Hi all,
On 2026/3/3 01:53, Eric Auger wrote:
>
> On 3/2/26 6:47 PM, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
>> On 3/1/26 4:33 AM, Tao Tang wrote:
>>> Hi Mostafa,
>>>
>>> On 2026/2/27 PM10:49, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 06:17:33PM +0800, Tao Tang wrote:
>>>>> Add a STAGE1_SUPPORTED check in the CMD_CFGI_CD and CMD_CFGI_CD_ALL
>>>>> path
>>>>> and return CERROR_ILL when stage-1 translation is not implemented,
>>>>> matching the architecture requirement (IHI 0070G.b, page 176).
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 32cfd7f39e08 ("hw/arm/smmuv3: Cache/invalidate config data")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tao Tang<tangtao1634@phytium.com.cn>
>>>> This is a separate fix, it can be sent standalone to make this series
>>>> smaller, similarly the first patch.
>>>
>>> For #1, #2 and #19 commit (this one), since I’m not fully sure about
>>> the expected process here, should I resend these already Reviewed-by
>>> fixes as standalone patch respectively right now, and try to get
>>> them merged first?
>>>
>> If a set of patches is fully ready, you can always put them first in
>> next version, and ask the maintainer to pull this one.
>> If your current series needs them to build, I usually prefer to keep
>> it all together, instead of having two different series, and using a
>> Based-on tag. But it's a personal preference, some people prefer to
>> see several series.
> Either, either send them in a separate series or put them at the
> beginning. We are approaching the soft freeze so maybe a separate series
> would be better.
Thank you all for the guide.
I’ll resend #1/#2/#19 as a small standalone fixes series with the Fixes
tags, so it can be picked up independently.
The main series will then be rebased accordingly.
Best regards,
Tao