Hi Connie,
On 1/27/26 6:19 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26 2026, Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> With the new infrastructure in place it is now feasible to teach
>> qemu that it is safe to ignore a sysreg in the incoming migration
>> stream. So with the plan to revert commit 4f2b82f60431 ("target/arm:
>> Reinstate bogus AArch32 DBGDTRTX register for migration compat") from
>> qemu 11.0 onwards, let's add a compat in 10.2 machine options stating
>> that this reg is safe to ignore. from 11.0 onwards we will not need
>> that register anymore.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> v4 -> v5:
>> - rebased on top of latest machine types (Connie)
>>
>> v3 -> v4:
>> - add a comment related to DBGDTRTX (Connie)
>> ---
>> hw/arm/virt.c | 10 ++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
>> index baa4e31aac1..03d5af18f26 100644
>> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
>> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
>> @@ -100,6 +100,15 @@ static GlobalProperty arm_virt_compat_defaults[] = {
>> static const size_t arm_virt_compat_defaults_len =
>> G_N_ELEMENTS(arm_virt_compat_defaults);
>>
>> +/* Register erronously exposed on 10.2 and earlier */
>> +#define DBGDTRTX 0x40200000200e0298
>> +
>> +static GlobalProperty arm_virt_compat_10_2[] = {
>> + { TYPE_ARM_CPU, "x-mig-safe-missing-regs", stringify(DBGDTRTX)},
>> +};
>> +static const size_t arm_virt_compat_10_2_len =
>> + G_N_ELEMENTS(arm_virt_compat_10_2);
>> +
> Not objecting, but we had a discussion recently regarding where compat
> values for arm cpus should live:
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20260120122108.131708-1-thuth@redhat.com/ ff.
>
> Could this become relevant for future other versioned machine types? I'd
> assume that they just would skip the bogus reg from the start, though.
Thanks for the pointer. Effectively this could have initially lived
in hw/core/machine.c but the problem specific to this array prop is that
in any case this is not something you can aggregate and this requires
infra defined in 10/11 where you register safe missing regs and hidden
regs throgh a specific helper. Currently only one machine requires this
so I would be inclined to leave it in virt arm machine code. So this
patch is something trasncient and replaced in 10/11. Thanks Eric
>
>> /*
>> * This cannot be called from the virt_machine_class_init() because
>> * TYPE_VIRT_MACHINE is abstract and mc->compat_props g_ptr_array_new()
>> @@ -3552,6 +3561,7 @@ static void virt_machine_10_2_options(MachineClass *mc)
>> {
>> virt_machine_11_0_options(mc);
>> compat_props_add(mc->compat_props, hw_compat_10_2, hw_compat_10_2_len);
>> + compat_props_add(mc->compat_props, arm_virt_compat_10_2, arm_virt_compat_10_2_len);
>> }
>> DEFINE_VIRT_MACHINE(10, 2)
>>