tests/qemu-iotests/common.rc | 2 ++ tests/qemu-iotests/tests/mirror-sparse | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Fiona reported that an ext4 filesystem on top of LVM can sometimes
report over-allocation to du (based on the hueristics the filesystem
is making while observing the contents being mirrored); even though
the contents and actual size matched, about 50% of the time the size
reported by disk_usage was too large by 4k, failing the test.
Similarly, on ZFS where a file is created with preallocation=full, du
does not see the full allocation until things have had time to settle;
adding a sync call reduces the chance of catching that async window:
| [I] febner@enia ~/qemu/build/tests/qemu-iotests (master)> qemu-img create my.raw 20M -f
|w -o preallocation=full
| Formatting 'my.raw', fmt=raw size=20971520 preallocation=full
| [I] febner@enia ~/qemu/build/tests/qemu-iotests (master)> du --block-size=1 my.raw
| 512 my.raw
| [I] febner@enia ~/qemu/build/tests/qemu-iotests (master)> du --block-size=1 my.raw
| 20980224 my.raw
Fiona also reported that on a compressed ZFS, the filesystem can end
up reporting smaller disk_usage if it re-compresses a file, despite a
fully-allocating mirror - but since I don't have a compressed ZFS
handy for reproducing that test, that may remain a sporadic problem
for another day.
Reported-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Fixes: c0ddcb2c ("tests: Add iotest mirror-sparse for recent patches")
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
---
tests/qemu-iotests/common.rc | 2 ++
tests/qemu-iotests/tests/mirror-sparse | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/common.rc b/tests/qemu-iotests/common.rc
index 237f746af88..c3fc0bcf02a 100644
--- a/tests/qemu-iotests/common.rc
+++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/common.rc
@@ -143,6 +143,8 @@ _optstr_add()
# report real disk usage for sparse files
disk_usage()
{
+ # ZFS has lazy allocation; sync the file first for best results
+ sync "$1"
du --block-size=1 "$1" | awk '{print $1}'
}
diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/tests/mirror-sparse b/tests/qemu-iotests/tests/mirror-sparse
index 8c52a4e2448..338d6cfbb35 100755
--- a/tests/qemu-iotests/tests/mirror-sparse
+++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/tests/mirror-sparse
@@ -96,10 +96,12 @@ _send_qemu_cmd $h1 '{"execute": "blockdev-del", "arguments":
{"node-name": "dst"}}' 'return' \
| _filter_block_job_offset | _filter_block_job_len
$QEMU_IMG compare -U -f $IMGFMT -F raw $TEST_IMG.base $TEST_IMG
+# Some filesystems can fudge allocations for various reasons; rather
+# than expecting precise 2M and 20M images, it is better to allow for slop.
result=$(disk_usage $TEST_IMG)
if test $result -lt $((3*1024*1024)); then
actual=sparse
-elif test $result = $((20*1024*1024)); then
+elif test $result -gt $((19*1024*1024)); then
actual=full
else
actual=unknown
--
2.49.0
Am 22.05.25 um 23:14 schrieb Eric Blake: > Fiona reported that an ext4 filesystem on top of LVM can sometimes > report over-allocation to du (based on the hueristics the filesystem Typo: heuristics > is making while observing the contents being mirrored); even though > the contents and actual size matched, about 50% of the time the size > reported by disk_usage was too large by 4k, failing the test. > > Similarly, on ZFS where a file is created with preallocation=full, du > does not see the full allocation until things have had time to settle; > adding a sync call reduces the chance of catching that async window: > > | [I] febner@enia ~/qemu/build/tests/qemu-iotests (master)> qemu-img create my.raw 20M -f > |w -o preallocation=full > | Formatting 'my.raw', fmt=raw size=20971520 preallocation=full > | [I] febner@enia ~/qemu/build/tests/qemu-iotests (master)> du --block-size=1 my.raw > | 512 my.raw > | [I] febner@enia ~/qemu/build/tests/qemu-iotests (master)> du --block-size=1 my.raw > | 20980224 my.raw > > Fiona also reported that on a compressed ZFS, the filesystem can end > up reporting smaller disk_usage if it re-compresses a file, despite a > fully-allocating mirror - but since I don't have a compressed ZFS > handy for reproducing that test, that may remain a sporadic problem > for another day. > > Reported-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> > Fixes: c0ddcb2c ("tests: Add iotest mirror-sparse for recent patches") > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> If you drop the hunk with the sync: Reviewed-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> Tested-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> > --- > tests/qemu-iotests/common.rc | 2 ++ > tests/qemu-iotests/tests/mirror-sparse | 4 +++- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/common.rc b/tests/qemu-iotests/common.rc > index 237f746af88..c3fc0bcf02a 100644 > --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/common.rc > +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/common.rc > @@ -143,6 +143,8 @@ _optstr_add() > # report real disk usage for sparse files > disk_usage() > { > + # ZFS has lazy allocation; sync the file first for best results > + sync "$1" Unfortunately, just syncing the file seems to be not enough. It seems to be necessary to sync the whole filesystem, but that of course is too expensive for the helper here: [I] febner@enia ~> rm my.raw; qemu-img create my.raw 20M -f raw -o preallocation=full; sync my.raw; du --block-size=1 my.raw Formatting 'my.raw', fmt=raw size=20971520 preallocation=full 512 my.raw [I] febner@enia ~> rm my.raw; qemu-img create my.raw 20M -f raw -o preallocation=full; sync -f my.raw; du --block-size=1 my.raw Formatting 'my.raw', fmt=raw size=20971520 preallocation=full 20980224 my.raw There's already quite a few other test failures on ZFS, so I guess it's not worth it right now if there's no easy fix (mirror-sparse also still fails, because the file is sparse again after mirroring, ZFS seems very aggressive trying to reduce allocation): For -raw: Failures: 106 109 150 175 221 240 253 308 mirror-sparse write-zeroes-unmap Failed 10 of 86 iotests > du --block-size=1 "$1" | awk '{print $1}' > } > Best Regards, Fiona
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.