[PATCH v2 1/3] docs/cpu-features: Consistently use vCPU instead of VCPU

Kashyap Chamarthy posted 3 patches 1 month, 2 weeks ago
Only 2 patches received!
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v2 1/3] docs/cpu-features: Consistently use vCPU instead of VCPU
Posted by Kashyap Chamarthy 1 month, 2 weeks ago
Signed-off-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
---
 docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst b/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
index 37d5dfd15b..a596316384 100644
--- a/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
+++ b/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ disabled, enables the optional AArch32 CPU feature, is only supported
 when using the KVM accelerator and when running on a host CPU type that
 supports the feature.  While ``aarch64`` currently only works with KVM,
 it could work with TCG.  CPU features that are specific to KVM are
-prefixed with "kvm-" and are described in "KVM VCPU Features".
+prefixed with "kvm-" and are described in "KVM vCPU Features".
 
 CPU Feature Probing
 ===================
@@ -167,22 +167,22 @@ disabling many SVE vector lengths would be quite verbose, the ``sve<N>`` CPU
 properties have special semantics (see "SVE CPU Property Parsing
 Semantics").
 
-KVM VCPU Features
+KVM vCPU Features
 =================
 
-KVM VCPU features are CPU features that are specific to KVM, such as
+KVM vCPU features are CPU features that are specific to KVM, such as
 paravirt features or features that enable CPU virtualization extensions.
 The features' CPU properties are only available when KVM is enabled and
-are named with the prefix "kvm-".  KVM VCPU features may be probed,
+are named with the prefix "kvm-".  KVM vCPU features may be probed,
 enabled, and disabled in the same way as other CPU features.  Below is
-the list of KVM VCPU features and their descriptions.
+the list of KVM vCPU features and their descriptions.
 
 ``kvm-no-adjvtime``
   By default kvm-no-adjvtime is disabled.  This means that by default
   the virtual time adjustment is enabled (vtime is not *not* adjusted).
 
   When virtual time adjustment is enabled each time the VM transitions
-  back to running state the VCPU's virtual counter is updated to
+  back to running state the vCPU's virtual counter is updated to
   ensure stopped time is not counted.  This avoids time jumps
   surprising guest OSes and applications, as long as they use the
   virtual counter for timekeeping.  However it has the side effect of
@@ -200,15 +200,15 @@ the list of KVM VCPU features and their descriptions.
 
   When kvm-steal-time is enabled a 64-bit guest can account for time
   its CPUs were not running due to the host not scheduling the
-  corresponding VCPU threads.  The accounting statistics may influence
+  corresponding vCPU threads.  The accounting statistics may influence
   the guest scheduler behavior and/or be exposed to the guest
   userspace.
 
-TCG VCPU Features
+TCG vCPU Features
 =================
 
-TCG VCPU features are CPU features that are specific to TCG.
-Below is the list of TCG VCPU features and their descriptions.
+TCG vCPU features are CPU features that are specific to TCG.
+Below is the list of TCG vCPU features and their descriptions.
 
 ``pauth``
   Enable or disable ``FEAT_Pauth`` entirely.
-- 
2.48.1
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] docs/cpu-features: Consistently use vCPU instead of VCPU
Posted by Alex Bennée 1 month, 2 weeks ago
Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> writes:

> Signed-off-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>

Should we add vCPU to glossary.rst?

Anyway: Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>

-- 
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] docs/cpu-features: Consistently use vCPU instead of VCPU
Posted by Kashyap Chamarthy 1 month, 2 weeks ago
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 09:09:12PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
> 
> Should we add vCPU to glossary.rst?

Ah, I didn't notice this in the tree.  I can add as a follow-up later.

PS: I sent the patch while on a train, `git publish` was acting up.  My
apologies if duplicate copies of this patch series land on 'qemu-devel'.

> Anyway: Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> 
> -- 
> Alex Bennée
> Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro
> 

-- 
/kashyap