From: Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com>
We have to make sure the array of bytes read from the path= file
is null-terminated, otherwise we run into a buffer overrun later on.
Fixes: bb99f4772f54017490e3356ecbb3df25c5d4537f ("hw/smbios: support loading OEM strings values from a file")
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2879
Signed-off-by: Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Valentin David <valentin.david@canonical.com>
Message-ID: <20250323213622.2581013-1-daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
---
hw/smbios/smbios.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/smbios/smbios.c b/hw/smbios/smbios.c
index 02a09eb9cd0..ad4cd6721e6 100644
--- a/hw/smbios/smbios.c
+++ b/hw/smbios/smbios.c
@@ -1285,6 +1285,9 @@ static int save_opt_one(void *opaque,
g_byte_array_append(data, (guint8 *)buf, ret);
}
+ buf[0] = '\0';
+ g_byte_array_append(data, (guint8 *)buf, 1);
+
qemu_close(fd);
*opt->dest = g_renew(char *, *opt->dest, (*opt->ndest) + 1);
--
2.47.1
CC-ing qemu-stable again to hopefully get this backported to the
stable branches.
Cheers,
Daan
On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 at 20:55, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> From: Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com>
>
> We have to make sure the array of bytes read from the path= file
> is null-terminated, otherwise we run into a buffer overrun later on.
>
> Fixes: bb99f4772f54017490e3356ecbb3df25c5d4537f ("hw/smbios: support loading OEM strings values from a file")
> Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2879
>
> Signed-off-by: Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Valentin David <valentin.david@canonical.com>
> Message-ID: <20250323213622.2581013-1-daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> ---
> hw/smbios/smbios.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/smbios/smbios.c b/hw/smbios/smbios.c
> index 02a09eb9cd0..ad4cd6721e6 100644
> --- a/hw/smbios/smbios.c
> +++ b/hw/smbios/smbios.c
> @@ -1285,6 +1285,9 @@ static int save_opt_one(void *opaque,
> g_byte_array_append(data, (guint8 *)buf, ret);
> }
>
> + buf[0] = '\0';
> + g_byte_array_append(data, (guint8 *)buf, 1);
> +
> qemu_close(fd);
>
> *opt->dest = g_renew(char *, *opt->dest, (*opt->ndest) + 1);
> --
> 2.47.1
>
Hi Daan,
On 17/4/25 12:11, Daan De Meyer wrote:
> CC-ing qemu-stable again to hopefully get this backported to the
> stable branches.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Daan
>
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 at 20:55, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> From: Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com>
>>
>> We have to make sure the array of bytes read from the path= file
>> is null-terminated, otherwise we run into a buffer overrun later on.
>>
>> Fixes: bb99f4772f54017490e3356ecbb3df25c5d4537f ("hw/smbios: support loading OEM strings values from a file")
>> Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2879
>>
If you want to be sure a commit is noticed for backport, you
should add
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
in your commit description.
Regards,
Phil.
>> Signed-off-by: Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
>> Tested-by: Valentin David <valentin.david@canonical.com>
>> Message-ID: <20250323213622.2581013-1-daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> hw/smbios/smbios.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/smbios/smbios.c b/hw/smbios/smbios.c
>> index 02a09eb9cd0..ad4cd6721e6 100644
>> --- a/hw/smbios/smbios.c
>> +++ b/hw/smbios/smbios.c
>> @@ -1285,6 +1285,9 @@ static int save_opt_one(void *opaque,
>> g_byte_array_append(data, (guint8 *)buf, ret);
>> }
>>
>> + buf[0] = '\0';
>> + g_byte_array_append(data, (guint8 *)buf, 1);
>> +
>> qemu_close(fd);
>>
>> *opt->dest = g_renew(char *, *opt->dest, (*opt->ndest) + 1);
>> --
>> 2.47.1
>>
17.04.2025 13:11, Daan De Meyer wrote: > CC-ing qemu-stable again to hopefully get this backported to the > stable branches. Hmm. I picked it up from the first time, see eg https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commits/staging-9.2 (in particular, commit d1960fafecbe1066). I'm curious, why do you think it has to be Cc'ed again? Thanks, /mjt
Apologies, I was unsure whether I should expect a reply on the original mail after the patch had been applied to stable or not. Thanks for the confirmation, Cheers, Daan On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 at 15:05, Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> wrote: > > 17.04.2025 13:11, Daan De Meyer wrote: > > CC-ing qemu-stable again to hopefully get this backported to the > > stable branches. > > Hmm. I picked it up from the first time, see eg > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commits/staging-9.2 > (in particular, commit d1960fafecbe1066). > > I'm curious, why do you think it has to be Cc'ed again? > > Thanks, > > /mjt
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.