On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 at 10:40, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> The VirtMachineClass::kvm_no_adjvtime field was only used by the
> virt-4.2 machine, which got removed. Remove it as now unused, but
> keep the ARMCPU homonym property.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> ---
> include/hw/arm/virt.h | 1 -
> hw/arm/virt.c | 5 -----
> 2 files changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/arm/virt.h b/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> index 993872bb680..c77a33f6df2 100644
> --- a/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> +++ b/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> @@ -123,7 +123,6 @@ struct VirtMachineClass {
> MachineClass parent;
> bool no_tcg_its;
> bool no_highmem_compact;
> - bool kvm_no_adjvtime;
> bool no_kvm_steal_time;
> bool acpi_expose_flash;
> bool no_secure_gpio;
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
> index b781a218019..ffbddb711f6 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
> @@ -2362,11 +2362,6 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
> object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "has_el2", false, NULL);
> }
>
> - if (vmc->kvm_no_adjvtime &&
> - object_property_find(cpuobj, "kvm-no-adjvtime")) {
> - object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "kvm-no-adjvtime", true, NULL);
> - }
> -
> if (vmc->no_kvm_steal_time &&
> object_property_find(cpuobj, "kvm-steal-time")) {
> object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "kvm-steal-time", false, NULL);
Can we / should we start the deprecate-and-drop process
for the CPU kvm-no-adjvtime property now ?
-- PMM