A number of callers use monitor_cur() followed by !monitor_cur_is_qmp().
This is undesirable because monitor_cur_is_qmp() will itself call
monitor_cur() again, and monitor_cur() must acquire locks and do
hash table lookups. Introducing a monitor_cur_hmp() helper will
combine the two operations into one reducing cost.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
---
include/monitor/monitor.h | 1 +
monitor/monitor.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
stubs/monitor-core.c | 5 +++++
tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c | 1 +
4 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/monitor/monitor.h b/include/monitor/monitor.h
index 296690e1f1..c3b79b960a 100644
--- a/include/monitor/monitor.h
+++ b/include/monitor/monitor.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ typedef struct MonitorOptions MonitorOptions;
extern QemuOptsList qemu_mon_opts;
Monitor *monitor_cur(void);
+Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void);
Monitor *monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon);
bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void);
diff --git a/monitor/monitor.c b/monitor/monitor.c
index e1e5dbfcbe..cff502c53e 100644
--- a/monitor/monitor.c
+++ b/monitor/monitor.c
@@ -84,6 +84,20 @@ Monitor *monitor_cur(void)
return mon;
}
+Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void)
+{
+ Monitor *mon;
+
+ qemu_mutex_lock(&monitor_lock);
+ mon = g_hash_table_lookup(coroutine_mon, qemu_coroutine_self());
+ if (mon && monitor_is_qmp(mon)) {
+ mon = NULL;
+ }
+ qemu_mutex_unlock(&monitor_lock);
+
+ return mon;
+}
+
/**
* Sets a new current monitor and returns the old one.
*
diff --git a/stubs/monitor-core.c b/stubs/monitor-core.c
index b498a0f1af..1e0b11ec29 100644
--- a/stubs/monitor-core.c
+++ b/stubs/monitor-core.c
@@ -7,6 +7,11 @@ Monitor *monitor_cur(void)
return NULL;
}
+Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void)
{
return false;
diff --git a/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c b/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c
index bd48731ea2..d40813c682 100644
--- a/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c
+++ b/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ int monitor_get_fd(Monitor *mon, const char *fdname, Error **errp)
* otherwise we get duplicate syms at link time.
*/
Monitor *monitor_cur(void) { return cur_mon; }
+Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void) { return cur_mon; }
bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void) { return false; }
Monitor *monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon) { abort(); }
int monitor_vprintf(Monitor *mon, const char *fmt, va_list ap) { abort(); }
--
2.50.1
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
> A number of callers use monitor_cur() followed by !monitor_cur_is_qmp().
"A number of"? I can see just one:
int error_vprintf(const char *fmt, va_list ap)
{
Monitor *cur_mon = monitor_cur();
if (cur_mon && !monitor_cur_is_qmp()) {
return monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap);
}
return vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap);
}
> This is undesirable because monitor_cur_is_qmp() will itself call
> monitor_cur() again, and monitor_cur() must acquire locks and do
> hash table lookups. Introducing a monitor_cur_hmp() helper will
> combine the two operations into one reducing cost.
This made me expect the patch replaces the undesirable uses. It does
not; the new function remains unused for now.
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/monitor/monitor.h | 1 +
> monitor/monitor.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> stubs/monitor-core.c | 5 +++++
> tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/monitor/monitor.h b/include/monitor/monitor.h
> index 296690e1f1..c3b79b960a 100644
> --- a/include/monitor/monitor.h
> +++ b/include/monitor/monitor.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ typedef struct MonitorOptions MonitorOptions;
> extern QemuOptsList qemu_mon_opts;
>
> Monitor *monitor_cur(void);
> +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void);
> Monitor *monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon);
> bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void);
>
> diff --git a/monitor/monitor.c b/monitor/monitor.c
> index e1e5dbfcbe..cff502c53e 100644
> --- a/monitor/monitor.c
> +++ b/monitor/monitor.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,20 @@ Monitor *monitor_cur(void)
> return mon;
> }
>
> +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void)
> +{
> + Monitor *mon;
> +
> + qemu_mutex_lock(&monitor_lock);
> + mon = g_hash_table_lookup(coroutine_mon, qemu_coroutine_self());
> + if (mon && monitor_is_qmp(mon)) {
> + mon = NULL;
> + }
> + qemu_mutex_unlock(&monitor_lock);
> +
> + return mon;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * Sets a new current monitor and returns the old one.
> *
> diff --git a/stubs/monitor-core.c b/stubs/monitor-core.c
> index b498a0f1af..1e0b11ec29 100644
> --- a/stubs/monitor-core.c
> +++ b/stubs/monitor-core.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,11 @@ Monitor *monitor_cur(void)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void)
> {
> return false;
> diff --git a/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c b/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c
> index bd48731ea2..d40813c682 100644
> --- a/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c
> +++ b/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ int monitor_get_fd(Monitor *mon, const char *fdname, Error **errp)
> * otherwise we get duplicate syms at link time.
> */
> Monitor *monitor_cur(void) { return cur_mon; }
> +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void) { return cur_mon; }
@cur_mon is a fake here. Why do you make this fake monitor HMP? If we
somehow call error_vprintf(), it'll call monitor_vprintf(), which will
dereference the fake monitor. Best possible outcome would be an
immediate crash.
> bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void) { return false; }
> Monitor *monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon) { abort(); }
> int monitor_vprintf(Monitor *mon, const char *fmt, va_list ap) { abort(); }
On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 02:43:41PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > A number of callers use monitor_cur() followed by !monitor_cur_is_qmp().
>
> "A number of"? I can see just one:
>
> int error_vprintf(const char *fmt, va_list ap)
> {
> Monitor *cur_mon = monitor_cur();
>
> if (cur_mon && !monitor_cur_is_qmp()) {
> return monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap);
> }
> return vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap);
> }
Opps, that'll be referring to the other use of monitor_cur() in my
patches that I then removed when I re-ordered the series.
>
> > This is undesirable because monitor_cur_is_qmp() will itself call
> > monitor_cur() again, and monitor_cur() must acquire locks and do
> > hash table lookups. Introducing a monitor_cur_hmp() helper will
> > combine the two operations into one reducing cost.
>
> This made me expect the patch replaces the undesirable uses. It does
> not; the new function remains unused for now.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > include/monitor/monitor.h | 1 +
> > monitor/monitor.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > stubs/monitor-core.c | 5 +++++
> > tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c | 1 +
> > 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/monitor/monitor.h b/include/monitor/monitor.h
> > index 296690e1f1..c3b79b960a 100644
> > --- a/include/monitor/monitor.h
> > +++ b/include/monitor/monitor.h
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ typedef struct MonitorOptions MonitorOptions;
> > extern QemuOptsList qemu_mon_opts;
> >
> > Monitor *monitor_cur(void);
> > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void);
> > Monitor *monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon);
> > bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void);
> >
> > diff --git a/monitor/monitor.c b/monitor/monitor.c
> > index e1e5dbfcbe..cff502c53e 100644
> > --- a/monitor/monitor.c
> > +++ b/monitor/monitor.c
> > @@ -84,6 +84,20 @@ Monitor *monitor_cur(void)
> > return mon;
> > }
> >
> > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void)
> > +{
> > + Monitor *mon;
> > +
> > + qemu_mutex_lock(&monitor_lock);
> > + mon = g_hash_table_lookup(coroutine_mon, qemu_coroutine_self());
> > + if (mon && monitor_is_qmp(mon)) {
> > + mon = NULL;
> > + }
> > + qemu_mutex_unlock(&monitor_lock);
> > +
> > + return mon;
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * Sets a new current monitor and returns the old one.
> > *
> > diff --git a/stubs/monitor-core.c b/stubs/monitor-core.c
> > index b498a0f1af..1e0b11ec29 100644
> > --- a/stubs/monitor-core.c
> > +++ b/stubs/monitor-core.c
> > @@ -7,6 +7,11 @@ Monitor *monitor_cur(void)
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void)
> > +{
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void)
> > {
> > return false;
> > diff --git a/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c b/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c
> > index bd48731ea2..d40813c682 100644
> > --- a/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c
> > +++ b/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c
> > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ int monitor_get_fd(Monitor *mon, const char *fdname, Error **errp)
> > * otherwise we get duplicate syms at link time.
> > */
> > Monitor *monitor_cur(void) { return cur_mon; }
> > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void) { return cur_mon; }
>
> @cur_mon is a fake here. Why do you make this fake monitor HMP? If we
> somehow call error_vprintf(), it'll call monitor_vprintf(), which will
> dereference the fake monitor. Best possible outcome would be an
> immediate crash.
Current code has 'monitor_cur' return 'cur_mon', and 'monitor_cur_is_qmp'
(below) return 'false'. IOW, the current behaviour of the stubs is that
'cur_mon' is HMP, so I just maintained those semantics.
We've stubbed monitor_vprintf() too so it'll abort() no matter what, as
we don't expect that code path to be triggered from this test suite.
> > bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void) { return false; }
> > Monitor *monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon) { abort(); }
> > int monitor_vprintf(Monitor *mon, const char *fmt, va_list ap) { abort(); }
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 02:43:41PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> > A number of callers use monitor_cur() followed by !monitor_cur_is_qmp().
>>
>> "A number of"? I can see just one:
>>
>> int error_vprintf(const char *fmt, va_list ap)
>> {
>> Monitor *cur_mon = monitor_cur();
>>
>> if (cur_mon && !monitor_cur_is_qmp()) {
>> return monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap);
>> }
>> return vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap);
>> }
>
> Opps, that'll be referring to the other use of monitor_cur() in my
> patches that I then removed when I re-ordered the series.
>
>>
>> > This is undesirable because monitor_cur_is_qmp() will itself call
>> > monitor_cur() again, and monitor_cur() must acquire locks and do
>> > hash table lookups. Introducing a monitor_cur_hmp() helper will
>> > combine the two operations into one reducing cost.
I think the actual interface flaw is having monitor_cur_is_qmp().
In master, monitor_cur_is_qmp() is only used in monitor/monitor.c. Both
call sites have the value of monitor_cur() available as @cur_mon.
They'd be better off calling monitor_is_qmp(cur_mon).
Note that in master nothing outside monitor/ cares whether a monitor is
QMP or HMP. I like that.
Your series doesn't preserve this property.
You move the first call site error_vprintf() from monitor/monitor.c to
util/error-report.c in PATCH 11. QMP vs. HMP is no longer encapsulated.
Slighly irksome.
PATCH 13 replaces monitor_cur_is_qmp() by monitor_cur_hmp() there, and
PATCH 14 adds a second use.
The second call site error_vprintf() gets inlined into ui/vnc.c by PATCH
10. QMP vs. HMP leaks into ui/. Again, only slighly irksome.
We could instead preserve the status quo: error_vprintf() stays put in
monitor.c, error_printf_unless_qmp() stays around.
Independently, I feel we should drop monitor_cur_is_qmp() and not
introduce monitor_cur_hmp(). Just use monitor_cur() and
monitor_is_qmp(). Move monitor_is_qmp() from monitor-internal.h to
monitor.h if it's needed outside the monitor. Have to make it not
inline then.
>> This made me expect the patch replaces the undesirable uses. It does
>> not; the new function remains unused for now.
>>
>> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
>> > ---
>> > include/monitor/monitor.h | 1 +
>> > monitor/monitor.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> > stubs/monitor-core.c | 5 +++++
>> > tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c | 1 +
>> > 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/include/monitor/monitor.h b/include/monitor/monitor.h
>> > index 296690e1f1..c3b79b960a 100644
>> > --- a/include/monitor/monitor.h
>> > +++ b/include/monitor/monitor.h
>> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ typedef struct MonitorOptions MonitorOptions;
>> > extern QemuOptsList qemu_mon_opts;
>> >
>> > Monitor *monitor_cur(void);
>> > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void);
>> > Monitor *monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon);
>> > bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void);
>> >
>> > diff --git a/monitor/monitor.c b/monitor/monitor.c
>> > index e1e5dbfcbe..cff502c53e 100644
>> > --- a/monitor/monitor.c
>> > +++ b/monitor/monitor.c
>> > @@ -84,6 +84,20 @@ Monitor *monitor_cur(void)
>> > return mon;
>> > }
>> >
>> > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void)
>> > +{
>> > + Monitor *mon;
>> > +
>> > + qemu_mutex_lock(&monitor_lock);
>> > + mon = g_hash_table_lookup(coroutine_mon, qemu_coroutine_self());
>> > + if (mon && monitor_is_qmp(mon)) {
>> > + mon = NULL;
>> > + }
>> > + qemu_mutex_unlock(&monitor_lock);
>> > +
>> > + return mon;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > /**
>> > * Sets a new current monitor and returns the old one.
>> > *
>> > diff --git a/stubs/monitor-core.c b/stubs/monitor-core.c
>> > index b498a0f1af..1e0b11ec29 100644
>> > --- a/stubs/monitor-core.c
>> > +++ b/stubs/monitor-core.c
>> > @@ -7,6 +7,11 @@ Monitor *monitor_cur(void)
>> > return NULL;
>> > }
>> >
>> > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void)
>> > +{
>> > + return NULL;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void)
>> > {
>> > return false;
>> > diff --git a/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c b/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c
>> > index bd48731ea2..d40813c682 100644
>> > --- a/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c
>> > +++ b/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c
>> > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ int monitor_get_fd(Monitor *mon, const char *fdname, Error **errp)
>> > * otherwise we get duplicate syms at link time.
>> > */
>> > Monitor *monitor_cur(void) { return cur_mon; }
>> > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void) { return cur_mon; }
>>
>> @cur_mon is a fake here. Why do you make this fake monitor HMP? If we
>> somehow call error_vprintf(), it'll call monitor_vprintf(), which will
>> dereference the fake monitor. Best possible outcome would be an
>> immediate crash.
>
> Current code has 'monitor_cur' return 'cur_mon', and 'monitor_cur_is_qmp'
> (below) return 'false'. IOW, the current behaviour of the stubs is that
> 'cur_mon' is HMP, so I just maintained those semantics.
monitor_cur_is_qmp() below is from your PATCH 11, though.
> We've stubbed monitor_vprintf() too so it'll abort() no matter what, as
> we don't expect that code path to be triggered from this test suite.
Point! Nevermind :)
>> > bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void) { return false; }
>> > Monitor *monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon) { abort(); }
>> > int monitor_vprintf(Monitor *mon, const char *fmt, va_list ap) { abort(); }
>
>
> With regards,
> Daniel
* Markus Armbruster (armbru@redhat.com) wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 02:43:41PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > A number of callers use monitor_cur() followed by !monitor_cur_is_qmp().
> >>
> >> "A number of"? I can see just one:
> >>
> >> int error_vprintf(const char *fmt, va_list ap)
> >> {
> >> Monitor *cur_mon = monitor_cur();
> >>
> >> if (cur_mon && !monitor_cur_is_qmp()) {
> >> return monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap);
> >> }
> >> return vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap);
> >> }
> >
> > Opps, that'll be referring to the other use of monitor_cur() in my
> > patches that I then removed when I re-ordered the series.
> >
> >>
> >> > This is undesirable because monitor_cur_is_qmp() will itself call
> >> > monitor_cur() again, and monitor_cur() must acquire locks and do
> >> > hash table lookups. Introducing a monitor_cur_hmp() helper will
> >> > combine the two operations into one reducing cost.
>
> I think the actual interface flaw is having monitor_cur_is_qmp().
>
> In master, monitor_cur_is_qmp() is only used in monitor/monitor.c. Both
> call sites have the value of monitor_cur() available as @cur_mon.
> They'd be better off calling monitor_is_qmp(cur_mon).
>
> Note that in master nothing outside monitor/ cares whether a monitor is
> QMP or HMP. I like that.
>
> Your series doesn't preserve this property.
>
> You move the first call site error_vprintf() from monitor/monitor.c to
> util/error-report.c in PATCH 11. QMP vs. HMP is no longer encapsulated.
> Slighly irksome.
How about a slightly simpler approach, looking above we have:
> >> if (cur_mon && !monitor_cur_is_qmp()) {
> >> return monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap);
> >> }
> >> return vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap);
I think we could replace this with:
ret = monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap);
if (ret == -1) {
ret = vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap);
}
return ret;
monitor_vprintf already -1 exits if !mon or monitor_is_qmp(mon)
Keeps the encapsulation, and is now 'print via the monitor but if it
can't do it, use printf'
Dave
> PATCH 13 replaces monitor_cur_is_qmp() by monitor_cur_hmp() there, and
> PATCH 14 adds a second use.
>
> The second call site error_vprintf() gets inlined into ui/vnc.c by PATCH
> 10. QMP vs. HMP leaks into ui/. Again, only slighly irksome.
>
> We could instead preserve the status quo: error_vprintf() stays put in
> monitor.c, error_printf_unless_qmp() stays around.
>
> Independently, I feel we should drop monitor_cur_is_qmp() and not
> introduce monitor_cur_hmp(). Just use monitor_cur() and
> monitor_is_qmp(). Move monitor_is_qmp() from monitor-internal.h to
> monitor.h if it's needed outside the monitor. Have to make it not
> inline then.
>
> >> This made me expect the patch replaces the undesirable uses. It does
> >> not; the new function remains unused for now.
> >>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > include/monitor/monitor.h | 1 +
> >> > monitor/monitor.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >> > stubs/monitor-core.c | 5 +++++
> >> > tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c | 1 +
> >> > 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/include/monitor/monitor.h b/include/monitor/monitor.h
> >> > index 296690e1f1..c3b79b960a 100644
> >> > --- a/include/monitor/monitor.h
> >> > +++ b/include/monitor/monitor.h
> >> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ typedef struct MonitorOptions MonitorOptions;
> >> > extern QemuOptsList qemu_mon_opts;
> >> >
> >> > Monitor *monitor_cur(void);
> >> > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void);
> >> > Monitor *monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon);
> >> > bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void);
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/monitor/monitor.c b/monitor/monitor.c
> >> > index e1e5dbfcbe..cff502c53e 100644
> >> > --- a/monitor/monitor.c
> >> > +++ b/monitor/monitor.c
> >> > @@ -84,6 +84,20 @@ Monitor *monitor_cur(void)
> >> > return mon;
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void)
> >> > +{
> >> > + Monitor *mon;
> >> > +
> >> > + qemu_mutex_lock(&monitor_lock);
> >> > + mon = g_hash_table_lookup(coroutine_mon, qemu_coroutine_self());
> >> > + if (mon && monitor_is_qmp(mon)) {
> >> > + mon = NULL;
> >> > + }
> >> > + qemu_mutex_unlock(&monitor_lock);
> >> > +
> >> > + return mon;
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > /**
> >> > * Sets a new current monitor and returns the old one.
> >> > *
> >> > diff --git a/stubs/monitor-core.c b/stubs/monitor-core.c
> >> > index b498a0f1af..1e0b11ec29 100644
> >> > --- a/stubs/monitor-core.c
> >> > +++ b/stubs/monitor-core.c
> >> > @@ -7,6 +7,11 @@ Monitor *monitor_cur(void)
> >> > return NULL;
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void)
> >> > +{
> >> > + return NULL;
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void)
> >> > {
> >> > return false;
> >> > diff --git a/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c b/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c
> >> > index bd48731ea2..d40813c682 100644
> >> > --- a/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c
> >> > +++ b/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c
> >> > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ int monitor_get_fd(Monitor *mon, const char *fdname, Error **errp)
> >> > * otherwise we get duplicate syms at link time.
> >> > */
> >> > Monitor *monitor_cur(void) { return cur_mon; }
> >> > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void) { return cur_mon; }
> >>
> >> @cur_mon is a fake here. Why do you make this fake monitor HMP? If we
> >> somehow call error_vprintf(), it'll call monitor_vprintf(), which will
> >> dereference the fake monitor. Best possible outcome would be an
> >> immediate crash.
> >
> > Current code has 'monitor_cur' return 'cur_mon', and 'monitor_cur_is_qmp'
> > (below) return 'false'. IOW, the current behaviour of the stubs is that
> > 'cur_mon' is HMP, so I just maintained those semantics.
>
> monitor_cur_is_qmp() below is from your PATCH 11, though.
>
> > We've stubbed monitor_vprintf() too so it'll abort() no matter what, as
> > we don't expect that code path to be triggered from this test suite.
>
> Point! Nevermind :)
>
> >> > bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void) { return false; }
> >> > Monitor *monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon) { abort(); }
> >> > int monitor_vprintf(Monitor *mon, const char *fmt, va_list ap) { abort(); }
> >
> >
> > With regards,
> > Daniel
>
--
-----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \
\ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex /
\ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dave@treblig.org> writes:
> * Markus Armbruster (armbru@redhat.com) wrote:
>> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 02:43:41PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > A number of callers use monitor_cur() followed by !monitor_cur_is_qmp().
>> >>
>> >> "A number of"? I can see just one:
>> >>
>> >> int error_vprintf(const char *fmt, va_list ap)
>> >> {
>> >> Monitor *cur_mon = monitor_cur();
>> >>
>> >> if (cur_mon && !monitor_cur_is_qmp()) {
>> >> return monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap);
>> >> }
>> >> return vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap);
>> >> }
>> >
>> > Opps, that'll be referring to the other use of monitor_cur() in my
>> > patches that I then removed when I re-ordered the series.
>> >
>> >>
>> >> > This is undesirable because monitor_cur_is_qmp() will itself call
>> >> > monitor_cur() again, and monitor_cur() must acquire locks and do
>> >> > hash table lookups. Introducing a monitor_cur_hmp() helper will
>> >> > combine the two operations into one reducing cost.
>>
>> I think the actual interface flaw is having monitor_cur_is_qmp().
>>
>> In master, monitor_cur_is_qmp() is only used in monitor/monitor.c. Both
>> call sites have the value of monitor_cur() available as @cur_mon.
>> They'd be better off calling monitor_is_qmp(cur_mon).
>>
>> Note that in master nothing outside monitor/ cares whether a monitor is
>> QMP or HMP. I like that.
>>
>> Your series doesn't preserve this property.
>>
>> You move the first call site error_vprintf() from monitor/monitor.c to
>> util/error-report.c in PATCH 11. QMP vs. HMP is no longer encapsulated.
>> Slighly irksome.
>
> How about a slightly simpler approach, looking above we have:
>
>> >> if (cur_mon && !monitor_cur_is_qmp()) {
>> >> return monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap);
>> >> }
>> >> return vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap);
>
> I think we could replace this with:
>
> ret = monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap);
> if (ret == -1) {
> ret = vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap);
> }
> return ret;
>
> monitor_vprintf already -1 exits if !mon or monitor_is_qmp(mon)
>
> Keeps the encapsulation, and is now 'print via the monitor but if it
> can't do it, use printf'
monitor_printf() fails when passed a null monitor[*] or a QMP monitor.
Reporting the error to stderr then is probably better than swallowing
it. Same if the function somehow picks up more failure modes.
I like it.
One could perhaps object that it makes "report to HMP or else stderr"
less obvious if you don't already know that monitor_vprintf() only
prints to HMP. I'm okay with that.
[*] Feels more like a programming error, but we can ignore this
distraction.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 10:38:59AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dave@treblig.org> writes:
>
> > * Markus Armbruster (armbru@redhat.com) wrote:
> >> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 02:43:41PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> >> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> > A number of callers use monitor_cur() followed by !monitor_cur_is_qmp().
> >> >>
> >> >> "A number of"? I can see just one:
> >> >>
> >> >> int error_vprintf(const char *fmt, va_list ap)
> >> >> {
> >> >> Monitor *cur_mon = monitor_cur();
> >> >>
> >> >> if (cur_mon && !monitor_cur_is_qmp()) {
> >> >> return monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap);
> >> >> }
> >> >> return vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap);
> >> >> }
> >> >
> >> > Opps, that'll be referring to the other use of monitor_cur() in my
> >> > patches that I then removed when I re-ordered the series.
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> > This is undesirable because monitor_cur_is_qmp() will itself call
> >> >> > monitor_cur() again, and monitor_cur() must acquire locks and do
> >> >> > hash table lookups. Introducing a monitor_cur_hmp() helper will
> >> >> > combine the two operations into one reducing cost.
> >>
> >> I think the actual interface flaw is having monitor_cur_is_qmp().
> >>
> >> In master, monitor_cur_is_qmp() is only used in monitor/monitor.c. Both
> >> call sites have the value of monitor_cur() available as @cur_mon.
> >> They'd be better off calling monitor_is_qmp(cur_mon).
> >>
> >> Note that in master nothing outside monitor/ cares whether a monitor is
> >> QMP or HMP. I like that.
> >>
> >> Your series doesn't preserve this property.
> >>
> >> You move the first call site error_vprintf() from monitor/monitor.c to
> >> util/error-report.c in PATCH 11. QMP vs. HMP is no longer encapsulated.
> >> Slighly irksome.
> >
> > How about a slightly simpler approach, looking above we have:
> >
> >> >> if (cur_mon && !monitor_cur_is_qmp()) {
> >> >> return monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap);
> >> >> }
> >> >> return vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap);
> >
> > I think we could replace this with:
> >
> > ret = monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap);
> > if (ret == -1) {
> > ret = vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap);
> > }
> > return ret;
> >
> > monitor_vprintf already -1 exits if !mon or monitor_is_qmp(mon)
> >
> > Keeps the encapsulation, and is now 'print via the monitor but if it
> > can't do it, use printf'
>
> monitor_printf() fails when passed a null monitor[*] or a QMP monitor.
> Reporting the error to stderr then is probably better than swallowing
> it. Same if the function somehow picks up more failure modes.
>
> I like it.
I've tried this and it works nicely and helps me with some other
aspects too.
> One could perhaps object that it makes "report to HMP or else stderr"
> less obvious if you don't already know that monitor_vprintf() only
> prints to HMP. I'm okay with that.
'error_vprintf()' itself is already non-obvious, as you'd never
guess it implied any interaction with the monitor at all :-)
A little comment clarifies things sufficiently well.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
On 9/10/25 18:03, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > A number of callers use monitor_cur() followed by !monitor_cur_is_qmp(). > > This is undesirable because monitor_cur_is_qmp() will itself call > monitor_cur() again, and monitor_cur() must acquire locks and do > hash table lookups. Introducing a monitor_cur_hmp() helper will > combine the two operations into one reducing cost. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé<berrange@redhat.com> > --- > include/monitor/monitor.h | 1 + > monitor/monitor.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > stubs/monitor-core.c | 5 +++++ > tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c | 1 + > 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+) Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> r~
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.