cosmetics for the i6300esb watchdog

[PATCH 0/2] cosmetics for the i6300esb watchdog

Cornelia Huck posted 2 patches 5 months, 1 week ago

Download series mbox

Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/20250610143259.1056400-1-cohuck@redhat.com

Maintainers: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>

hw/watchdog/Kconfig        | 2 +-
hw/watchdog/meson.build    | 2 +-
hw/watchdog/wdt_i6300esb.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Expand all Fold all

[PATCH 0/2] cosmetics for the i6300esb watchdog

Posted by Cornelia Huck 5 months, 1 week ago

The i6300esb watchdog device is generic enough to be used on any PCI
platform; however, having an "Intel" device on a non-x86 platform looks
a bit odd. Just call it a "virtual" device instead, and also fix an old
typo for the config option while at it.

Cornelia Huck (2):
  watchdog: CONFIG_WDT_IB6300ESB -> CONFIG_WDT_I6300ESB
  watchdog: generic name for i6300esb

 hw/watchdog/Kconfig        | 2 +-
 hw/watchdog/meson.build    | 2 +-
 hw/watchdog/wdt_i6300esb.c | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
2.49.0

Re: [PATCH 0/2] cosmetics for the i6300esb watchdog

Posted by Cornelia Huck 4 months, 3 weeks ago

On Tue, Jun 10 2025, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:

> The i6300esb watchdog device is generic enough to be used on any PCI
> platform; however, having an "Intel" device on a non-x86 platform looks
> a bit odd. Just call it a "virtual" device instead, and also fix an old
> typo for the config option while at it.
>
> Cornelia Huck (2):
>   watchdog: CONFIG_WDT_IB6300ESB -> CONFIG_WDT_I6300ESB
>   watchdog: generic name for i6300esb
>
>  hw/watchdog/Kconfig        | 2 +-
>  hw/watchdog/meson.build    | 2 +-
>  hw/watchdog/wdt_i6300esb.c | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Friendly ping -- any sentiment regarding those patches?