Adding Magnus Kulke and Wei Liu to the maintainers file for the
respective folders/files.

Signed-off-by: Magnus Kulke <magnuskulke@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index fb045388b9..e756c8b526 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -551,6 +551,21 @@ F: target/i386/whpx/
 F: accel/stubs/whpx-stub.c
 F: include/system/whpx.h
 
+MSHV
+M: Magnus Kulke <magnus.kulke@linux.microsoft.com>
+R: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
+S: Supported
+F: accel/mshv/
+F: include/system/mshv.h
+F: include/hw/hyperv/hvgdk*.h
+F: include/hw/hyperv/hvhdk*.h
+
+MSHV CPUs
+M: Magnus Kulke <magnus.kulke@linux.microsoft.com>
+R: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
+S: Supported
+F: target/i386/mshv/
+
 X86 Instruction Emulator
 M: Cameron Esfahani <dirty@apple.com>
 M: Roman Bolshakov <rbolshakov@ddn.com>
-- 
2.34.1

On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 06:48:47PM +0200, Magnus Kulke wrote:
> Adding Magnus Kulke and Wei Liu to the maintainers file for the
> respective folders/files.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Kulke <magnuskulke@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index fb045388b9..e756c8b526 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -551,6 +551,21 @@ F: target/i386/whpx/
>  F: accel/stubs/whpx-stub.c
>  F: include/system/whpx.h
>  
> +MSHV
> +M: Magnus Kulke <magnus.kulke@linux.microsoft.com>
> +R: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
> +S: Supported
> +F: accel/mshv/
> +F: include/system/mshv.h
> +F: include/hw/hyperv/hvgdk*.h
> +F: include/hw/hyperv/hvhdk*.h
> +
> +MSHV CPUs
> +M: Magnus Kulke <magnus.kulke@linux.microsoft.com>
> +R: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
> +S: Supported
> +F: target/i386/mshv/

Do you need separate groupings ? If the maintainers are the same in both
cases, and changes are liable to span both accel/mshv and target/i386/mshv
dir, then perhaps  'target/i386/mshv/' is fine being listed under the
'MSHV' group ?

Either way though

  Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>


With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 01:23:31PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:

> Do you need separate groupings ? If the maintainers are the same in both
> cases, and changes are liable to span both accel/mshv and target/i386/mshv
> dir, then perhaps  'target/i386/mshv/' is fine being listed under the
> 'MSHV' group ?

that's true. however, there is work ongoing to add MSHV support to other
targets, so eventually it wouldn't be the same maintainers for both.

On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 09:40:10AM +0200, Magnus Kulke wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 01:23:31PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> 
> > Do you need separate groupings ? If the maintainers are the same in both
> > cases, and changes are liable to span both accel/mshv and target/i386/mshv
> > dir, then perhaps  'target/i386/mshv/' is fine being listed under the
> > 'MSHV' group ?
> 
> that's true. however, there is work ongoing to add MSHV support to other
> targets, so eventually it wouldn't be the same maintainers for both.

Ok, that's sounds fine then.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|