On 4/24/25 13:13, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 24/4/25 12:14, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>> On 24/04/2025 10:46, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>
>>> "accel/tcg/getpc.h" is pulled in indirectly. Include it
>>> explicitly to avoid when refactoring unrelated headers:
>>>
>>> target/riscv/csr.c:2117:25: error: call to undeclared function 'GETPC' [-Wimplicit-
>>> function-declaration]
>>> 2117 | if ((val & RVC) && (GETPC() & ~3) != 0) {
>>> | ^
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> target/riscv/csr.c | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/csr.c b/target/riscv/csr.c
>>> index c52c87faaea..13086438552 100644
>>> --- a/target/riscv/csr.c
>>> +++ b/target/riscv/csr.c
>>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>>> #include "exec/cputlb.h"
>>> #include "exec/tb-flush.h"
>>> #include "exec/icount.h"
>>> +#include "accel/tcg/getpc.h"
>>> #include "qemu/guest-random.h"
>>> #include "qapi/error.h"
>>> #include <stdbool.h>
>>
>> I'm mildly curious as to why the target needs to include accel/tcg/ getpc.h directly as
>> it's almost a requirement for TCG
>
> Indeed. There is a TODO around, added upon introduction in
> commit f18637cd611 ("RISC-V: Add misa runtime write support"):
>
> 2113 /*
> 2114 * Suppress 'C' if next instruction is not aligned
> 2115 * TODO: this should check next_pc
> 2116 */
> 2117 if ((val & RVC) && (GETPC() & ~3) != 0) {
> 2118 val &= ~RVC;
> 2119 }
Yes, I've sent mail about this bug at least twice.
r~