[PATCH] virtio-blk: add missing VIRTIO_BLK_T_SCSI_CMD size check (CVE-2026-48914)

Stefan Hajnoczi posted 1 patch 4 days, 1 hour ago
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/20260526154957.1741622-1-stefanha@redhat.com
Maintainers: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] virtio-blk: add missing VIRTIO_BLK_T_SCSI_CMD size check (CVE-2026-48914)
Posted by Stefan Hajnoczi 4 days, 1 hour ago
Check that the iovec containing struct virtio_scsi_inhdr is large enough
before storing an error value there.

Feifan Qian <bea1e@proton.me> pointed out that this can be used to
corrupt heap memory when the descriptor uses an MMIO address and a
length of 1, forcing QEMU to allocate a 1-byte heap bounce buffer.
virtio_stl_p() stores 4 bytes and therefore corrupts whatever is beyond
the bounce buffer.

Fixes: CVE-2026-48914
Fixes: f34e73cd69bd ("virtio-blk: report non-zero status when failing SG_IO requests")
Reported-by: Feifan Qian <bea1e@proton.me>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
---
 hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
index 9cb9f1fb2b..6b92066aff 100644
--- a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
+++ b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
@@ -199,10 +199,16 @@ static void virtio_blk_handle_scsi(VirtIOBlockReq *req)
 
     /*
      * The scsi inhdr is placed in the second-to-last input segment, just
-     * before the regular inhdr.
+     * before the regular inhdr. VIRTIO implementations normally do not rely on
+     * the precise message framing, but legacy implementations did and so we do
+     * too for the legacy virtio-blk SCSI request type.
      *
      * Just put anything nonzero so that the ioctl fails in the guest.
      */
+    if (elem->in_sg[elem->in_num - 2].iov_len != sizeof(*scsi)) {
+        status = VIRTIO_BLK_S_IOERR;
+        goto fail;
+    }
     scsi = (void *)elem->in_sg[elem->in_num - 2].iov_base;
     virtio_stl_p(vdev, &scsi->errors, 255);
     status = VIRTIO_BLK_S_UNSUPP;
-- 
2.54.0
Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: add missing VIRTIO_BLK_T_SCSI_CMD size check (CVE-2026-48914)
Posted by Kevin Wolf 1 day, 2 hours ago
Am 26.05.2026 um 17:49 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> Check that the iovec containing struct virtio_scsi_inhdr is large enough
> before storing an error value there.
> 
> Feifan Qian <bea1e@proton.me> pointed out that this can be used to
> corrupt heap memory when the descriptor uses an MMIO address and a
> length of 1, forcing QEMU to allocate a 1-byte heap bounce buffer.
> virtio_stl_p() stores 4 bytes and therefore corrupts whatever is beyond
> the bounce buffer.
> 
> Fixes: CVE-2026-48914
> Fixes: f34e73cd69bd ("virtio-blk: report non-zero status when failing SG_IO requests")
> Reported-by: Feifan Qian <bea1e@proton.me>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

> diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> index 9cb9f1fb2b..6b92066aff 100644
> --- a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> +++ b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
> @@ -199,10 +199,16 @@ static void virtio_blk_handle_scsi(VirtIOBlockReq *req)
>  
>      /*
>       * The scsi inhdr is placed in the second-to-last input segment, just
> -     * before the regular inhdr.
> +     * before the regular inhdr. VIRTIO implementations normally do not rely on
> +     * the precise message framing, but legacy implementations did and so we do
> +     * too for the legacy virtio-blk SCSI request type.
>       *
>       * Just put anything nonzero so that the ioctl fails in the guest.
>       */
> +    if (elem->in_sg[elem->in_num - 2].iov_len != sizeof(*scsi)) {
> +        status = VIRTIO_BLK_S_IOERR;
> +        goto fail;
> +    }
>      scsi = (void *)elem->in_sg[elem->in_num - 2].iov_base;
>      virtio_stl_p(vdev, &scsi->errors, 255);
>      status = VIRTIO_BLK_S_UNSUPP;

What would the guest do if we didn't update scsi->errors, but just
return VIRTIO_BLK_S_UNSUPP (i.e. remove this whole function)? Shouldn't
that result in an error, too?

Kevin
Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: add missing VIRTIO_BLK_T_SCSI_CMD size check (CVE-2026-48914)
Posted by Paolo Bonzini 2 days ago
Queued, thanks.

Paolo