A number of callers use monitor_cur() followed by !monitor_cur_is_qmp().
This is undesirable because monitor_cur_is_qmp() will itself call
monitor_cur() again, and monitor_cur() must acquire locks and do
hash table lookups. Introducing a monitor_cur_hmp() helper will
combine the two operations into one reducing cost.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
---
include/monitor/monitor.h | 1 +
monitor/monitor.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
stubs/monitor-core.c | 5 +++++
tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c | 1 +
4 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/monitor/monitor.h b/include/monitor/monitor.h
index 296690e1f1..c3b79b960a 100644
--- a/include/monitor/monitor.h
+++ b/include/monitor/monitor.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ typedef struct MonitorOptions MonitorOptions;
extern QemuOptsList qemu_mon_opts;
Monitor *monitor_cur(void);
+Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void);
Monitor *monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon);
bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void);
diff --git a/monitor/monitor.c b/monitor/monitor.c
index e1e5dbfcbe..cff502c53e 100644
--- a/monitor/monitor.c
+++ b/monitor/monitor.c
@@ -84,6 +84,20 @@ Monitor *monitor_cur(void)
return mon;
}
+Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void)
+{
+ Monitor *mon;
+
+ qemu_mutex_lock(&monitor_lock);
+ mon = g_hash_table_lookup(coroutine_mon, qemu_coroutine_self());
+ if (mon && monitor_is_qmp(mon)) {
+ mon = NULL;
+ }
+ qemu_mutex_unlock(&monitor_lock);
+
+ return mon;
+}
+
/**
* Sets a new current monitor and returns the old one.
*
diff --git a/stubs/monitor-core.c b/stubs/monitor-core.c
index b498a0f1af..1e0b11ec29 100644
--- a/stubs/monitor-core.c
+++ b/stubs/monitor-core.c
@@ -7,6 +7,11 @@ Monitor *monitor_cur(void)
return NULL;
}
+Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void)
{
return false;
diff --git a/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c b/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c
index bd48731ea2..d40813c682 100644
--- a/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c
+++ b/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ int monitor_get_fd(Monitor *mon, const char *fdname, Error **errp)
* otherwise we get duplicate syms at link time.
*/
Monitor *monitor_cur(void) { return cur_mon; }
+Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void) { return cur_mon; }
bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void) { return false; }
Monitor *monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon) { abort(); }
int monitor_vprintf(Monitor *mon, const char *fmt, va_list ap) { abort(); }
--
2.50.1
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes: > A number of callers use monitor_cur() followed by !monitor_cur_is_qmp(). "A number of"? I can see just one: int error_vprintf(const char *fmt, va_list ap) { Monitor *cur_mon = monitor_cur(); if (cur_mon && !monitor_cur_is_qmp()) { return monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap); } return vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap); } > This is undesirable because monitor_cur_is_qmp() will itself call > monitor_cur() again, and monitor_cur() must acquire locks and do > hash table lookups. Introducing a monitor_cur_hmp() helper will > combine the two operations into one reducing cost. This made me expect the patch replaces the undesirable uses. It does not; the new function remains unused for now. > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> > --- > include/monitor/monitor.h | 1 + > monitor/monitor.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > stubs/monitor-core.c | 5 +++++ > tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c | 1 + > 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/monitor/monitor.h b/include/monitor/monitor.h > index 296690e1f1..c3b79b960a 100644 > --- a/include/monitor/monitor.h > +++ b/include/monitor/monitor.h > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ typedef struct MonitorOptions MonitorOptions; > extern QemuOptsList qemu_mon_opts; > > Monitor *monitor_cur(void); > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void); > Monitor *monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon); > bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void); > > diff --git a/monitor/monitor.c b/monitor/monitor.c > index e1e5dbfcbe..cff502c53e 100644 > --- a/monitor/monitor.c > +++ b/monitor/monitor.c > @@ -84,6 +84,20 @@ Monitor *monitor_cur(void) > return mon; > } > > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void) > +{ > + Monitor *mon; > + > + qemu_mutex_lock(&monitor_lock); > + mon = g_hash_table_lookup(coroutine_mon, qemu_coroutine_self()); > + if (mon && monitor_is_qmp(mon)) { > + mon = NULL; > + } > + qemu_mutex_unlock(&monitor_lock); > + > + return mon; > +} > + > /** > * Sets a new current monitor and returns the old one. > * > diff --git a/stubs/monitor-core.c b/stubs/monitor-core.c > index b498a0f1af..1e0b11ec29 100644 > --- a/stubs/monitor-core.c > +++ b/stubs/monitor-core.c > @@ -7,6 +7,11 @@ Monitor *monitor_cur(void) > return NULL; > } > > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void) > +{ > + return NULL; > +} > + > bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void) > { > return false; > diff --git a/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c b/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c > index bd48731ea2..d40813c682 100644 > --- a/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c > +++ b/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ int monitor_get_fd(Monitor *mon, const char *fdname, Error **errp) > * otherwise we get duplicate syms at link time. > */ > Monitor *monitor_cur(void) { return cur_mon; } > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void) { return cur_mon; } @cur_mon is a fake here. Why do you make this fake monitor HMP? If we somehow call error_vprintf(), it'll call monitor_vprintf(), which will dereference the fake monitor. Best possible outcome would be an immediate crash. > bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void) { return false; } > Monitor *monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon) { abort(); } > int monitor_vprintf(Monitor *mon, const char *fmt, va_list ap) { abort(); }
On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 02:43:41PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes: > > > A number of callers use monitor_cur() followed by !monitor_cur_is_qmp(). > > "A number of"? I can see just one: > > int error_vprintf(const char *fmt, va_list ap) > { > Monitor *cur_mon = monitor_cur(); > > if (cur_mon && !monitor_cur_is_qmp()) { > return monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap); > } > return vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap); > } Opps, that'll be referring to the other use of monitor_cur() in my patches that I then removed when I re-ordered the series. > > > This is undesirable because monitor_cur_is_qmp() will itself call > > monitor_cur() again, and monitor_cur() must acquire locks and do > > hash table lookups. Introducing a monitor_cur_hmp() helper will > > combine the two operations into one reducing cost. > > This made me expect the patch replaces the undesirable uses. It does > not; the new function remains unused for now. > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> > > --- > > include/monitor/monitor.h | 1 + > > monitor/monitor.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > stubs/monitor-core.c | 5 +++++ > > tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c | 1 + > > 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/include/monitor/monitor.h b/include/monitor/monitor.h > > index 296690e1f1..c3b79b960a 100644 > > --- a/include/monitor/monitor.h > > +++ b/include/monitor/monitor.h > > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ typedef struct MonitorOptions MonitorOptions; > > extern QemuOptsList qemu_mon_opts; > > > > Monitor *monitor_cur(void); > > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void); > > Monitor *monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon); > > bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void); > > > > diff --git a/monitor/monitor.c b/monitor/monitor.c > > index e1e5dbfcbe..cff502c53e 100644 > > --- a/monitor/monitor.c > > +++ b/monitor/monitor.c > > @@ -84,6 +84,20 @@ Monitor *monitor_cur(void) > > return mon; > > } > > > > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void) > > +{ > > + Monitor *mon; > > + > > + qemu_mutex_lock(&monitor_lock); > > + mon = g_hash_table_lookup(coroutine_mon, qemu_coroutine_self()); > > + if (mon && monitor_is_qmp(mon)) { > > + mon = NULL; > > + } > > + qemu_mutex_unlock(&monitor_lock); > > + > > + return mon; > > +} > > + > > /** > > * Sets a new current monitor and returns the old one. > > * > > diff --git a/stubs/monitor-core.c b/stubs/monitor-core.c > > index b498a0f1af..1e0b11ec29 100644 > > --- a/stubs/monitor-core.c > > +++ b/stubs/monitor-core.c > > @@ -7,6 +7,11 @@ Monitor *monitor_cur(void) > > return NULL; > > } > > > > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void) > > +{ > > + return NULL; > > +} > > + > > bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void) > > { > > return false; > > diff --git a/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c b/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c > > index bd48731ea2..d40813c682 100644 > > --- a/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c > > +++ b/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c > > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ int monitor_get_fd(Monitor *mon, const char *fdname, Error **errp) > > * otherwise we get duplicate syms at link time. > > */ > > Monitor *monitor_cur(void) { return cur_mon; } > > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void) { return cur_mon; } > > @cur_mon is a fake here. Why do you make this fake monitor HMP? If we > somehow call error_vprintf(), it'll call monitor_vprintf(), which will > dereference the fake monitor. Best possible outcome would be an > immediate crash. Current code has 'monitor_cur' return 'cur_mon', and 'monitor_cur_is_qmp' (below) return 'false'. IOW, the current behaviour of the stubs is that 'cur_mon' is HMP, so I just maintained those semantics. We've stubbed monitor_vprintf() too so it'll abort() no matter what, as we don't expect that code path to be triggered from this test suite. > > bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void) { return false; } > > Monitor *monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon) { abort(); } > > int monitor_vprintf(Monitor *mon, const char *fmt, va_list ap) { abort(); } With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 02:43:41PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes: >> >> > A number of callers use monitor_cur() followed by !monitor_cur_is_qmp(). >> >> "A number of"? I can see just one: >> >> int error_vprintf(const char *fmt, va_list ap) >> { >> Monitor *cur_mon = monitor_cur(); >> >> if (cur_mon && !monitor_cur_is_qmp()) { >> return monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap); >> } >> return vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap); >> } > > Opps, that'll be referring to the other use of monitor_cur() in my > patches that I then removed when I re-ordered the series. > >> >> > This is undesirable because monitor_cur_is_qmp() will itself call >> > monitor_cur() again, and monitor_cur() must acquire locks and do >> > hash table lookups. Introducing a monitor_cur_hmp() helper will >> > combine the two operations into one reducing cost. I think the actual interface flaw is having monitor_cur_is_qmp(). In master, monitor_cur_is_qmp() is only used in monitor/monitor.c. Both call sites have the value of monitor_cur() available as @cur_mon. They'd be better off calling monitor_is_qmp(cur_mon). Note that in master nothing outside monitor/ cares whether a monitor is QMP or HMP. I like that. Your series doesn't preserve this property. You move the first call site error_vprintf() from monitor/monitor.c to util/error-report.c in PATCH 11. QMP vs. HMP is no longer encapsulated. Slighly irksome. PATCH 13 replaces monitor_cur_is_qmp() by monitor_cur_hmp() there, and PATCH 14 adds a second use. The second call site error_vprintf() gets inlined into ui/vnc.c by PATCH 10. QMP vs. HMP leaks into ui/. Again, only slighly irksome. We could instead preserve the status quo: error_vprintf() stays put in monitor.c, error_printf_unless_qmp() stays around. Independently, I feel we should drop monitor_cur_is_qmp() and not introduce monitor_cur_hmp(). Just use monitor_cur() and monitor_is_qmp(). Move monitor_is_qmp() from monitor-internal.h to monitor.h if it's needed outside the monitor. Have to make it not inline then. >> This made me expect the patch replaces the undesirable uses. It does >> not; the new function remains unused for now. >> >> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> >> > --- >> > include/monitor/monitor.h | 1 + >> > monitor/monitor.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ >> > stubs/monitor-core.c | 5 +++++ >> > tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c | 1 + >> > 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+) >> > >> > diff --git a/include/monitor/monitor.h b/include/monitor/monitor.h >> > index 296690e1f1..c3b79b960a 100644 >> > --- a/include/monitor/monitor.h >> > +++ b/include/monitor/monitor.h >> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ typedef struct MonitorOptions MonitorOptions; >> > extern QemuOptsList qemu_mon_opts; >> > >> > Monitor *monitor_cur(void); >> > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void); >> > Monitor *monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon); >> > bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void); >> > >> > diff --git a/monitor/monitor.c b/monitor/monitor.c >> > index e1e5dbfcbe..cff502c53e 100644 >> > --- a/monitor/monitor.c >> > +++ b/monitor/monitor.c >> > @@ -84,6 +84,20 @@ Monitor *monitor_cur(void) >> > return mon; >> > } >> > >> > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void) >> > +{ >> > + Monitor *mon; >> > + >> > + qemu_mutex_lock(&monitor_lock); >> > + mon = g_hash_table_lookup(coroutine_mon, qemu_coroutine_self()); >> > + if (mon && monitor_is_qmp(mon)) { >> > + mon = NULL; >> > + } >> > + qemu_mutex_unlock(&monitor_lock); >> > + >> > + return mon; >> > +} >> > + >> > /** >> > * Sets a new current monitor and returns the old one. >> > * >> > diff --git a/stubs/monitor-core.c b/stubs/monitor-core.c >> > index b498a0f1af..1e0b11ec29 100644 >> > --- a/stubs/monitor-core.c >> > +++ b/stubs/monitor-core.c >> > @@ -7,6 +7,11 @@ Monitor *monitor_cur(void) >> > return NULL; >> > } >> > >> > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void) >> > +{ >> > + return NULL; >> > +} >> > + >> > bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void) >> > { >> > return false; >> > diff --git a/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c b/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c >> > index bd48731ea2..d40813c682 100644 >> > --- a/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c >> > +++ b/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c >> > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ int monitor_get_fd(Monitor *mon, const char *fdname, Error **errp) >> > * otherwise we get duplicate syms at link time. >> > */ >> > Monitor *monitor_cur(void) { return cur_mon; } >> > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void) { return cur_mon; } >> >> @cur_mon is a fake here. Why do you make this fake monitor HMP? If we >> somehow call error_vprintf(), it'll call monitor_vprintf(), which will >> dereference the fake monitor. Best possible outcome would be an >> immediate crash. > > Current code has 'monitor_cur' return 'cur_mon', and 'monitor_cur_is_qmp' > (below) return 'false'. IOW, the current behaviour of the stubs is that > 'cur_mon' is HMP, so I just maintained those semantics. monitor_cur_is_qmp() below is from your PATCH 11, though. > We've stubbed monitor_vprintf() too so it'll abort() no matter what, as > we don't expect that code path to be triggered from this test suite. Point! Nevermind :) >> > bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void) { return false; } >> > Monitor *monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon) { abort(); } >> > int monitor_vprintf(Monitor *mon, const char *fmt, va_list ap) { abort(); } > > > With regards, > Daniel
* Markus Armbruster (armbru@redhat.com) wrote: > Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes: > > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 02:43:41PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > >> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes: > >> > >> > A number of callers use monitor_cur() followed by !monitor_cur_is_qmp(). > >> > >> "A number of"? I can see just one: > >> > >> int error_vprintf(const char *fmt, va_list ap) > >> { > >> Monitor *cur_mon = monitor_cur(); > >> > >> if (cur_mon && !monitor_cur_is_qmp()) { > >> return monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap); > >> } > >> return vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap); > >> } > > > > Opps, that'll be referring to the other use of monitor_cur() in my > > patches that I then removed when I re-ordered the series. > > > >> > >> > This is undesirable because monitor_cur_is_qmp() will itself call > >> > monitor_cur() again, and monitor_cur() must acquire locks and do > >> > hash table lookups. Introducing a monitor_cur_hmp() helper will > >> > combine the two operations into one reducing cost. > > I think the actual interface flaw is having monitor_cur_is_qmp(). > > In master, monitor_cur_is_qmp() is only used in monitor/monitor.c. Both > call sites have the value of monitor_cur() available as @cur_mon. > They'd be better off calling monitor_is_qmp(cur_mon). > > Note that in master nothing outside monitor/ cares whether a monitor is > QMP or HMP. I like that. > > Your series doesn't preserve this property. > > You move the first call site error_vprintf() from monitor/monitor.c to > util/error-report.c in PATCH 11. QMP vs. HMP is no longer encapsulated. > Slighly irksome. How about a slightly simpler approach, looking above we have: > >> if (cur_mon && !monitor_cur_is_qmp()) { > >> return monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap); > >> } > >> return vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap); I think we could replace this with: ret = monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap); if (ret == -1) { ret = vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap); } return ret; monitor_vprintf already -1 exits if !mon or monitor_is_qmp(mon) Keeps the encapsulation, and is now 'print via the monitor but if it can't do it, use printf' Dave > PATCH 13 replaces monitor_cur_is_qmp() by monitor_cur_hmp() there, and > PATCH 14 adds a second use. > > The second call site error_vprintf() gets inlined into ui/vnc.c by PATCH > 10. QMP vs. HMP leaks into ui/. Again, only slighly irksome. > > We could instead preserve the status quo: error_vprintf() stays put in > monitor.c, error_printf_unless_qmp() stays around. > > Independently, I feel we should drop monitor_cur_is_qmp() and not > introduce monitor_cur_hmp(). Just use monitor_cur() and > monitor_is_qmp(). Move monitor_is_qmp() from monitor-internal.h to > monitor.h if it's needed outside the monitor. Have to make it not > inline then. > > >> This made me expect the patch replaces the undesirable uses. It does > >> not; the new function remains unused for now. > >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> > >> > --- > >> > include/monitor/monitor.h | 1 + > >> > monitor/monitor.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > >> > stubs/monitor-core.c | 5 +++++ > >> > tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c | 1 + > >> > 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+) > >> > > >> > diff --git a/include/monitor/monitor.h b/include/monitor/monitor.h > >> > index 296690e1f1..c3b79b960a 100644 > >> > --- a/include/monitor/monitor.h > >> > +++ b/include/monitor/monitor.h > >> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ typedef struct MonitorOptions MonitorOptions; > >> > extern QemuOptsList qemu_mon_opts; > >> > > >> > Monitor *monitor_cur(void); > >> > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void); > >> > Monitor *monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon); > >> > bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void); > >> > > >> > diff --git a/monitor/monitor.c b/monitor/monitor.c > >> > index e1e5dbfcbe..cff502c53e 100644 > >> > --- a/monitor/monitor.c > >> > +++ b/monitor/monitor.c > >> > @@ -84,6 +84,20 @@ Monitor *monitor_cur(void) > >> > return mon; > >> > } > >> > > >> > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void) > >> > +{ > >> > + Monitor *mon; > >> > + > >> > + qemu_mutex_lock(&monitor_lock); > >> > + mon = g_hash_table_lookup(coroutine_mon, qemu_coroutine_self()); > >> > + if (mon && monitor_is_qmp(mon)) { > >> > + mon = NULL; > >> > + } > >> > + qemu_mutex_unlock(&monitor_lock); > >> > + > >> > + return mon; > >> > +} > >> > + > >> > /** > >> > * Sets a new current monitor and returns the old one. > >> > * > >> > diff --git a/stubs/monitor-core.c b/stubs/monitor-core.c > >> > index b498a0f1af..1e0b11ec29 100644 > >> > --- a/stubs/monitor-core.c > >> > +++ b/stubs/monitor-core.c > >> > @@ -7,6 +7,11 @@ Monitor *monitor_cur(void) > >> > return NULL; > >> > } > >> > > >> > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void) > >> > +{ > >> > + return NULL; > >> > +} > >> > + > >> > bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void) > >> > { > >> > return false; > >> > diff --git a/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c b/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c > >> > index bd48731ea2..d40813c682 100644 > >> > --- a/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c > >> > +++ b/tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c > >> > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ int monitor_get_fd(Monitor *mon, const char *fdname, Error **errp) > >> > * otherwise we get duplicate syms at link time. > >> > */ > >> > Monitor *monitor_cur(void) { return cur_mon; } > >> > +Monitor *monitor_cur_hmp(void) { return cur_mon; } > >> > >> @cur_mon is a fake here. Why do you make this fake monitor HMP? If we > >> somehow call error_vprintf(), it'll call monitor_vprintf(), which will > >> dereference the fake monitor. Best possible outcome would be an > >> immediate crash. > > > > Current code has 'monitor_cur' return 'cur_mon', and 'monitor_cur_is_qmp' > > (below) return 'false'. IOW, the current behaviour of the stubs is that > > 'cur_mon' is HMP, so I just maintained those semantics. > > monitor_cur_is_qmp() below is from your PATCH 11, though. > > > We've stubbed monitor_vprintf() too so it'll abort() no matter what, as > > we don't expect that code path to be triggered from this test suite. > > Point! Nevermind :) > > >> > bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void) { return false; } > >> > Monitor *monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon) { abort(); } > >> > int monitor_vprintf(Monitor *mon, const char *fmt, va_list ap) { abort(); } > > > > > > With regards, > > Daniel > -- -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \ \ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dave@treblig.org> writes: > * Markus Armbruster (armbru@redhat.com) wrote: >> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes: >> >> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 02:43:41PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> >> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes: >> >> >> >> > A number of callers use monitor_cur() followed by !monitor_cur_is_qmp(). >> >> >> >> "A number of"? I can see just one: >> >> >> >> int error_vprintf(const char *fmt, va_list ap) >> >> { >> >> Monitor *cur_mon = monitor_cur(); >> >> >> >> if (cur_mon && !monitor_cur_is_qmp()) { >> >> return monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap); >> >> } >> >> return vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap); >> >> } >> > >> > Opps, that'll be referring to the other use of monitor_cur() in my >> > patches that I then removed when I re-ordered the series. >> > >> >> >> >> > This is undesirable because monitor_cur_is_qmp() will itself call >> >> > monitor_cur() again, and monitor_cur() must acquire locks and do >> >> > hash table lookups. Introducing a monitor_cur_hmp() helper will >> >> > combine the two operations into one reducing cost. >> >> I think the actual interface flaw is having monitor_cur_is_qmp(). >> >> In master, monitor_cur_is_qmp() is only used in monitor/monitor.c. Both >> call sites have the value of monitor_cur() available as @cur_mon. >> They'd be better off calling monitor_is_qmp(cur_mon). >> >> Note that in master nothing outside monitor/ cares whether a monitor is >> QMP or HMP. I like that. >> >> Your series doesn't preserve this property. >> >> You move the first call site error_vprintf() from monitor/monitor.c to >> util/error-report.c in PATCH 11. QMP vs. HMP is no longer encapsulated. >> Slighly irksome. > > How about a slightly simpler approach, looking above we have: > >> >> if (cur_mon && !monitor_cur_is_qmp()) { >> >> return monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap); >> >> } >> >> return vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap); > > I think we could replace this with: > > ret = monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap); > if (ret == -1) { > ret = vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap); > } > return ret; > > monitor_vprintf already -1 exits if !mon or monitor_is_qmp(mon) > > Keeps the encapsulation, and is now 'print via the monitor but if it > can't do it, use printf' monitor_printf() fails when passed a null monitor[*] or a QMP monitor. Reporting the error to stderr then is probably better than swallowing it. Same if the function somehow picks up more failure modes. I like it. One could perhaps object that it makes "report to HMP or else stderr" less obvious if you don't already know that monitor_vprintf() only prints to HMP. I'm okay with that. [*] Feels more like a programming error, but we can ignore this distraction.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 10:38:59AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dave@treblig.org> writes: > > > * Markus Armbruster (armbru@redhat.com) wrote: > >> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes: > >> > >> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 02:43:41PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > >> >> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes: > >> >> > >> >> > A number of callers use monitor_cur() followed by !monitor_cur_is_qmp(). > >> >> > >> >> "A number of"? I can see just one: > >> >> > >> >> int error_vprintf(const char *fmt, va_list ap) > >> >> { > >> >> Monitor *cur_mon = monitor_cur(); > >> >> > >> >> if (cur_mon && !monitor_cur_is_qmp()) { > >> >> return monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap); > >> >> } > >> >> return vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap); > >> >> } > >> > > >> > Opps, that'll be referring to the other use of monitor_cur() in my > >> > patches that I then removed when I re-ordered the series. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > This is undesirable because monitor_cur_is_qmp() will itself call > >> >> > monitor_cur() again, and monitor_cur() must acquire locks and do > >> >> > hash table lookups. Introducing a monitor_cur_hmp() helper will > >> >> > combine the two operations into one reducing cost. > >> > >> I think the actual interface flaw is having monitor_cur_is_qmp(). > >> > >> In master, monitor_cur_is_qmp() is only used in monitor/monitor.c. Both > >> call sites have the value of monitor_cur() available as @cur_mon. > >> They'd be better off calling monitor_is_qmp(cur_mon). > >> > >> Note that in master nothing outside monitor/ cares whether a monitor is > >> QMP or HMP. I like that. > >> > >> Your series doesn't preserve this property. > >> > >> You move the first call site error_vprintf() from monitor/monitor.c to > >> util/error-report.c in PATCH 11. QMP vs. HMP is no longer encapsulated. > >> Slighly irksome. > > > > How about a slightly simpler approach, looking above we have: > > > >> >> if (cur_mon && !monitor_cur_is_qmp()) { > >> >> return monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap); > >> >> } > >> >> return vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap); > > > > I think we could replace this with: > > > > ret = monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap); > > if (ret == -1) { > > ret = vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap); > > } > > return ret; > > > > monitor_vprintf already -1 exits if !mon or monitor_is_qmp(mon) > > > > Keeps the encapsulation, and is now 'print via the monitor but if it > > can't do it, use printf' > > monitor_printf() fails when passed a null monitor[*] or a QMP monitor. > Reporting the error to stderr then is probably better than swallowing > it. Same if the function somehow picks up more failure modes. > > I like it. I've tried this and it works nicely and helps me with some other aspects too. > One could perhaps object that it makes "report to HMP or else stderr" > less obvious if you don't already know that monitor_vprintf() only > prints to HMP. I'm okay with that. 'error_vprintf()' itself is already non-obvious, as you'd never guess it implied any interaction with the monitor at all :-) A little comment clarifies things sufficiently well. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
On 9/10/25 18:03, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > A number of callers use monitor_cur() followed by !monitor_cur_is_qmp(). > > This is undesirable because monitor_cur_is_qmp() will itself call > monitor_cur() again, and monitor_cur() must acquire locks and do > hash table lookups. Introducing a monitor_cur_hmp() helper will > combine the two operations into one reducing cost. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé<berrange@redhat.com> > --- > include/monitor/monitor.h | 1 + > monitor/monitor.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > stubs/monitor-core.c | 5 +++++ > tests/unit/test-util-sockets.c | 1 + > 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+) Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> r~
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.