
On 2020/10/30 22:35, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 at 14:29, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 at 10:23, AlexChen <alex.chen@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> In omap_lcd_interrupts(), the pointer omap_lcd is dereferenced before
>>> being check if it is valid, which may lead to NULL pointer dereference.
>>> So move the assignment to surface after checking that the omap_lcd is valid.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Chen <alex.chen@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> hw/display/omap_lcdc.c | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>> Applied to target-arm.next, thanks.
>
> Whoops, spoke too soon. This doesn't compile:
>
> ../../hw/display/omap_lcdc.c: In function ‘omap_update_display’:
> ../../hw/display/omap_lcdc.c:88:10: error: ‘surface’ may be used
> uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> !surface_bits_per_pixel(surface)) {
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
> because the early exit check
> if (!omap_lcd || omap_lcd->plm == 1 || !omap_lcd->enable ||
> !surface_bits_per_pixel(surface)) {
> return;
> }
>
> uses 'surface' and this patch moves the initialization of that
> variable down below its first use.
>
Oh, I apologize for this compilation error, I will fix it in my patch v2.
Thanks,
Alex
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.