Commit c1f46999ef506 ("amd_iommu: Add support for pass though mode")
introduces the support for "pt" flag by enabling nodma memory when
"pt=off". This allowed VFIO devices to successfully register notifiers
by using nodma region.
But, This also broke things when guest is booted with the iommu=nopt
because, devices bypass the IOMMU and use untranslated addresses (IOVA) to
perform DMA reads/writes to the nodma memory region, ultimately resulting in
a failure to setup the devices in the guest.
Fix the above issue by always enabling the amdvi_dev_as->iommu memory region.
But this will once again cause VFIO devices to fail while registering the
notifiers with AMD IOMMU memory region.
Fixes: c1f46999ef506 ("amd_iommu: Add support for pass though mode")
Signed-off-by: Sairaj Kodilkar <sarunkod@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
---
hw/i386/amd_iommu.c | 12 ++----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
index 5f9b95279997..df8ba5d39ada 100644
--- a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
+++ b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
@@ -1426,7 +1426,6 @@ static AddressSpace *amdvi_host_dma_iommu(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque, int devfn)
AMDVIState *s = opaque;
AMDVIAddressSpace **iommu_as, *amdvi_dev_as;
int bus_num = pci_bus_num(bus);
- X86IOMMUState *x86_iommu = X86_IOMMU_DEVICE(s);
iommu_as = s->address_spaces[bus_num];
@@ -1486,15 +1485,8 @@ static AddressSpace *amdvi_host_dma_iommu(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque, int devfn)
AMDVI_INT_ADDR_FIRST,
&amdvi_dev_as->iommu_ir, 1);
- if (!x86_iommu->pt_supported) {
- memory_region_set_enabled(&amdvi_dev_as->iommu_nodma, false);
- memory_region_set_enabled(MEMORY_REGION(&amdvi_dev_as->iommu),
- true);
- } else {
- memory_region_set_enabled(MEMORY_REGION(&amdvi_dev_as->iommu),
- false);
- memory_region_set_enabled(&amdvi_dev_as->iommu_nodma, true);
- }
+ memory_region_set_enabled(&amdvi_dev_as->iommu_nodma, false);
+ memory_region_set_enabled(MEMORY_REGION(&amdvi_dev_as->iommu), true);
}
return &iommu_as[devfn]->as;
}
--
2.34.1
On 16/5/25 12:05, Sairaj Kodilkar wrote:
> Commit c1f46999ef506 ("amd_iommu: Add support for pass though mode")
> introduces the support for "pt" flag by enabling nodma memory when
> "pt=off". This allowed VFIO devices to successfully register notifiers
> by using nodma region.
>
> But, This also broke things when guest is booted with the iommu=nopt
> because, devices bypass the IOMMU and use untranslated addresses (IOVA) to
> perform DMA reads/writes to the nodma memory region, ultimately resulting in
> a failure to setup the devices in the guest.
>
> Fix the above issue by always enabling the amdvi_dev_as->iommu memory region.
> But this will once again cause VFIO devices to fail while registering the
> notifiers with AMD IOMMU memory region.
>
> Fixes: c1f46999ef506 ("amd_iommu: Add support for pass though mode")
> Signed-off-by: Sairaj Kodilkar <sarunkod@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
> ---
> hw/i386/amd_iommu.c | 12 ++----------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
> index 5f9b95279997..df8ba5d39ada 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
> @@ -1426,7 +1426,6 @@ static AddressSpace *amdvi_host_dma_iommu(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque, int devfn)
> AMDVIState *s = opaque;
> AMDVIAddressSpace **iommu_as, *amdvi_dev_as;
> int bus_num = pci_bus_num(bus);
> - X86IOMMUState *x86_iommu = X86_IOMMU_DEVICE(s);
>
> iommu_as = s->address_spaces[bus_num];
>
> @@ -1486,15 +1485,8 @@ static AddressSpace *amdvi_host_dma_iommu(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque, int devfn)
> AMDVI_INT_ADDR_FIRST,
> &amdvi_dev_as->iommu_ir, 1);
>
> - if (!x86_iommu->pt_supported) {
> - memory_region_set_enabled(&amdvi_dev_as->iommu_nodma, false);
> - memory_region_set_enabled(MEMORY_REGION(&amdvi_dev_as->iommu),
> - true);
> - } else {
> - memory_region_set_enabled(MEMORY_REGION(&amdvi_dev_as->iommu),
> - false);
> - memory_region_set_enabled(&amdvi_dev_as->iommu_nodma, true);
> - }
> + memory_region_set_enabled(&amdvi_dev_as->iommu_nodma, false);
I have no clue about this device but wonder what is the usefulness of
iommu_nodma now, isn't it dead code?
> + memory_region_set_enabled(MEMORY_REGION(&amdvi_dev_as->iommu), true);
> }
> return &iommu_as[devfn]->as;
> }
On 5/16/2025 8:13 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 16/5/25 12:05, Sairaj Kodilkar wrote:
>> Commit c1f46999ef506 ("amd_iommu: Add support for pass though mode")
>> introduces the support for "pt" flag by enabling nodma memory when
>> "pt=off". This allowed VFIO devices to successfully register notifiers
>> by using nodma region.
>>
>> But, This also broke things when guest is booted with the iommu=nopt
>> because, devices bypass the IOMMU and use untranslated addresses
>> (IOVA) to
>> perform DMA reads/writes to the nodma memory region, ultimately
>> resulting in
>> a failure to setup the devices in the guest.
>>
>> Fix the above issue by always enabling the amdvi_dev_as->iommu memory
>> region.
>> But this will once again cause VFIO devices to fail while registering the
>> notifiers with AMD IOMMU memory region.
>>
>> Fixes: c1f46999ef506 ("amd_iommu: Add support for pass though mode")
>> Signed-off-by: Sairaj Kodilkar <sarunkod@amd.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
>> ---
>> hw/i386/amd_iommu.c | 12 ++----------
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
>> index 5f9b95279997..df8ba5d39ada 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
>> +++ b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
>> @@ -1426,7 +1426,6 @@ static AddressSpace *amdvi_host_dma_iommu(PCIBus
>> *bus, void *opaque, int devfn)
>> AMDVIState *s = opaque;
>> AMDVIAddressSpace **iommu_as, *amdvi_dev_as;
>> int bus_num = pci_bus_num(bus);
>> - X86IOMMUState *x86_iommu = X86_IOMMU_DEVICE(s);
>> iommu_as = s->address_spaces[bus_num];
>> @@ -1486,15 +1485,8 @@ static AddressSpace
>> *amdvi_host_dma_iommu(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque, int devfn)
>> AMDVI_INT_ADDR_FIRST,
>> &amdvi_dev_as->iommu_ir,
>> 1);
>> - if (!x86_iommu->pt_supported) {
>> - memory_region_set_enabled(&amdvi_dev_as->iommu_nodma,
>> false);
>> - memory_region_set_enabled(MEMORY_REGION(&amdvi_dev_as-
>> >iommu),
>> - true);
>> - } else {
>> - memory_region_set_enabled(MEMORY_REGION(&amdvi_dev_as-
>> >iommu),
>> - false);
>> - memory_region_set_enabled(&amdvi_dev_as->iommu_nodma, true);
>> - }
>> + memory_region_set_enabled(&amdvi_dev_as->iommu_nodma, false);
>
> I have no clue about this device but wonder what is the usefulness of
> iommu_nodma now, isn't it dead code?
>
Hi Philippe,
Indeed the iommu_nodma is dead. The reason I did not remove the
iommu_nodma region completely is that, Alejandro's DMA remapping patches
[1] uses this region to dynamically switch the address space.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20250502021605.1795985-1-alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com/
Thanks
Sairaj
>> + memory_region_set_enabled(MEMORY_REGION(&amdvi_dev_as-
>> >iommu), true);
>> }
>> return &iommu_as[devfn]->as;
>> }
>
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.