If we remove the legacy parser, this formulation begins to fail because
the body text is appended directly after the field list entry, which is
invalid rST syntax.

Markus: suggest where the new Exception(s) should go, if anywhere, and
how to update the tests? I'm assuming deeply you'll want to.

Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
---
 tests/qapi-schema/doc-good.json | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/qapi-schema/doc-good.json b/tests/qapi-schema/doc-good.json
index 14b808f9090..6dcde8fd7e8 100644
--- a/tests/qapi-schema/doc-good.json
+++ b/tests/qapi-schema/doc-good.json
@@ -165,7 +165,8 @@
 #
 # Returns: @Object
 #
-# Errors: some
+# Errors:
+#     - some
 #
 # TODO: frobnicate
 #
-- 
2.48.1

John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> writes:

> If we remove the legacy parser, this formulation begins to fail because
> the body text is appended directly after the field list entry, which is
> invalid rST syntax.
>
> Markus: suggest where the new Exception(s) should go, if anywhere, and
> how to update the tests? I'm assuming deeply you'll want to.

I'm confused and out of time for the week.  Can you give me a bit more
context?

> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
> ---
>  tests/qapi-schema/doc-good.json | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/qapi-schema/doc-good.json b/tests/qapi-schema/doc-good.json
> index 14b808f9090..6dcde8fd7e8 100644
> --- a/tests/qapi-schema/doc-good.json
> +++ b/tests/qapi-schema/doc-good.json
> @@ -165,7 +165,8 @@
>  #
>  # Returns: @Object
>  #
> -# Errors: some
> +# Errors:
> +#     - some
>  #
>  # TODO: frobnicate
>  #