From: Huang Borong <huangborong@bosc.ac.cn>

Remove the redundant masking of "hart_idx", as the same operation is
performed later during address calculation.

This change impacts the "hart_idx" value in the final qemu_log_mask()
call. The original "hart_idx" parameter should be used for logging to
ensure accuracy, rather than the masked value.

Signed-off-by: Huang Borong <huangborong@bosc.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20250115035105.19600-1-huangborong@bosc.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
---
 hw/intc/riscv_aplic.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/intc/riscv_aplic.c b/hw/intc/riscv_aplic.c
index 4866649115..0974c6a5db 100644
--- a/hw/intc/riscv_aplic.c
+++ b/hw/intc/riscv_aplic.c
@@ -421,7 +421,6 @@ static void riscv_aplic_msi_send(RISCVAPLICState *aplic,
             APLIC_xMSICFGADDRH_HHXW_MASK;
 
     group_idx = hart_idx >> lhxw;
-    hart_idx &= APLIC_xMSICFGADDR_PPN_LHX_MASK(lhxw);
 
     addr = msicfgaddr;
     addr |= ((uint64_t)(msicfgaddrH & APLIC_xMSICFGADDRH_BAPPN_MASK)) << 32;
-- 
2.48.1