Table A-5 of the Intel manual incorrectly lists the third operand of
VINSERTx128 as Wqq, but it is actually a 128-bit value.  This is
visible when W is a memory operand close to the end of the page.

Fixes the recently-added poly1305_kunit test in linux-next.

(No testcase yet, but I plan to modify test-avx2 to use memory
close to the end of the page.  This would work because the test
vectors correctly have the memory operand as xmm2/m128).

Reported-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Fixes: 79068477686 ("target/i386: reimplement 0x0f 0x3a, add AVX", 2022-10-18)
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 target/i386/tcg/decode-new.c.inc | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/i386/tcg/decode-new.c.inc b/target/i386/tcg/decode-new.c.inc
index 853b1c8bf95..51038657f0f 100644
--- a/target/i386/tcg/decode-new.c.inc
+++ b/target/i386/tcg/decode-new.c.inc
@@ -878,10 +878,10 @@ static const X86OpEntry opcodes_0F3A[256] = {
     [0x0e] = X86_OP_ENTRY4(VPBLENDW,   V,x,  H,x,  W,x,  vex4 cpuid(SSE41) avx2_256 p_66),
     [0x0f] = X86_OP_ENTRY4(PALIGNR,    V,x,  H,x,  W,x,  vex4 cpuid(SSSE3) mmx avx2_256 p_00_66),
 
-    [0x18] = X86_OP_ENTRY4(VINSERTx128,  V,qq, H,qq, W,qq, vex6 chk(W0) cpuid(AVX) p_66),
+    [0x18] = X86_OP_ENTRY4(VINSERTx128,  V,qq, H,qq, W,dq, vex6 chk(W0) cpuid(AVX) p_66),
     [0x19] = X86_OP_ENTRY3(VEXTRACTx128, W,dq, V,qq, I,b,  vex6 chk(W0) cpuid(AVX) p_66),
 
-    [0x38] = X86_OP_ENTRY4(VINSERTx128,  V,qq, H,qq, W,qq, vex6 chk(W0) cpuid(AVX2) p_66),
+    [0x38] = X86_OP_ENTRY4(VINSERTx128,  V,qq, H,qq, W,dq, vex6 chk(W0) cpuid(AVX2) p_66),
     [0x39] = X86_OP_ENTRY3(VEXTRACTx128, W,dq, V,qq, I,b,  vex6 chk(W0) cpuid(AVX2) p_66),
 
     /* Listed incorrectly as type 4 */
-- 
2.50.1