> On 18 Aug 2025, at 06.13, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> While working on other things cpregs related, I noticed that
> target/arm/hvf failed to produce a sorted cpreg_indexes[].
>
> I wondered if that explained the migration-test failure that
> we have, but no such luck. (I have no idea how to debug that
> test, btw; so far it is still just a mysterious SIGSEGV.)
>
>
> r~
>
>
> Richard Henderson (7):
> target/arm: Introduce KVMID_AA64_SYS_REG64
> target/arm: Move compare_u64 to helper.c
> target/arm/hvf: Split out sysreg.c.inc
> target/arm/hvf: Add KVMID_TO_HVF, HVF_TO_KVMID
> target/arm/hvf: Remove hvf_sreg_match.key
> target/arm/hvf: Replace hvf_sreg_match with hvf_sreg_list
> target/arm/hvf: Sort the cpreg_indexes array
>
> target/arm/cpregs.h | 3 +
> target/arm/kvm-consts.h | 11 ++
> target/arm/helper.c | 11 ++
> target/arm/hvf/hvf.c | 230 +++++++++---------------------------
> target/arm/kvm.c | 11 --
> target/arm/hvf/sysreg.c.inc | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 6 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 target/arm/hvf/sysreg.c.inc
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
I noted the issue with HV_SYS_REG_MDCR_EL2, but assume we'll fix it down
the line.
For the series:
Reviewed-by: Mads Ynddal <mads@ynddal.dk>