[PATCH v4 2/8] hw/ppc: Implement fadump register command

Aditya Gupta posted 8 patches 10 months, 3 weeks ago
Maintainers: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>, Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>, Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>, "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v4 2/8] hw/ppc: Implement fadump register command
Posted by Aditya Gupta 10 months, 3 weeks ago
Implement the register command of "ibm,configure-kernel-dump" RTAS call.
The register just verifies the structure of the fadump memory structure
passed by kernel, and set fadump_registered in spapr state to true.

We also store the passed fadump memory structure, which will later be
used for preserving memory for fadump boot in case of a crash.

The fadump memory structure isn't modified (other than .dump_status_flag
after the fadump is triggered, that is in a later patch).
So if the structure needs to updated, the kernel should first
de-register and re-register the structure again.

Relevant section for the register command in PAPR is:
    Section 7.3.30: "ibm,configure-kernel-dump RTAS call" (PAPR v2.13)

Note: The fadump registration is done, but triggering fadump on an
os-term rtas call is done in later patches. Hence QEMU will just shutdown
on a kernel crash due to no special handling for fadump in ibm,os-term

Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
---
 hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.c         | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c           |   2 +-
 include/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.h |   2 +-
 3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.c
index 20b7b804c485..9c7fb9e12b16 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.c
@@ -5,18 +5,119 @@
  */
 
 #include "qemu/osdep.h"
+#include "qemu/log.h"
 #include "hw/ppc/spapr.h"
 
 /*
  * Handle the "FADUMP_CMD_REGISTER" command in 'ibm,configure-kernel-dump'
  *
+ * Note: Any changes made by the kernel to the fadump memory struct won't
+ * reflect in QEMU after the 'ibm,configure-kernel-dump' RTAS call has returned,
+ * as we store the passed fadump memory structure passed during fadump
+ * registration.
+ * Kernel has to invalidate & re-register fadump, if it intends to make any
+ * changes to the fadump memory structure
+ *
  * Returns:
- *  * RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR: Not implemented/Misc issue such as memory access
- *                       failures
+ *  * RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS: On successful registration
+ *  * RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR: If parameters are not correct, eg. too many
+ *                          sections, invalid memory addresses that we are
+ *                          unable to read, etc
+ *  * RTAS_OUT_DUMP_ALREADY_REGISTERED: Dump already registered
+ *  * RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR: Misc issue such as memory access failures
  */
-uint32_t do_fadump_register(void)
+uint32_t do_fadump_register(SpaprMachineState *spapr, target_ulong args)
 {
-    /* WIP: FADUMP_CMD_REGISTER implemented in future patch */
+    FadumpSectionHeader header;
+    FadumpSection regions[FADUMP_MAX_SECTIONS] = {0};
+    target_ulong fdm_addr = rtas_ld(args, 1);
+    target_ulong fdm_size = rtas_ld(args, 2);
+    AddressSpace *default_as = &address_space_memory;
+    MemTxResult io_result;
+    MemTxAttrs attrs;
+    uint64_t next_section_addr;
+    uint16_t dump_num_sections;
+
+    /* Mark the memory transaction as privileged memory access */
+    attrs.user = 0;
+    attrs.memory = 1;
+
+    if (spapr->fadump_registered) {
+        /* FADump already registered */
+        return RTAS_OUT_DUMP_ALREADY_REGISTERED;
+    }
+
+    if (spapr->fadump_dump_active == 1) {
+        return RTAS_OUT_DUMP_ACTIVE;
+    }
+
+    if (fdm_size < sizeof(FadumpSectionHeader)) {
+        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
+            "FADump: Header size is invalid: %lu\n", fdm_size);
+        return RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR;
+    }
+
+    /* Ensure fdm_addr points to a valid RMR-memory/RMA-memory buffer */
+    if ((fdm_addr <= 0) || ((fdm_addr + fdm_size) > spapr->rma_size)) {
+        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
+            "FADump: Invalid fdm address: %ld\n", fdm_addr);
+        return RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR;
+    }
+
+    /* Try to read the passed fadump header */
+    io_result = address_space_read(default_as, fdm_addr, attrs,
+            &header, sizeof(header));
+    if (io_result != MEMTX_OK) {
+        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
+            "FADump: Unable to read fdm address: %ld\n", fdm_addr);
+
+        return RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR;
+    }
+
+    /* Verify that we understand the fadump header version */
+    if (header.dump_format_version != cpu_to_be32(FADUMP_VERSION)) {
+        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
+            "FADump: Unknown fadump header version: 0x%x\n",
+            header.dump_format_version);
+        return RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR;
+    }
+
+    /* Reset dump status flags */
+    header.dump_status_flag = 0;
+
+    dump_num_sections = be16_to_cpu(header.dump_num_sections);
+
+    if (dump_num_sections > FADUMP_MAX_SECTIONS) {
+        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
+            "FADump: Too many sections: %d sections\n", dump_num_sections);
+        return RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR;
+    }
+
+    next_section_addr =
+        fdm_addr +
+        be32_to_cpu(header.offset_first_dump_section);
+
+    for (int i = 0; i < dump_num_sections; ++i) {
+        /* Read the fadump section from memory */
+        io_result = address_space_read(default_as, next_section_addr, attrs,
+                &regions[i], sizeof(regions[i]));
+        if (io_result != MEMTX_OK) {
+            qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,
+                "FADump: Unable to read fadump %dth section\n", i);
+            return RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR;
+        }
+
+        next_section_addr += sizeof(regions[i]);
+    }
+
+    spapr->fadump_registered = true;
+    spapr->fadump_dump_active = false;
+
+    /* Store the registered fadump memory struct */
+    spapr->registered_fdm.header = header;
+    for (int i = 0; i < dump_num_sections; ++i) {
+        spapr->registered_fdm.rgn[i] = regions[i];
+    }
 
-    return RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR;
+    return RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS;
 }
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
index b8bfa9c33fb5..0454938a01e9 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ static void rtas_configure_kernel_dump(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
 
     switch (cmd) {
     case FADUMP_CMD_REGISTER:
-        ret_val = do_fadump_register();
+        ret_val = do_fadump_register(spapr, args);
         if (ret_val != RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS) {
             rtas_st(rets, 0, ret_val);
             return;
diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.h
index 45109fd9e137..6abbcb44f353 100644
--- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.h
+++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.h
@@ -65,5 +65,5 @@ struct FadumpMemStruct {
     FadumpSection       rgn[FADUMP_MAX_SECTIONS];
 };
 
-uint32_t do_fadump_register(void);
+uint32_t do_fadump_register(struct SpaprMachineState *, target_ulong);
 #endif /* PPC_SPAPR_FADUMP_H */
-- 
2.49.0
Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] hw/ppc: Implement fadump register command
Posted by Sourabh Jain 3 months, 3 weeks ago

On 23/03/25 23:10, Aditya Gupta wrote:
> Implement the register command of "ibm,configure-kernel-dump" RTAS call.
> The register just verifies the structure of the fadump memory structure
> passed by kernel, and set fadump_registered in spapr state to true.
>
> We also store the passed fadump memory structure, which will later be
> used for preserving memory for fadump boot in case of a crash.
>
> The fadump memory structure isn't modified (other than .dump_status_flag
> after the fadump is triggered, that is in a later patch).
> So if the structure needs to updated, the kernel should first
> de-register and re-register the structure again.
>
> Relevant section for the register command in PAPR is:
>      Section 7.3.30: "ibm,configure-kernel-dump RTAS call" (PAPR v2.13)
>
> Note: The fadump registration is done, but triggering fadump on an
> os-term rtas call is done in later patches. Hence QEMU will just shutdown
> on a kernel crash due to no special handling for fadump in ibm,os-term
>
> Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.c         | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c           |   2 +-
>   include/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.h |   2 +-
>   3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.c
> index 20b7b804c485..9c7fb9e12b16 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.c
> @@ -5,18 +5,119 @@
>    */
>   
>   #include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include "qemu/log.h"
>   #include "hw/ppc/spapr.h"
>   
>   /*
>    * Handle the "FADUMP_CMD_REGISTER" command in 'ibm,configure-kernel-dump'
>    *
> + * Note: Any changes made by the kernel to the fadump memory struct won't
> + * reflect in QEMU after the 'ibm,configure-kernel-dump' RTAS call has returned,
> + * as we store the passed fadump memory structure passed during fadump
passed fadump memory structure passed... is not easy to understand; how 
about?

Note: Any modifications made by the kernel to the fadump memory structure
after the 'ibm,configure-kernel-dump' RTAS call returns will not be 
reflected
in QEMU as QEMU retains the fadump memory structure that was provided
during fadump registration.

The kernel must invalidate and re-register fadump to apply any changes
to the fadump memory structure.

> + * registration.
> + * Kernel has to invalidate & re-register fadump, if it intends to make any
> + * changes to the fadump memory structure
> + *
>    * Returns:
> - *  * RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR: Not implemented/Misc issue such as memory access
> - *                       failures
> + *  * RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS: On successful registration
> + *  * RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR: If parameters are not correct, eg. too many
> + *                          sections, invalid memory addresses that we are
> + *                          unable to read, etc
> + *  * RTAS_OUT_DUMP_ALREADY_REGISTERED: Dump already registered
> + *  * RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR: Misc issue such as memory access failures
>    */
> -uint32_t do_fadump_register(void)
> +uint32_t do_fadump_register(SpaprMachineState *spapr, target_ulong args)
>   {
> -    /* WIP: FADUMP_CMD_REGISTER implemented in future patch */
> +    FadumpSectionHeader header;
> +    FadumpSection regions[FADUMP_MAX_SECTIONS] = {0};
> +    target_ulong fdm_addr = rtas_ld(args, 1);
> +    target_ulong fdm_size = rtas_ld(args, 2);
> +    AddressSpace *default_as = &address_space_memory;
> +    MemTxResult io_result;
> +    MemTxAttrs attrs;
> +    uint64_t next_section_addr;
> +    uint16_t dump_num_sections;
> +
> +    /* Mark the memory transaction as privileged memory access */
> +    attrs.user = 0;
> +    attrs.memory = 1;
> +
> +    if (spapr->fadump_registered) {
> +        /* FADump already registered */
> +        return RTAS_OUT_DUMP_ALREADY_REGISTERED;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (spapr->fadump_dump_active == 1) {

fadump_dump_active is bool, so comparing with an integer is not needed.

> +        return RTAS_OUT_DUMP_ACTIVE;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (fdm_size < sizeof(FadumpSectionHeader)) {
> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> +            "FADump: Header size is invalid: %lu\n", fdm_size);
> +        return RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR;
> +    }
> +
> +    /* Ensure fdm_addr points to a valid RMR-memory/RMA-memory buffer */
> +    if ((fdm_addr <= 0) || ((fdm_addr + fdm_size) > spapr->rma_size)) {
> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> +            "FADump: Invalid fdm address: %ld\n", fdm_addr);
> +        return RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR;
> +    }
> +
> +    /* Try to read the passed fadump header */
> +    io_result = address_space_read(default_as, fdm_addr, attrs,
> +            &header, sizeof(header));
> +    if (io_result != MEMTX_OK) {
> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> +            "FADump: Unable to read fdm address: %ld\n", fdm_addr);
> +
> +        return RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR;
> +    }
> +
> +    /* Verify that we understand the fadump header version */
> +    if (header.dump_format_version != cpu_to_be32(FADUMP_VERSION)) {
> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> +            "FADump: Unknown fadump header version: 0x%x\n",
> +            header.dump_format_version);
> +        return RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR;
> +    }
> +
> +    /* Reset dump status flags */
> +    header.dump_status_flag = 0;
> +
> +    dump_num_sections = be16_to_cpu(header.dump_num_sections);
> +
> +    if (dump_num_sections > FADUMP_MAX_SECTIONS) {
> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> +            "FADump: Too many sections: %d sections\n", dump_num_sections);
> +        return RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR;
> +    }
> +
> +    next_section_addr =
> +        fdm_addr +
> +        be32_to_cpu(header.offset_first_dump_section);
> +
> +    for (int i = 0; i < dump_num_sections; ++i) {
> +        /* Read the fadump section from memory */
> +        io_result = address_space_read(default_as, next_section_addr, attrs,
> +                &regions[i], sizeof(regions[i]));
> +        if (io_result != MEMTX_OK) {
> +            qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,
> +                "FADump: Unable to read fadump %dth section\n", i);
> +            return RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR;
> +        }
> +
> +        next_section_addr += sizeof(regions[i]);
> +    }
> +
> +    spapr->fadump_registered = true;
> +    spapr->fadump_dump_active = false;

Setting fadump_dump_active is not really required. Ideally, we shouldn't 
reach here
if it is set to true, or am I missing something?

> +
> +    /* Store the registered fadump memory struct */
> +    spapr->registered_fdm.header = header;
> +    for (int i = 0; i < dump_num_sections; ++i) {
> +        spapr->registered_fdm.rgn[i] = regions[i];
> +    }
>   
> -    return RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR;
> +    return RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS;
>   }
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
> index b8bfa9c33fb5..0454938a01e9 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
> @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ static void rtas_configure_kernel_dump(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>   
>       switch (cmd) {
>       case FADUMP_CMD_REGISTER:
> -        ret_val = do_fadump_register();
> +        ret_val = do_fadump_register(spapr, args);
>           if (ret_val != RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS) {
>               rtas_st(rets, 0, ret_val);
>               return;
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.h
> index 45109fd9e137..6abbcb44f353 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.h
> @@ -65,5 +65,5 @@ struct FadumpMemStruct {
>       FadumpSection       rgn[FADUMP_MAX_SECTIONS];
>   };
>   
> -uint32_t do_fadump_register(void);
> +uint32_t do_fadump_register(struct SpaprMachineState *, target_ulong);

Seems like the forward declaration of struct SpaprMachineState done in 
01/08 is
because of the above change. Should we do there forward declaration here 
instead?

>   #endif /* PPC_SPAPR_FADUMP_H */
Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] hw/ppc: Implement fadump register command
Posted by Aditya Gupta 3 months, 3 weeks ago
On 25/10/17 03:24PM, Sourabh Jain wrote:
> 
> 
> On 23/03/25 23:10, Aditya Gupta wrote:
> > Implement the register command of "ibm,configure-kernel-dump" RTAS call.
> > The register just verifies the structure of the fadump memory structure
> > passed by kernel, and set fadump_registered in spapr state to true.
> > 
> > We also store the passed fadump memory structure, which will later be
> > used for preserving memory for fadump boot in case of a crash.
> > 
> > The fadump memory structure isn't modified (other than .dump_status_flag
> > after the fadump is triggered, that is in a later patch).
> > So if the structure needs to updated, the kernel should first
> > de-register and re-register the structure again.
> > 
> > Relevant section for the register command in PAPR is:
> >      Section 7.3.30: "ibm,configure-kernel-dump RTAS call" (PAPR v2.13)
> > 
> > Note: The fadump registration is done, but triggering fadump on an
> > os-term rtas call is done in later patches. Hence QEMU will just shutdown
> > on a kernel crash due to no special handling for fadump in ibm,os-term
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >   hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.c         | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >   hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c           |   2 +-
> >   include/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.h |   2 +-
> >   3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.c
> > index 20b7b804c485..9c7fb9e12b16 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.c
> > @@ -5,18 +5,119 @@
> >    */
> >   #include "qemu/osdep.h"
> > +#include "qemu/log.h"
> >   #include "hw/ppc/spapr.h"
> >   /*
> >    * Handle the "FADUMP_CMD_REGISTER" command in 'ibm,configure-kernel-dump'
> >    *
> > + * Note: Any changes made by the kernel to the fadump memory struct won't
> > + * reflect in QEMU after the 'ibm,configure-kernel-dump' RTAS call has returned,
> > + * as we store the passed fadump memory structure passed during fadump
> passed fadump memory structure passed... is not easy to understand; how
> about?
> 
> Note: Any modifications made by the kernel to the fadump memory structure
> after the 'ibm,configure-kernel-dump' RTAS call returns will not be
> reflected
> in QEMU as QEMU retains the fadump memory structure that was provided
> during fadump registration.
> 
> The kernel must invalidate and re-register fadump to apply any changes
> to the fadump memory structure.

Makes sense. Will use the suggested text.

> 
> > + * registration.
> > + * Kernel has to invalidate & re-register fadump, if it intends to make any
> > + * changes to the fadump memory structure
> > + *
> >    * Returns:
> > - *  * RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR: Not implemented/Misc issue such as memory access
> > - *                       failures
> > + *  * RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS: On successful registration
> > + *  * RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR: If parameters are not correct, eg. too many
> > + *                          sections, invalid memory addresses that we are
> > + *                          unable to read, etc
> > + *  * RTAS_OUT_DUMP_ALREADY_REGISTERED: Dump already registered
> > + *  * RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR: Misc issue such as memory access failures
> >    */
> > -uint32_t do_fadump_register(void)
> > +uint32_t do_fadump_register(SpaprMachineState *spapr, target_ulong args)
> >   {
> > -    /* WIP: FADUMP_CMD_REGISTER implemented in future patch */
> > +    FadumpSectionHeader header;
> > +    FadumpSection regions[FADUMP_MAX_SECTIONS] = {0};
> > +    target_ulong fdm_addr = rtas_ld(args, 1);
> > +    target_ulong fdm_size = rtas_ld(args, 2);
> > +    AddressSpace *default_as = &address_space_memory;
> > +    MemTxResult io_result;
> > +    MemTxAttrs attrs;
> > +    uint64_t next_section_addr;
> > +    uint16_t dump_num_sections;
> > +
> > +    /* Mark the memory transaction as privileged memory access */
> > +    attrs.user = 0;
> > +    attrs.memory = 1;
> > +
> > +    if (spapr->fadump_registered) {
> > +        /* FADump already registered */
> > +        return RTAS_OUT_DUMP_ALREADY_REGISTERED;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    if (spapr->fadump_dump_active == 1) {
> 
> fadump_dump_active is bool, so comparing with an integer is not needed.

Will remove == 1.

> 
> > +        return RTAS_OUT_DUMP_ACTIVE;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    if (fdm_size < sizeof(FadumpSectionHeader)) {
> > +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> > +            "FADump: Header size is invalid: %lu\n", fdm_size);
> > +        return RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    /* Ensure fdm_addr points to a valid RMR-memory/RMA-memory buffer */
> > +    if ((fdm_addr <= 0) || ((fdm_addr + fdm_size) > spapr->rma_size)) {
> > +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> > +            "FADump: Invalid fdm address: %ld\n", fdm_addr);
> > +        return RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    /* Try to read the passed fadump header */
> > +    io_result = address_space_read(default_as, fdm_addr, attrs,
> > +            &header, sizeof(header));
> > +    if (io_result != MEMTX_OK) {
> > +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> > +            "FADump: Unable to read fdm address: %ld\n", fdm_addr);
> > +
> > +        return RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    /* Verify that we understand the fadump header version */
> > +    if (header.dump_format_version != cpu_to_be32(FADUMP_VERSION)) {
> > +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> > +            "FADump: Unknown fadump header version: 0x%x\n",
> > +            header.dump_format_version);
> > +        return RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    /* Reset dump status flags */
> > +    header.dump_status_flag = 0;
> > +
> > +    dump_num_sections = be16_to_cpu(header.dump_num_sections);
> > +
> > +    if (dump_num_sections > FADUMP_MAX_SECTIONS) {
> > +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> > +            "FADump: Too many sections: %d sections\n", dump_num_sections);
> > +        return RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    next_section_addr =
> > +        fdm_addr +
> > +        be32_to_cpu(header.offset_first_dump_section);
> > +
> > +    for (int i = 0; i < dump_num_sections; ++i) {
> > +        /* Read the fadump section from memory */
> > +        io_result = address_space_read(default_as, next_section_addr, attrs,
> > +                &regions[i], sizeof(regions[i]));
> > +        if (io_result != MEMTX_OK) {
> > +            qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,
> > +                "FADump: Unable to read fadump %dth section\n", i);
> > +            return RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR;
> > +        }
> > +
> > +        next_section_addr += sizeof(regions[i]);
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    spapr->fadump_registered = true;
> > +    spapr->fadump_dump_active = false;
> 
> Setting fadump_dump_active is not really required. Ideally, we shouldn't
> reach here
> if it is set to true, or am I missing something?

True, with current change it's not really needed. But to be on safe
side, it's better to keep valid values hence ensuring dump_active is
false, after register.

> 
> > +
> > +    /* Store the registered fadump memory struct */
> > +    spapr->registered_fdm.header = header;
> > +    for (int i = 0; i < dump_num_sections; ++i) {
> > +        spapr->registered_fdm.rgn[i] = regions[i];
> > +    }
> > -    return RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR;
> > +    return RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS;
> >   }
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
> > index b8bfa9c33fb5..0454938a01e9 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
> > @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ static void rtas_configure_kernel_dump(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> >       switch (cmd) {
> >       case FADUMP_CMD_REGISTER:
> > -        ret_val = do_fadump_register();
> > +        ret_val = do_fadump_register(spapr, args);
> >           if (ret_val != RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS) {
> >               rtas_st(rets, 0, ret_val);
> >               return;
> > diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.h
> > index 45109fd9e137..6abbcb44f353 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.h
> > @@ -65,5 +65,5 @@ struct FadumpMemStruct {
> >       FadumpSection       rgn[FADUMP_MAX_SECTIONS];
> >   };
> > -uint32_t do_fadump_register(void);
> > +uint32_t do_fadump_register(struct SpaprMachineState *, target_ulong);
> 
> Seems like the forward declaration of struct SpaprMachineState done in 01/08
> is
> because of the above change. Should we do there forward declaration here
> instead?

Yes, it was for this.
Merging patch 1 and 2 in v5, then this will be fine.

Thanks Sourabh !
- Aditya G

> 
> >   #endif /* PPC_SPAPR_FADUMP_H */
>
Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] hw/ppc: Implement fadump register command
Posted by Sourabh Jain 3 months, 3 weeks ago

On 17/10/25 17:25, Aditya Gupta wrote:
> On 25/10/17 03:24PM, Sourabh Jain wrote:
>>
>> On 23/03/25 23:10, Aditya Gupta wrote:
>>> Implement the register command of "ibm,configure-kernel-dump" RTAS call.
>>> The register just verifies the structure of the fadump memory structure
>>> passed by kernel, and set fadump_registered in spapr state to true.
>>>
>>> We also store the passed fadump memory structure, which will later be
>>> used for preserving memory for fadump boot in case of a crash.
>>>
>>> The fadump memory structure isn't modified (other than .dump_status_flag
>>> after the fadump is triggered, that is in a later patch).
>>> So if the structure needs to updated, the kernel should first
>>> de-register and re-register the structure again.
>>>
>>> Relevant section for the register command in PAPR is:
>>>       Section 7.3.30: "ibm,configure-kernel-dump RTAS call" (PAPR v2.13)
>>>
>>> Note: The fadump registration is done, but triggering fadump on an
>>> os-term rtas call is done in later patches. Hence QEMU will just shutdown
>>> on a kernel crash due to no special handling for fadump in ibm,os-term
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>>    hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.c         | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>    hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c           |   2 +-
>>>    include/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.h |   2 +-
>>>    3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.c
>>> index 20b7b804c485..9c7fb9e12b16 100644
>>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.c
>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.c
>>> @@ -5,18 +5,119 @@
>>>     */
>>>    #include "qemu/osdep.h"
>>> +#include "qemu/log.h"
>>>    #include "hw/ppc/spapr.h"
>>>    /*
>>>     * Handle the "FADUMP_CMD_REGISTER" command in 'ibm,configure-kernel-dump'
>>>     *
>>> + * Note: Any changes made by the kernel to the fadump memory struct won't
>>> + * reflect in QEMU after the 'ibm,configure-kernel-dump' RTAS call has returned,
>>> + * as we store the passed fadump memory structure passed during fadump
>> passed fadump memory structure passed... is not easy to understand; how
>> about?
>>
>> Note: Any modifications made by the kernel to the fadump memory structure
>> after the 'ibm,configure-kernel-dump' RTAS call returns will not be
>> reflected
>> in QEMU as QEMU retains the fadump memory structure that was provided
>> during fadump registration.
>>
>> The kernel must invalidate and re-register fadump to apply any changes
>> to the fadump memory structure.
> Makes sense. Will use the suggested text.
>
>>> + * registration.
>>> + * Kernel has to invalidate & re-register fadump, if it intends to make any
>>> + * changes to the fadump memory structure
>>> + *
>>>     * Returns:
>>> - *  * RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR: Not implemented/Misc issue such as memory access
>>> - *                       failures
>>> + *  * RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS: On successful registration
>>> + *  * RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR: If parameters are not correct, eg. too many
>>> + *                          sections, invalid memory addresses that we are
>>> + *                          unable to read, etc
>>> + *  * RTAS_OUT_DUMP_ALREADY_REGISTERED: Dump already registered
>>> + *  * RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR: Misc issue such as memory access failures
>>>     */
>>> -uint32_t do_fadump_register(void)
>>> +uint32_t do_fadump_register(SpaprMachineState *spapr, target_ulong args)
>>>    {
>>> -    /* WIP: FADUMP_CMD_REGISTER implemented in future patch */
>>> +    FadumpSectionHeader header;
>>> +    FadumpSection regions[FADUMP_MAX_SECTIONS] = {0};
>>> +    target_ulong fdm_addr = rtas_ld(args, 1);
>>> +    target_ulong fdm_size = rtas_ld(args, 2);
>>> +    AddressSpace *default_as = &address_space_memory;
>>> +    MemTxResult io_result;
>>> +    MemTxAttrs attrs;
>>> +    uint64_t next_section_addr;
>>> +    uint16_t dump_num_sections;
>>> +
>>> +    /* Mark the memory transaction as privileged memory access */
>>> +    attrs.user = 0;
>>> +    attrs.memory = 1;
>>> +
>>> +    if (spapr->fadump_registered) {
>>> +        /* FADump already registered */
>>> +        return RTAS_OUT_DUMP_ALREADY_REGISTERED;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    if (spapr->fadump_dump_active == 1) {
>> fadump_dump_active is bool, so comparing with an integer is not needed.
> Will remove == 1.
>
>>> +        return RTAS_OUT_DUMP_ACTIVE;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    if (fdm_size < sizeof(FadumpSectionHeader)) {
>>> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
>>> +            "FADump: Header size is invalid: %lu\n", fdm_size);
>>> +        return RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    /* Ensure fdm_addr points to a valid RMR-memory/RMA-memory buffer */
>>> +    if ((fdm_addr <= 0) || ((fdm_addr + fdm_size) > spapr->rma_size)) {
>>> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
>>> +            "FADump: Invalid fdm address: %ld\n", fdm_addr);
>>> +        return RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    /* Try to read the passed fadump header */
>>> +    io_result = address_space_read(default_as, fdm_addr, attrs,
>>> +            &header, sizeof(header));
>>> +    if (io_result != MEMTX_OK) {
>>> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
>>> +            "FADump: Unable to read fdm address: %ld\n", fdm_addr);
>>> +
>>> +        return RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    /* Verify that we understand the fadump header version */
>>> +    if (header.dump_format_version != cpu_to_be32(FADUMP_VERSION)) {
>>> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
>>> +            "FADump: Unknown fadump header version: 0x%x\n",
>>> +            header.dump_format_version);
>>> +        return RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    /* Reset dump status flags */
>>> +    header.dump_status_flag = 0;
>>> +
>>> +    dump_num_sections = be16_to_cpu(header.dump_num_sections);
>>> +
>>> +    if (dump_num_sections > FADUMP_MAX_SECTIONS) {
>>> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
>>> +            "FADump: Too many sections: %d sections\n", dump_num_sections);
>>> +        return RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    next_section_addr =
>>> +        fdm_addr +
>>> +        be32_to_cpu(header.offset_first_dump_section);
>>> +
>>> +    for (int i = 0; i < dump_num_sections; ++i) {
>>> +        /* Read the fadump section from memory */
>>> +        io_result = address_space_read(default_as, next_section_addr, attrs,
>>> +                &regions[i], sizeof(regions[i]));
>>> +        if (io_result != MEMTX_OK) {
>>> +            qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,
>>> +                "FADump: Unable to read fadump %dth section\n", i);
>>> +            return RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR;
>>> +        }
>>> +
>>> +        next_section_addr += sizeof(regions[i]);
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    spapr->fadump_registered = true;
>>> +    spapr->fadump_dump_active = false;
>> Setting fadump_dump_active is not really required. Ideally, we shouldn't
>> reach here
>> if it is set to true, or am I missing something?
> True, with current change it's not really needed. But to be on safe
> side, it's better to keep valid values hence ensuring dump_active is
> false, after register.

Ok.

>
>>> +
>>> +    /* Store the registered fadump memory struct */
>>> +    spapr->registered_fdm.header = header;
>>> +    for (int i = 0; i < dump_num_sections; ++i) {
>>> +        spapr->registered_fdm.rgn[i] = regions[i];
>>> +    }
>>> -    return RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR;
>>> +    return RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS;
>>>    }
>>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
>>> index b8bfa9c33fb5..0454938a01e9 100644
>>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
>>> @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ static void rtas_configure_kernel_dump(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>>>        switch (cmd) {
>>>        case FADUMP_CMD_REGISTER:
>>> -        ret_val = do_fadump_register();
>>> +        ret_val = do_fadump_register(spapr, args);
>>>            if (ret_val != RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS) {
>>>                rtas_st(rets, 0, ret_val);
>>>                return;
>>> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.h
>>> index 45109fd9e137..6abbcb44f353 100644
>>> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.h
>>> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_fadump.h
>>> @@ -65,5 +65,5 @@ struct FadumpMemStruct {
>>>        FadumpSection       rgn[FADUMP_MAX_SECTIONS];
>>>    };
>>> -uint32_t do_fadump_register(void);
>>> +uint32_t do_fadump_register(struct SpaprMachineState *, target_ulong);
>> Seems like the forward declaration of struct SpaprMachineState done in 01/08
>> is
>> because of the above change. Should we do there forward declaration here
>> instead?
> Yes, it was for this.
> Merging patch 1 and 2 in v5, then this will be fine.

Yeah it make sense.

- Sourabh