On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 at 15:24, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/02/2026 16.12, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > The top-level test python scripts in tests/functional are supposed to
> > be marked executable; "make check-functional" doesn't care about
> > this, but it allows them to be run as standalone executables to
> > exercise a single test, as docs/devel/testing/functional.rst
> > describes.
> >
> > A couple of files have got into the tree without the executable
> > bit set: fix them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > tests/functional/arm/test_aspeed_ast1060.py | 0
> > tests/functional/ppc/test_ppe42.py | 0
> > 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > mode change 100644 => 100755 tests/functional/arm/test_aspeed_ast1060.py
> > mode change 100644 => 100755 tests/functional/ppc/test_ppe42.py
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/functional/arm/test_aspeed_ast1060.py b/tests/functional/arm/test_aspeed_ast1060.py
> > old mode 100644
> > new mode 100755
> > diff --git a/tests/functional/ppc/test_ppe42.py b/tests/functional/ppc/test_ppe42.py
> > old mode 100644
> > new mode 100755
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Thanks; I've picked this up into target-arm.next since I'm assembling
a pullreq, unless you would prefer to take it some other route.
-- PMM