The Zvqdotq extension is the vector dot-product extension of RISC-V.
Signed-off-by: Max Chou <max.chou@sifive.com>
---
target/riscv/cpu.c | 1 +
target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc | 1 +
target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index d055ddf462..95edd02e68 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ const RISCVIsaExtData isa_edata_arr[] = {
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvksg, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvksg),
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvksh, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvksh),
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvkt, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvkt),
+ ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvqdotq, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvqdotq),
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zhinx, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zhinx),
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zhinxmin, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zhinxmin),
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(sdtrig, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, debug),
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc b/target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc
index e2d116f0df..5da59c22d6 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ BOOL_FIELD(ext_zvfbfmin)
BOOL_FIELD(ext_zvfbfwma)
BOOL_FIELD(ext_zvfh)
BOOL_FIELD(ext_zvfhmin)
+BOOL_FIELD(ext_zvqdotq)
BOOL_FIELD(ext_smaia)
BOOL_FIELD(ext_ssaia)
BOOL_FIELD(ext_smctr)
diff --git a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
index 78fb279184..7015370ab0 100644
--- a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
@@ -767,6 +767,11 @@ void riscv_cpu_validate_set_extensions(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
return;
}
+ if (cpu->cfg.ext_zvqdotq && !cpu->cfg.ext_zve32x) {
+ error_setg(errp, "Zvqdotq extension requires V or Zve* extensions");
+ return;
+ }
+
if ((cpu->cfg.ext_zvbc || cpu->cfg.ext_zvknhb) && !cpu->cfg.ext_zve64x) {
error_setg(
errp,
--
2.39.3
On 9/3/25 11:03 AM, Max Chou wrote:
> The Zvqdotq extension is the vector dot-product extension of RISC-V.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Chou <max.chou@sifive.com>
> ---
> target/riscv/cpu.c | 1 +
> target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc | 1 +
> target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index d055ddf462..95edd02e68 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ const RISCVIsaExtData isa_edata_arr[] = {
> ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvksg, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvksg),
> ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvksh, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvksh),
> ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvkt, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvkt),
> + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvqdotq, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvqdotq),
Is this really 1.12? If it's marked as experimental I would expect it be a new
extension, e.g. 1.13.
Thanks,
Daniel
> ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zhinx, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zhinx),
> ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zhinxmin, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zhinxmin),
> ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(sdtrig, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, debug),
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc b/target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc
> index e2d116f0df..5da59c22d6 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc
> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ BOOL_FIELD(ext_zvfbfmin)
> BOOL_FIELD(ext_zvfbfwma)
> BOOL_FIELD(ext_zvfh)
> BOOL_FIELD(ext_zvfhmin)
> +BOOL_FIELD(ext_zvqdotq)
> BOOL_FIELD(ext_smaia)
> BOOL_FIELD(ext_ssaia)
> BOOL_FIELD(ext_smctr)
> diff --git a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> index 78fb279184..7015370ab0 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> @@ -767,6 +767,11 @@ void riscv_cpu_validate_set_extensions(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
> return;
> }
>
> + if (cpu->cfg.ext_zvqdotq && !cpu->cfg.ext_zve32x) {
> + error_setg(errp, "Zvqdotq extension requires V or Zve* extensions");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> if ((cpu->cfg.ext_zvbc || cpu->cfg.ext_zvknhb) && !cpu->cfg.ext_zve64x) {
> error_setg(
> errp,
On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 7:14 PM Daniel Henrique Barboza <
dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 9/3/25 11:03 AM, Max Chou wrote:
> > The Zvqdotq extension is the vector dot-product extension of RISC-V.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Max Chou <max.chou@sifive.com>
> > ---
> > target/riscv/cpu.c | 1 +
> > target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc | 1 +
> > target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 5 +++++
> > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > index d055ddf462..95edd02e68 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > @@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ const RISCVIsaExtData isa_edata_arr[] = {
> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvksg, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvksg),
> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvksh, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvksh),
> > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvkt, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvkt),
> > + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvqdotq, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvqdotq),
>
> Is this really 1.12? If it's marked as experimental I would expect it be a
> new
> extension, e.g. 1.13.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniel
>
Thanks for pointing out this part. I’ll update v4 for this.
Thanks,
Max
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.