The Zvqdotq extension is the vector dot-product extension of RISC-V.
Signed-off-by: Max Chou <max.chou@sifive.com>
---
target/riscv/cpu.c | 1 +
target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc | 1 +
target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index d055ddf462..95edd02e68 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ const RISCVIsaExtData isa_edata_arr[] = {
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvksg, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvksg),
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvksh, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvksh),
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvkt, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvkt),
+ ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvqdotq, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvqdotq),
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zhinx, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zhinx),
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zhinxmin, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zhinxmin),
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(sdtrig, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, debug),
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc b/target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc
index e2d116f0df..5da59c22d6 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ BOOL_FIELD(ext_zvfbfmin)
BOOL_FIELD(ext_zvfbfwma)
BOOL_FIELD(ext_zvfh)
BOOL_FIELD(ext_zvfhmin)
+BOOL_FIELD(ext_zvqdotq)
BOOL_FIELD(ext_smaia)
BOOL_FIELD(ext_ssaia)
BOOL_FIELD(ext_smctr)
diff --git a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
index 78fb279184..7015370ab0 100644
--- a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
@@ -767,6 +767,11 @@ void riscv_cpu_validate_set_extensions(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
return;
}
+ if (cpu->cfg.ext_zvqdotq && !cpu->cfg.ext_zve32x) {
+ error_setg(errp, "Zvqdotq extension requires V or Zve* extensions");
+ return;
+ }
+
if ((cpu->cfg.ext_zvbc || cpu->cfg.ext_zvknhb) && !cpu->cfg.ext_zve64x) {
error_setg(
errp,
--
2.39.3
On 9/3/25 11:03 AM, Max Chou wrote: > The Zvqdotq extension is the vector dot-product extension of RISC-V. > > Signed-off-by: Max Chou <max.chou@sifive.com> > --- > target/riscv/cpu.c | 1 + > target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc | 1 + > target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 5 +++++ > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c > index d055ddf462..95edd02e68 100644 > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c > @@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ const RISCVIsaExtData isa_edata_arr[] = { > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvksg, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvksg), > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvksh, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvksh), > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvkt, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvkt), > + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvqdotq, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvqdotq), Is this really 1.12? If it's marked as experimental I would expect it be a new extension, e.g. 1.13. Thanks, Daniel > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zhinx, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zhinx), > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zhinxmin, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zhinxmin), > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(sdtrig, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, debug), > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc b/target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc > index e2d116f0df..5da59c22d6 100644 > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc > @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ BOOL_FIELD(ext_zvfbfmin) > BOOL_FIELD(ext_zvfbfwma) > BOOL_FIELD(ext_zvfh) > BOOL_FIELD(ext_zvfhmin) > +BOOL_FIELD(ext_zvqdotq) > BOOL_FIELD(ext_smaia) > BOOL_FIELD(ext_ssaia) > BOOL_FIELD(ext_smctr) > diff --git a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c > index 78fb279184..7015370ab0 100644 > --- a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c > +++ b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c > @@ -767,6 +767,11 @@ void riscv_cpu_validate_set_extensions(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp) > return; > } > > + if (cpu->cfg.ext_zvqdotq && !cpu->cfg.ext_zve32x) { > + error_setg(errp, "Zvqdotq extension requires V or Zve* extensions"); > + return; > + } > + > if ((cpu->cfg.ext_zvbc || cpu->cfg.ext_zvknhb) && !cpu->cfg.ext_zve64x) { > error_setg( > errp,
On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 7:14 PM Daniel Henrique Barboza < dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote: > > > On 9/3/25 11:03 AM, Max Chou wrote: > > The Zvqdotq extension is the vector dot-product extension of RISC-V. > > > > Signed-off-by: Max Chou <max.chou@sifive.com> > > --- > > target/riscv/cpu.c | 1 + > > target/riscv/cpu_cfg_fields.h.inc | 1 + > > target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 5 +++++ > > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c > > index d055ddf462..95edd02e68 100644 > > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c > > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c > > @@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ const RISCVIsaExtData isa_edata_arr[] = { > > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvksg, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvksg), > > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvksh, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvksh), > > ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvkt, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvkt), > > + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zvqdotq, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zvqdotq), > > Is this really 1.12? If it's marked as experimental I would expect it be a > new > extension, e.g. 1.13. > > > Thanks, > > Daniel > Thanks for pointing out this part. I’ll update v4 for this. Thanks, Max
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.