Until there are timers enabled the semantics of clock_step_next() will
fail. Since d524441a36 (system/qtest: properly feedback results of
clock_[step|set]) we will signal a FAIL if time doesn't advance.

Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
---
 tests/qtest/npcm7xx_timer-test.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/qtest/npcm7xx_timer-test.c b/tests/qtest/npcm7xx_timer-test.c
index 58f58c2f71..43711049ca 100644
--- a/tests/qtest/npcm7xx_timer-test.c
+++ b/tests/qtest/npcm7xx_timer-test.c
@@ -465,7 +465,6 @@ static void test_periodic_interrupt(gconstpointer test_data)
     int i;
 
     tim_reset(td);
-    clock_step_next();
 
     tim_write_ticr(td, count);
     tim_write_tcsr(td, CEN | IE | MODE_PERIODIC | PRESCALE(ps));
-- 
2.39.5

On 20/01/2025 22.02, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Until there are timers enabled the semantics of clock_step_next() will
> fail. Since d524441a36 (system/qtest: properly feedback results of
> clock_[step|set]) we will signal a FAIL if time doesn't advance.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> ---
>   tests/qtest/npcm7xx_timer-test.c | 1 -
>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/npcm7xx_timer-test.c b/tests/qtest/npcm7xx_timer-test.c
> index 58f58c2f71..43711049ca 100644
> --- a/tests/qtest/npcm7xx_timer-test.c
> +++ b/tests/qtest/npcm7xx_timer-test.c
> @@ -465,7 +465,6 @@ static void test_periodic_interrupt(gconstpointer test_data)
>       int i;
>   
>       tim_reset(td);
> -    clock_step_next();
>   
>       tim_write_ticr(td, count);
>       tim_write_tcsr(td, CEN | IE | MODE_PERIODIC | PRESCALE(ps));

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>