[PATCH v2 030/101] target/arm: Implement SME2 Multiple Vectors SVE Destructive

Richard Henderson posted 101 patches 4 months, 3 weeks ago
Maintainers: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v2 030/101] target/arm: Implement SME2 Multiple Vectors SVE Destructive
Posted by Richard Henderson 4 months, 3 weeks ago
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
 target/arm/tcg/translate-sme.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 target/arm/tcg/sme.decode      | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 101 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/translate-sme.c b/target/arm/tcg/translate-sme.c
index 0e05153924..617621d663 100644
--- a/target/arm/tcg/translate-sme.c
+++ b/target/arm/tcg/translate-sme.c
@@ -550,6 +550,37 @@ TRANS_FEAT(SRSHL_n1, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_n1, a, gen_gvec_srshl)
 TRANS_FEAT(URSHL_n1, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_n1, a, gen_gvec_urshl)
 TRANS_FEAT(SQDMULH_n1, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_n1, a, gen_gvec_sve2_sqdmulh)
 
+static bool do_z2z_nn(DisasContext *s, arg_z2z_en *a, GVecGen3Fn *fn)
+{
+    int esz, dn, dm, vsz, n;
+
+    if (!sme_sm_enabled_check(s)) {
+        return true;
+    }
+
+    esz = a->esz;
+    n = a->n;
+    dn = a->zdn;
+    dm = a->zm;
+    vsz = streaming_vec_reg_size(s);
+
+    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+        int dofs = vec_full_reg_offset(s, dn + i);
+        int mofs = vec_full_reg_offset(s, dm + i);
+
+        fn(esz, dofs, dofs, mofs, vsz, vsz);
+    }
+    return true;
+}
+
+TRANS_FEAT(SMAX_nn, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_nn, a, tcg_gen_gvec_smax)
+TRANS_FEAT(SMIN_nn, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_nn, a, tcg_gen_gvec_smin)
+TRANS_FEAT(UMAX_nn, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_nn, a, tcg_gen_gvec_umax)
+TRANS_FEAT(UMIN_nn, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_nn, a, tcg_gen_gvec_umin)
+TRANS_FEAT(SRSHL_nn, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_nn, a, gen_gvec_srshl)
+TRANS_FEAT(URSHL_nn, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_nn, a, gen_gvec_urshl)
+TRANS_FEAT(SQDMULH_nn, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_nn, a, gen_gvec_sve2_sqdmulh)
+
 static bool do_z2z_n1_fpst(DisasContext *s, arg_z2z_en *a,
                            gen_helper_gvec_3_ptr * const fns[4])
 {
@@ -587,6 +618,36 @@ static bool do_z2z_n1_fpst(DisasContext *s, arg_z2z_en *a,
     return true;
 }
 
+static bool do_z2z_nn_fpst(DisasContext *s, arg_z2z_en *a,
+                           gen_helper_gvec_3_ptr * const fns[4])
+{
+    int esz = a->esz, n, dn, dm, vsz;
+    gen_helper_gvec_3_ptr *fn;
+    TCGv_ptr fpst;
+
+    if (esz == MO_8 && !dc_isar_feature(aa64_sme2_b16b16, s)) {
+        return false;
+    }
+    if (!sme_sm_enabled_check(s)) {
+        return true;
+    }
+
+    fpst = fpstatus_ptr(esz == MO_16 ? FPST_A64_F16 : FPST_A64);
+    fn = fns[esz];
+    n = a->n;
+    dn = a->zdn;
+    dm = a->zm;
+    vsz = streaming_vec_reg_size(s);
+
+    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+        int dofs = vec_full_reg_offset(s, dn + i);
+        int mofs = vec_full_reg_offset(s, dm + i);
+
+        tcg_gen_gvec_3_ptr(dofs, dofs, mofs, fpst, vsz, vsz, 0, fn);
+    }
+    return true;
+}
+
 static gen_helper_gvec_3_ptr * const f_vector_fmax[2][4] = {
     { gen_helper_gvec_fmax_b16,
       gen_helper_gvec_fmax_h,
@@ -598,6 +659,7 @@ static gen_helper_gvec_3_ptr * const f_vector_fmax[2][4] = {
       gen_helper_gvec_ah_fmax_d },
 };
 TRANS_FEAT(FMAX_n1, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_n1_fpst, a, f_vector_fmax[s->fpcr_ah])
+TRANS_FEAT(FMAX_nn, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_nn_fpst, a, f_vector_fmax[s->fpcr_ah])
 
 static gen_helper_gvec_3_ptr * const f_vector_fmin[2][4] = {
     { gen_helper_gvec_fmin_b16,
@@ -610,6 +672,7 @@ static gen_helper_gvec_3_ptr * const f_vector_fmin[2][4] = {
       gen_helper_gvec_ah_fmin_d },
 };
 TRANS_FEAT(FMIN_n1, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_n1_fpst, a, f_vector_fmin[s->fpcr_ah])
+TRANS_FEAT(FMIN_nn, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_nn_fpst, a, f_vector_fmin[s->fpcr_ah])
 
 static gen_helper_gvec_3_ptr * const f_vector_fmaxnm[4] = {
     gen_helper_gvec_fmaxnum_b16,
@@ -618,6 +681,7 @@ static gen_helper_gvec_3_ptr * const f_vector_fmaxnm[4] = {
     gen_helper_gvec_fmaxnum_d,
 };
 TRANS_FEAT(FMAXNM_n1, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_n1_fpst, a, f_vector_fmaxnm)
+TRANS_FEAT(FMAXNM_nn, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_nn_fpst, a, f_vector_fmaxnm)
 
 static gen_helper_gvec_3_ptr * const f_vector_fminnm[4] = {
     gen_helper_gvec_fminnum_b16,
@@ -626,3 +690,4 @@ static gen_helper_gvec_3_ptr * const f_vector_fminnm[4] = {
     gen_helper_gvec_fminnum_d,
 };
 TRANS_FEAT(FMINNM_n1, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_n1_fpst, a, f_vector_fminnm)
+TRANS_FEAT(FMINNM_nn, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_nn_fpst, a, f_vector_fminnm)
diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/sme.decode b/target/arm/tcg/sme.decode
index 005f87777b..470592f4c0 100644
--- a/target/arm/tcg/sme.decode
+++ b/target/arm/tcg/sme.decode
@@ -209,3 +209,39 @@ ADD_n1         1100000 1 .. 10 .... 1010.0 11000 .... 0    @z2z_4x1
 
 SQDMULH_n1     1100000 1 .. 10 .... 1010.1 00000 .... 0    @z2z_2x1
 SQDMULH_n1     1100000 1 .. 10 .... 1010.1 00000 .... 0    @z2z_4x1
+
+### SME2 Multi-vector Multiple Vectors SVE Destructive
+
+%zm_ax2         17:4 !function=times_2
+%zm_ax4         18:3 !function=times_4
+
+@z2z_2x2        ....... . esz:2 . ....0 ....0. ..... .... . \
+                &z2z_en n=2 zdn=%zd_ax2 zm=%zm_ax2
+@z2z_4x4        ....... . esz:2 . ...00 ....1. ..... ...0 . \
+                &z2z_en n=4 zdn=%zd_ax4 zm=%zm_ax4
+
+SMAX_nn        1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.0 00000 .... 0    @z2z_2x2
+SMAX_nn        1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.0 00000 .... 0    @z2z_4x4
+UMAX_nn        1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.0 00000 .... 1    @z2z_2x2
+UMAX_nn        1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.0 00000 .... 1    @z2z_4x4
+SMIN_nn        1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.0 00001 .... 0    @z2z_2x2
+SMIN_nn        1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.0 00001 .... 0    @z2z_4x4
+UMIN_nn        1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.0 00001 .... 1    @z2z_2x2
+UMIN_nn        1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.0 00001 .... 1    @z2z_4x4
+
+FMAX_nn        1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.0 01000 .... 0    @z2z_2x2
+FMAX_nn        1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.0 01000 .... 0    @z2z_4x4
+FMIN_nn        1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.0 01000 .... 1    @z2z_2x2
+FMIN_nn        1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.0 01000 .... 1    @z2z_4x4
+FMAXNM_nn      1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.0 01001 .... 0    @z2z_2x2
+FMAXNM_nn      1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.0 01001 .... 0    @z2z_4x4
+FMINNM_nn      1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.0 01001 .... 1    @z2z_2x2
+FMINNM_nn      1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.0 01001 .... 1    @z2z_4x4
+
+SRSHL_nn       1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.0 10001 .... 0    @z2z_2x2
+SRSHL_nn       1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.0 10001 .... 0    @z2z_4x4
+URSHL_nn       1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.0 10001 .... 1    @z2z_2x2
+URSHL_nn       1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.0 10001 .... 1    @z2z_4x4
+
+SQDMULH_nn     1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.1 00000 .... 0    @z2z_2x2
+SQDMULH_nn     1100000 1 .. 1 ..... 1011.1 00000 .... 0    @z2z_4x4
-- 
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH v2 030/101] target/arm: Implement SME2 Multiple Vectors SVE Destructive
Posted by Peter Maydell 4 months, 3 weeks ago
On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 at 00:58, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
>  target/arm/tcg/translate-sme.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  target/arm/tcg/sme.decode      | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 101 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

thanks
-- PMM
Re: [PATCH v2 030/101] target/arm: Implement SME2 Multiple Vectors SVE Destructive
Posted by Peter Maydell 4 months, 3 weeks ago
On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 at 00:58, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
>  target/arm/tcg/translate-sme.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  target/arm/tcg/sme.decode      | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 101 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/translate-sme.c b/target/arm/tcg/translate-sme.c
> index 0e05153924..617621d663 100644
> --- a/target/arm/tcg/translate-sme.c
> +++ b/target/arm/tcg/translate-sme.c
> @@ -550,6 +550,37 @@ TRANS_FEAT(SRSHL_n1, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_n1, a, gen_gvec_srshl)
>  TRANS_FEAT(URSHL_n1, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_n1, a, gen_gvec_urshl)
>  TRANS_FEAT(SQDMULH_n1, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_n1, a, gen_gvec_sve2_sqdmulh)
>
> +static bool do_z2z_nn(DisasContext *s, arg_z2z_en *a, GVecGen3Fn *fn)
> +{
> +    int esz, dn, dm, vsz, n;
> +
> +    if (!sme_sm_enabled_check(s)) {
> +        return true;
> +    }
> +
> +    esz = a->esz;
> +    n = a->n;
> +    dn = a->zdn;
> +    dm = a->zm;
> +    vsz = streaming_vec_reg_size(s);
> +
> +    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> +        int dofs = vec_full_reg_offset(s, dn + i);
> +        int mofs = vec_full_reg_offset(s, dm + i);
> +
> +        fn(esz, dofs, dofs, mofs, vsz, vsz);
> +    }
> +    return true;
> +}

Don't we need to handle Dn and Dm overlapping here, the way
we did in the previous patch ?

-- PMM
Re: [PATCH v2 030/101] target/arm: Implement SME2 Multiple Vectors SVE Destructive
Posted by Richard Henderson 4 months, 3 weeks ago
On 6/23/25 08:25, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 at 00:58, Richard Henderson
> <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   target/arm/tcg/translate-sme.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   target/arm/tcg/sme.decode      | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 101 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/translate-sme.c b/target/arm/tcg/translate-sme.c
>> index 0e05153924..617621d663 100644
>> --- a/target/arm/tcg/translate-sme.c
>> +++ b/target/arm/tcg/translate-sme.c
>> @@ -550,6 +550,37 @@ TRANS_FEAT(SRSHL_n1, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_n1, a, gen_gvec_srshl)
>>   TRANS_FEAT(URSHL_n1, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_n1, a, gen_gvec_urshl)
>>   TRANS_FEAT(SQDMULH_n1, aa64_sme2, do_z2z_n1, a, gen_gvec_sve2_sqdmulh)
>>
>> +static bool do_z2z_nn(DisasContext *s, arg_z2z_en *a, GVecGen3Fn *fn)
>> +{
>> +    int esz, dn, dm, vsz, n;
>> +
>> +    if (!sme_sm_enabled_check(s)) {
>> +        return true;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    esz = a->esz;
>> +    n = a->n;
>> +    dn = a->zdn;
>> +    dm = a->zm;
>> +    vsz = streaming_vec_reg_size(s);
>> +
>> +    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
>> +        int dofs = vec_full_reg_offset(s, dn + i);
>> +        int mofs = vec_full_reg_offset(s, dm + i);
>> +
>> +        fn(esz, dofs, dofs, mofs, vsz, vsz);
>> +    }
>> +    return true;
>> +}
> 
> Don't we need to handle Dn and Dm overlapping here, the way
> we did in the previous patch ?

No, because Zdn and Zm are both aligned, and both incremented.
Zm+i is fully consumed as Zdn+i is written.


r~
> 
> -- PMM