[PATCH v6 05/13] hw/arm, target/arm: nested virtualisation on HVF

Mohamed Mediouni posted 13 patches 4 months, 1 week ago
Maintainers: Cameron Esfahani <dirty@apple.com>, Roman Bolshakov <rbolshakov@ddn.com>, Phil Dennis-Jordan <phil@philjordan.eu>, Mads Ynddal <mads@ynddal.dk>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>, Ani Sinha <anisinha@redhat.com>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@csgraf.de>
[PATCH v6 05/13] hw/arm, target/arm: nested virtualisation on HVF
Posted by Mohamed Mediouni 4 months, 1 week ago
Signed-off-by: Mohamed Mediouni <mohamed@unpredictable.fr>
---
 hw/arm/virt.c         |  9 ++++++---
 target/arm/hvf-stub.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
 target/arm/hvf/hvf.c  | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 target/arm/hvf_arm.h  |  3 +++
 4 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
index 59e6c2b9df..91d8cd9363 100644
--- a/hw/arm/virt.c
+++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
@@ -817,8 +817,7 @@ static void create_gic(VirtMachineState *vms, MemoryRegion *mem)
         g_assert_not_reached();
     }
 
-    if (kvm_enabled() && vms->virt &&
-        (revision != 3 || !kvm_irqchip_in_kernel())) {
+    if (kvm_enabled() && vms->virt && (revision != 3 || !kvm_irqchip_in_kernel())) {
         error_report("KVM EL2 is only supported with in-kernel GICv3");
         exit(1);
     }
@@ -2281,7 +2280,8 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
         exit(1);
     }
 
-    if (vms->virt && !kvm_enabled() && !tcg_enabled() && !qtest_enabled()) {
+    if (vms->virt && !kvm_enabled() && !tcg_enabled()
+       && !hvf_enabled() && !qtest_enabled()) {
         error_report("mach-virt: %s does not support providing "
                      "Virtualization extensions to the guest CPU",
                      current_accel_name());
@@ -2553,6 +2553,9 @@ static void virt_set_virt(Object *obj, bool value, Error **errp)
     VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(obj);
 
     vms->virt = value;
+#if defined(CONFIG_HVF) && defined(__aarch64__)
+    hvf_arm_el2_enable(value);
+#endif
 }
 
 static bool virt_get_highmem(Object *obj, Error **errp)
diff --git a/target/arm/hvf-stub.c b/target/arm/hvf-stub.c
index ff137267a0..95ec4ea62f 100644
--- a/target/arm/hvf-stub.c
+++ b/target/arm/hvf-stub.c
@@ -18,3 +18,18 @@ uint32_t hvf_arm_get_max_ipa_bit_size(void)
 {
     g_assert_not_reached();
 }
+
+bool hvf_arm_el2_supported(void)
+{
+    g_assert_not_reached();
+}
+
+bool hvf_arm_el2_enabled(void)
+{
+    g_assert_not_reached();
+}
+
+void hvf_arm_el2_enable(bool)
+{
+    g_assert_not_reached();
+}
diff --git a/target/arm/hvf/hvf.c b/target/arm/hvf/hvf.c
index 460782dbc0..483a50329b 100644
--- a/target/arm/hvf/hvf.c
+++ b/target/arm/hvf/hvf.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
 #include "system/address-spaces.h"
 #include "system/memory.h"
 #include "hw/boards.h"
+#include "hw/arm/virt.h"
 #include "hw/irq.h"
 #include "qemu/main-loop.h"
 #include "system/cpus.h"
@@ -891,6 +892,10 @@ static bool hvf_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
                      (1ULL << ARM_FEATURE_PMU) |
                      (1ULL << ARM_FEATURE_GENERIC_TIMER);
 
+    if (hvf_arm_el2_enabled()) {
+        ahcf->features |= 1ULL << ARM_FEATURE_EL2;
+    }
+
     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(regs); i++) {
         r |= hv_vcpu_config_get_feature_reg(hv_vcpu_config, regs[i].reg, regs[i].val);
     }
@@ -958,6 +963,25 @@ uint32_t hvf_arm_get_max_ipa_bit_size(void)
     return round_down_to_parange_bit_size(max_ipa_size);
 }
 
+bool hvf_arm_el2_supported(void)
+{
+    bool is_nested_virt_supported;
+    hv_return_t ret = hv_vm_config_get_el2_supported(&is_nested_virt_supported);
+    assert_hvf_ok(ret);
+    return is_nested_virt_supported;
+}
+
+static bool is_nested_virt_enabled = false;
+bool hvf_arm_el2_enabled(void)
+{
+    return is_nested_virt_enabled;
+}
+
+void hvf_arm_el2_enable(bool enable)
+{
+    is_nested_virt_enabled = enable;
+}
+
 void hvf_arm_set_cpu_features_from_host(ARMCPU *cpu)
 {
     if (!arm_host_cpu_features.dtb_compatible) {
@@ -994,6 +1018,13 @@ hv_return_t hvf_arch_vm_create(MachineState *ms, uint32_t pa_range)
     }
     chosen_ipa_bit_size = pa_range;
 
+    if (hvf_arm_el2_enabled()) {
+        ret = hv_vm_config_set_el2_enabled(config, true);
+        if (ret != HV_SUCCESS) {
+            goto cleanup;
+        }
+    }
+
     ret = hv_vm_create(config);
 
 cleanup:
@@ -1101,6 +1132,13 @@ static void hvf_psci_cpu_off(ARMCPU *arm_cpu)
     assert(ret == QEMU_ARM_POWERCTL_RET_SUCCESS);
 }
 
+static int hvf_psci_get_target_el(void)
+{
+    if (hvf_arm_el2_enabled()) {
+        return 2;
+    }
+    return 1;
+}
 /*
  * Handle a PSCI call.
  *
@@ -1122,7 +1160,6 @@ static bool hvf_handle_psci_call(CPUState *cpu)
     CPUState *target_cpu_state;
     ARMCPU *target_cpu;
     target_ulong entry;
-    int target_el = 1;
     int32_t ret = 0;
 
     trace_hvf_psci_call(param[0], param[1], param[2], param[3],
@@ -1176,7 +1213,7 @@ static bool hvf_handle_psci_call(CPUState *cpu)
         entry = param[2];
         context_id = param[3];
         ret = arm_set_cpu_on(mpidr, entry, context_id,
-                             target_el, target_aarch64);
+                             hvf_psci_get_target_el(), target_aarch64);
         break;
     case QEMU_PSCI_0_1_FN_CPU_OFF:
     case QEMU_PSCI_0_2_FN_CPU_OFF:
diff --git a/target/arm/hvf_arm.h b/target/arm/hvf_arm.h
index ea82f2691d..bf55e7ae28 100644
--- a/target/arm/hvf_arm.h
+++ b/target/arm/hvf_arm.h
@@ -24,5 +24,8 @@ void hvf_arm_set_cpu_features_from_host(ARMCPU *cpu);
 
 uint32_t hvf_arm_get_default_ipa_bit_size(void);
 uint32_t hvf_arm_get_max_ipa_bit_size(void);
+bool hvf_arm_el2_supported(void);
+bool hvf_arm_el2_enabled(void);
+void hvf_arm_el2_enable(bool);
 
 #endif
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)
Re: [PATCH v6 05/13] hw/arm, target/arm: nested virtualisation on HVF
Posted by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 4 months ago
On 8/8/25 09:01, Mohamed Mediouni wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Mohamed Mediouni <mohamed@unpredictable.fr>
> ---
>   hw/arm/virt.c         |  9 ++++++---
>   target/arm/hvf-stub.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>   target/arm/hvf/hvf.c  | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   target/arm/hvf_arm.h  |  3 +++
>   4 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

I'm getting HV_UNSUPPORTED on Silicon M1, I suppose because this
method is not being called in this series (is there a patch missing?):

> +bool hvf_arm_el2_supported(void)
> +{
> +    bool is_nested_virt_supported;
> +    hv_return_t ret = hv_vm_config_get_el2_supported(&is_nested_virt_supported);
> +    assert_hvf_ok(ret);
> +    return is_nested_virt_supported;
> +}
Re: [PATCH v6 05/13] hw/arm, target/arm: nested virtualisation on HVF
Posted by Mohamed Mediouni 4 months ago

> On 11. Aug 2025, at 14:47, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> I'm getting HV_UNSUPPORTED on Silicon M1, I suppose because this
> method is not being called in this series (is there a patch missing?):
Nested virt is only supported by macOS on Apple M3 and later

Re: [PATCH v6 05/13] hw/arm, target/arm: nested virtualisation on HVF
Posted by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 4 months ago
On 11/8/25 15:35, Mohamed Mediouni wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 11. Aug 2025, at 14:47, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm getting HV_UNSUPPORTED on Silicon M1, I suppose because this
>> method is not being called in this series (is there a patch missing?):
> Nested virt is only supported by macOS on Apple M3 and later

I know, but maybe this is what we need to report to users trying to
enable it, rather than aborting ;)

Re: [PATCH v6 05/13] hw/arm, target/arm: nested virtualisation on HVF
Posted by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 4 months ago
On 8/8/25 09:01, Mohamed Mediouni wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Mohamed Mediouni <mohamed@unpredictable.fr>
> ---
>   hw/arm/virt.c         |  9 ++++++---
>   target/arm/hvf-stub.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>   target/arm/hvf/hvf.c  | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   target/arm/hvf_arm.h  |  3 +++
>   4 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
> index 59e6c2b9df..91d8cd9363 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
> @@ -817,8 +817,7 @@ static void create_gic(VirtMachineState *vms, MemoryRegion *mem)
>           g_assert_not_reached();
>       }
>   
> -    if (kvm_enabled() && vms->virt &&
> -        (revision != 3 || !kvm_irqchip_in_kernel())) {
> +    if (kvm_enabled() && vms->virt && (revision != 3 || !kvm_irqchip_in_kernel())) {
>           error_report("KVM EL2 is only supported with in-kernel GICv3");
>           exit(1);
>       }
> @@ -2281,7 +2280,8 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
>           exit(1);
>       }
>   
> -    if (vms->virt && !kvm_enabled() && !tcg_enabled() && !qtest_enabled()) {
> +    if (vms->virt && !kvm_enabled() && !tcg_enabled()
> +       && !hvf_enabled() && !qtest_enabled()) {
>           error_report("mach-virt: %s does not support providing "
>                        "Virtualization extensions to the guest CPU",
>                        current_accel_name());
> @@ -2553,6 +2553,9 @@ static void virt_set_virt(Object *obj, bool value, Error **errp)
>       VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(obj);
>   
>       vms->virt = value;
> +#if defined(CONFIG_HVF) && defined(__aarch64__)
> +    hvf_arm_el2_enable(value);
> +#endif
>   }
We don't have hvf_arm_el1_enable(). I think we just want to always
provide the most performant configuration to users.
IOW, we don't need hvf_arm_el2_enable(). I'd just always enable EL2
(if supported) in hvf_arm_get_host_cpu_features().
Re: [PATCH v6 05/13] hw/arm, target/arm: nested virtualisation on HVF
Posted by Mohamed Mediouni 4 months ago

> On 11. Aug 2025, at 14:56, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> On 8/8/25 09:01, Mohamed Mediouni wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Mohamed Mediouni <mohamed@unpredictable.fr>
>> ---
>>  hw/arm/virt.c         |  9 ++++++---
>>  target/arm/hvf-stub.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>  target/arm/hvf/hvf.c  | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  target/arm/hvf_arm.h  |  3 +++
>>  4 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
>> index 59e6c2b9df..91d8cd9363 100644
>> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
>> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
>> @@ -817,8 +817,7 @@ static void create_gic(VirtMachineState *vms, MemoryRegion *mem)
>>          g_assert_not_reached();
>>      }
>>  -    if (kvm_enabled() && vms->virt &&
>> -        (revision != 3 || !kvm_irqchip_in_kernel())) {
>> +    if (kvm_enabled() && vms->virt && (revision != 3 || !kvm_irqchip_in_kernel())) {
>>          error_report("KVM EL2 is only supported with in-kernel GICv3");
>>          exit(1);
>>      }
>> @@ -2281,7 +2280,8 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
>>          exit(1);
>>      }
>>  -    if (vms->virt && !kvm_enabled() && !tcg_enabled() && !qtest_enabled()) {
>> +    if (vms->virt && !kvm_enabled() && !tcg_enabled()
>> +       && !hvf_enabled() && !qtest_enabled()) {
>>          error_report("mach-virt: %s does not support providing "
>>                       "Virtualization extensions to the guest CPU",
>>                       current_accel_name());
>> @@ -2553,6 +2553,9 @@ static void virt_set_virt(Object *obj, bool value, Error **errp)
>>      VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(obj);
>>        vms->virt = value;
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_HVF) && defined(__aarch64__)
>> +    hvf_arm_el2_enable(value);
>> +#endif
>>  }
> We don't have hvf_arm_el1_enable(). I think we just want to always
> provide the most performant configuration to users.
> IOW, we don't need hvf_arm_el2_enable(). I'd just always enable EL2
> (if supported) in hvf_arm_get_host_cpu_features().
A different feature set is exposed when EL2 is enabled. For example, SME is not currently exposed in that mode.

(We currently disable SME in Qemu anyway but that’s something I plan to take care of)
Re: [PATCH v6 05/13] hw/arm, target/arm: nested virtualisation on HVF
Posted by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 4 months ago
On 11/8/25 14:56, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 8/8/25 09:01, Mohamed Mediouni wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Mohamed Mediouni <mohamed@unpredictable.fr>
>> ---
>>   hw/arm/virt.c         |  9 ++++++---
>>   target/arm/hvf-stub.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>   target/arm/hvf/hvf.c  | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   target/arm/hvf_arm.h  |  3 +++
>>   4 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
>> index 59e6c2b9df..91d8cd9363 100644
>> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
>> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
>> @@ -817,8 +817,7 @@ static void create_gic(VirtMachineState *vms, 
>> MemoryRegion *mem)
>>           g_assert_not_reached();
>>       }
>> -    if (kvm_enabled() && vms->virt &&
>> -        (revision != 3 || !kvm_irqchip_in_kernel())) {
>> +    if (kvm_enabled() && vms->virt && (revision != 3 || ! 
>> kvm_irqchip_in_kernel())) {
>>           error_report("KVM EL2 is only supported with in-kernel GICv3");
>>           exit(1);
>>       }
>> @@ -2281,7 +2280,8 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
>>           exit(1);
>>       }
>> -    if (vms->virt && !kvm_enabled() && !tcg_enabled() && ! 
>> qtest_enabled()) {
>> +    if (vms->virt && !kvm_enabled() && !tcg_enabled()
>> +       && !hvf_enabled() && !qtest_enabled()) {
>>           error_report("mach-virt: %s does not support providing "
>>                        "Virtualization extensions to the guest CPU",
>>                        current_accel_name());
>> @@ -2553,6 +2553,9 @@ static void virt_set_virt(Object *obj, bool 
>> value, Error **errp)
>>       VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(obj);
>>       vms->virt = value;
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_HVF) && defined(__aarch64__)
>> +    hvf_arm_el2_enable(value);
>> +#endif
>>   }

> We don't have hvf_arm_el1_enable(). I think we just want to always
> provide the most performant configuration to users.
> IOW, we don't need hvf_arm_el2_enable(). I'd just always enable EL2
> (if supported) in hvf_arm_get_host_cpu_features().

We create vCPUs in machvirt_init(). Upon vCPU INITialization, we check
host features. Then during REALIZation, we check the QOM properties.
If 'virt' flag is disabled, machvirt_init() sets "has_el2" property
to false, effectively setting ARMCPU::has_el2 field to %false.
In arm_cpu_realizefn(), if ARMCPU::has_el2 we unset ARM_FEATURE_EL2.