Hi Anton,
I think that the commit message could be improved for better clarity.
The vext_check_ss function affects more RVV instructions than the
vadd.vx instruction alone.
(PS:perhaps using the category (OPIVX/OPFVF/etc.) to describe the
affected RVV instructions would be more helpful.)
Additionally, the patch 04/07/08/09/10 also have the same issue.
Thanks,
Max
On 2025/1/26 3:20 PM, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <antonb@tenstorrent.com>
> ---
> target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
> index c66cd95bdb..bc2780497e 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
> +++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
> @@ -382,6 +382,7 @@ static bool vext_check_ld_index(DisasContext *s, int vd, int vs2,
> static bool vext_check_ss(DisasContext *s, int vd, int vs, int vm)
> {
> return require_vm(vm, vd) &&
> + require_vm(vm, vs) &&
> require_align(vd, s->lmul) &&
> require_align(vs, s->lmul);
> }