hw/vfio/pci.c | 19 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Updates vfio_pci_load_rom() to use Error API for error propagation
instead of error_report(), improving error handling consistency.
Signed-off-by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
---
hw/vfio/pci.c | 19 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
index 9df04fa2d7..11876fd5b4 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
+++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
@@ -1027,7 +1027,7 @@ static void vfio_update_msi(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
}
}
-static bool vfio_pci_load_rom(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
+static bool vfio_pci_load_rom(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp)
{
VFIODevice *vbasedev = &vdev->vbasedev;
struct vfio_region_info *reg_info = NULL;
@@ -1040,7 +1040,7 @@ static bool vfio_pci_load_rom(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
®_info);
if (ret != 0) {
- error_report("vfio: Error getting ROM info: %s", strerror(-ret));
+ error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "vfio: Error getting ROM info");
return false;
}
@@ -1052,10 +1052,10 @@ static bool vfio_pci_load_rom(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
vdev->rom_offset = reg_info->offset;
if (!vdev->rom_size) {
- error_report("vfio-pci: Cannot read device rom at %s", vbasedev->name);
- error_printf("Device option ROM contents are probably invalid "
- "(check dmesg).\nSkip option ROM probe with rombar=0, "
- "or load from file with romfile=\n");
+ error_setg(errp, "vfio-pci: Cannot read device rom at %s. "
+ "Device option ROM contents are probably invalid "
+ "(check dmesg). Skip option ROM probe with rombar=0, "
+ "or load from file with romfile=", vbasedev->name);
return false;
}
@@ -1076,9 +1076,8 @@ static bool vfio_pci_load_rom(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
if (bytes == -EINTR || bytes == -EAGAIN) {
continue;
}
- error_report("vfio: Error reading device ROM: %s",
- strreaderror(bytes));
-
+ error_setg(errp, "vfio: Error reading device ROM: %s",
+ strreaderror(bytes));
break;
}
}
@@ -1147,7 +1146,7 @@ static uint64_t vfio_rom_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned size)
/* Load the ROM lazily when the guest tries to read it */
if (unlikely(!vdev->rom && !vdev->rom_read_failed)) {
- vdev->rom_read_failed = !vfio_pci_load_rom(vdev);
+ vdev->rom_read_failed = !vfio_pci_load_rom(vdev, NULL);
}
memcpy(&val, vdev->rom + addr,
--
2.54.0
Hello Mario,
On 6/11/26 11:43, Mario Casquero wrote:
> Updates vfio_pci_load_rom() to use Error API for error propagation
> instead of error_report(), improving error handling consistency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/vfio/pci.c | 19 +++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> index 9df04fa2d7..11876fd5b4 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> @@ -1027,7 +1027,7 @@ static void vfio_update_msi(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
> }
> }
>
> -static bool vfio_pci_load_rom(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
> +static bool vfio_pci_load_rom(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp)
> {
> VFIODevice *vbasedev = &vdev->vbasedev;
> struct vfio_region_info *reg_info = NULL;
> @@ -1040,7 +1040,7 @@ static bool vfio_pci_load_rom(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
> ®_info);
>
> if (ret != 0) {
> - error_report("vfio: Error getting ROM info: %s", strerror(-ret));
> + error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "vfio: Error getting ROM info");
> return false;
> }
>
> @@ -1052,10 +1052,10 @@ static bool vfio_pci_load_rom(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
> vdev->rom_offset = reg_info->offset;
>
> if (!vdev->rom_size) {
> - error_report("vfio-pci: Cannot read device rom at %s", vbasedev->name);
> - error_printf("Device option ROM contents are probably invalid "
> - "(check dmesg).\nSkip option ROM probe with rombar=0, "
> - "or load from file with romfile=\n");
> + error_setg(errp, "vfio-pci: Cannot read device rom at %s. "
> + "Device option ROM contents are probably invalid "
> + "(check dmesg). Skip option ROM probe with rombar=0, "
> + "or load from file with romfile=", vbasedev->name);
Here I would add :
error_setg(errp, "vfio-pci: Cannot read device rom at %s", vbasedev->name);
and keep the error_printf() as it is.
The error_setg() propagates the error and error_printf() emits
the "hint" whether the caller handles or not the error.
> return false;
> }
>
> @@ -1076,9 +1076,8 @@ static bool vfio_pci_load_rom(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
> if (bytes == -EINTR || bytes == -EAGAIN) {
> continue;
> }
> - error_report("vfio: Error reading device ROM: %s",
> - strreaderror(bytes));
> -
> + error_setg(errp, "vfio: Error reading device ROM: %s",
> + strreaderror(bytes));
May be instead :
error_setg_errno(errp, -bytes, "vfio: Error reading device ROM");
and since vdev->rom_size and vdev->rom_offset are left dirty :
g_free(vdev->rom);
vdev->rom = NULL;
vdev->rom_size = 0;
vdev->rom_offset = 0;
return false;
> break;
> }
> }
> @@ -1147,7 +1146,7 @@ static uint64_t vfio_rom_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned size)
>
> /* Load the ROM lazily when the guest tries to read it */
> if (unlikely(!vdev->rom && !vdev->rom_read_failed)) {
> - vdev->rom_read_failed = !vfio_pci_load_rom(vdev);
> + vdev->rom_read_failed = !vfio_pci_load_rom(vdev, NULL);
The NULL 'errp' parameter will silently discard the error of
vfio_pci_load_rom(). All error_setg() / error_setg_errno() calls
become no-ops.
This would be better :
Error *local_err = NULL;
vdev->rom_read_failed = !vfio_pci_load_rom(vdev, &local_err);
if (vdev->rom_read_failed) {
error_report_err(local_err);
}
Thanks,
C.
> }
>
> memcpy(&val, vdev->rom + addr,
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.