[PATCH RFC v3 02/12] target/arm: add TCSO bitmasks to SCTLR

Gabriel Brookman posted 12 patches 1 month ago
Maintainers: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
[PATCH RFC v3 02/12] target/arm: add TCSO bitmasks to SCTLR
Posted by Gabriel Brookman 1 month ago
These are the bitmasks used to control the FEAT_MTE_STORE_ONLY feature.
They are now named and setting these fields of SCTLR is ignored if MTE
or MTE4 is disabled, as per convention.

Signed-off-by: Gabriel Brookman <brookmangabriel@gmail.com>
---
 target/arm/cpu-features.h |  5 +++++
 target/arm/cpu.h          |  2 ++
 target/arm/helper.c       | 11 +++++++++--
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/cpu-features.h b/target/arm/cpu-features.h
index 48009b5a66..3473787ab8 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu-features.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu-features.h
@@ -1144,6 +1144,11 @@ static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_mteperm(const ARMISARegisters *id)
     return FIELD_EX64_IDREG(id, ID_AA64PFR2, MTEPERM) == 1;
 }
 
+static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_mte4(const ARMISARegisters *id)
+{
+    return FIELD_EX64_IDREG(id, ID_AA64PFR2, MTEFAR) == 1;
+}
+
 static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_sme(const ARMISARegisters *id)
 {
     return FIELD_EX64_IDREG(id, ID_AA64PFR1, SME) != 0;
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index 9579d43ba3..393bfc0dc9 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -1424,6 +1424,8 @@ void pmu_init(ARMCPU *cpu);
 #define SCTLR_EnAS0   (1ULL << 55) /* FEAT_LS64_ACCDATA */
 #define SCTLR_EnALS   (1ULL << 56) /* FEAT_LS64 */
 #define SCTLR_EPAN    (1ULL << 57) /* FEAT_PAN3 */
+#define SCTLR_TCSO0   (1ULL << 58) /* FEAT_MTE_STORE_ONLY */
+#define SCTLR_TCSO    (1ULL << 59) /* FEAT_MTE_STORE_ONLY */
 #define SCTLR_EnTP2   (1ULL << 60) /* FEAT_SME */
 #define SCTLR_NMI     (1ULL << 61) /* FEAT_NMI */
 #define SCTLR_SPINTMASK (1ULL << 62) /* FEAT_NMI */
diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index 263ca29d92..4086423b6f 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -3364,10 +3364,17 @@ static void sctlr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
 
     if (ri->state == ARM_CP_STATE_AA64 && !cpu_isar_feature(aa64_mte, cpu)) {
         if (ri->opc1 == 6) { /* SCTLR_EL3 */
-            value &= ~(SCTLR_ITFSB | SCTLR_TCF | SCTLR_ATA);
+            value &= ~(SCTLR_ITFSB | SCTLR_TCF | SCTLR_ATA | SCTLR_TCSO);
         } else {
             value &= ~(SCTLR_ITFSB | SCTLR_TCF0 | SCTLR_TCF |
-                       SCTLR_ATA0 | SCTLR_ATA);
+                       SCTLR_ATA0 | SCTLR_ATA | SCTLR_TCSO | SCTLR_TCSO0);
+        }
+    } else if (ri->state == ARM_CP_STATE_AA64
+            && !cpu_isar_feature(aa64_mte4, cpu)) { /* mte but not mte4 */
+        if (ri->opc1 == 6) { /* SCTLR_EL3 */
+            value &= ~SCTLR_TCSO;
+        } else {
+            value &= ~(SCTLR_TCSO | SCTLR_TCSO0);
         }
     }
 

-- 
2.52.0
Re: [PATCH RFC v3 02/12] target/arm: add TCSO bitmasks to SCTLR
Posted by Richard Henderson 1 month ago
On 1/6/26 05:14, Gabriel Brookman wrote:
> These are the bitmasks used to control the FEAT_MTE_STORE_ONLY feature.
> They are now named and setting these fields of SCTLR is ignored if MTE
> or MTE4 is disabled, as per convention.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Brookman <brookmangabriel@gmail.com>
> ---
>   target/arm/cpu-features.h |  5 +++++
>   target/arm/cpu.h          |  2 ++
>   target/arm/helper.c       | 11 +++++++++--
>   3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu-features.h b/target/arm/cpu-features.h
> index 48009b5a66..3473787ab8 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu-features.h
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu-features.h
> @@ -1144,6 +1144,11 @@ static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_mteperm(const ARMISARegisters *id)
>       return FIELD_EX64_IDREG(id, ID_AA64PFR2, MTEPERM) == 1;
>   }
>   
> +static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_mte4(const ARMISARegisters *id)
> +{
> +    return FIELD_EX64_IDREG(id, ID_AA64PFR2, MTEFAR) == 1;
> +}

There is no ID register field for FEAT_MTE4.

> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
> index 263ca29d92..4086423b6f 100644
> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
> @@ -3364,10 +3364,17 @@ static void sctlr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
>   
>       if (ri->state == ARM_CP_STATE_AA64 && !cpu_isar_feature(aa64_mte, cpu)) {
>           if (ri->opc1 == 6) { /* SCTLR_EL3 */
> -            value &= ~(SCTLR_ITFSB | SCTLR_TCF | SCTLR_ATA);
> +            value &= ~(SCTLR_ITFSB | SCTLR_TCF | SCTLR_ATA | SCTLR_TCSO);
>           } else {
>               value &= ~(SCTLR_ITFSB | SCTLR_TCF0 | SCTLR_TCF |
> -                       SCTLR_ATA0 | SCTLR_ATA);
> +                       SCTLR_ATA0 | SCTLR_ATA | SCTLR_TCSO | SCTLR_TCSO0);
> +        }
> +    } else if (ri->state == ARM_CP_STATE_AA64
> +            && !cpu_isar_feature(aa64_mte4, cpu)) { /* mte but not mte4 */
> +        if (ri->opc1 == 6) { /* SCTLR_EL3 */
> +            value &= ~SCTLR_TCSO;
> +        } else {
> +            value &= ~(SCTLR_TCSO | SCTLR_TCSO0);
>           }

(1) Better to refactor to eliminate duplicate checks.
(2) These bits are explicitly vs FEAT_MTE_STORE_ONLY not FEAT_MTE4.

Thus

     if (ri->state == ARM_CP_STATE_AA64) {
         if (!cpu_isar_feature(aa64_mte, cpu)) {
             ...
         } else if (!cpu_isar_feature(aa64_mte_store_only, cpu)) {
             ...
         }
     }


r~