On 12/12/24 10:01, gerben@altlinux.org wrote:
> From: Denis Rastyogin <gerben@altlinux.org>
>
> Accessing an element of the s->core_registers array,
> which has a size of 236 (0x3AC), may lead to a buffer overflow
> if the 'offset' index exceeds the valid range, potentially
> reaching values up to 5139 (0x504C >> 2). Therefore, the bounds
> check has been extended to DP_CORE_REG_ARRAY_SIZE (0x3B0 >> 2).
> This change addresses a potential vulnerability by ensuring
> the offset stays within the valid range before writing data.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>
> Reported-by: David Meliksetyan <d.meliksetyan@fobos-nt.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Denis Rastyogin <gerben@altlinux.org>
> ---
> hw/display/xlnx_dp.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/display/xlnx_dp.c b/hw/display/xlnx_dp.c
> index 6ab2335499..3f1f5d81bd 100644
> --- a/hw/display/xlnx_dp.c
> +++ b/hw/display/xlnx_dp.c
> @@ -896,7 +896,11 @@ static void xlnx_dp_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t value,
> xlnx_dp_update_irq(s);
> break;
> default:
> - assert(offset <= (0x504C >> 2));
> + /*
> + * Check to ensure the offset is within the bounds of
> + * the core_registers[] array.
> + */
> + assert(offset < DP_CORE_REG_ARRAY_SIZE);
More accurately,
The memory region is registered to match the size of
the core_registers array. The guest cannot issue an
out-of-bounds write.
And that's why this can be an assertion instead of needing
to issue an error to the guest.
r~