target/sparc/win_helper.c | 9 +-------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
Rather than manually copying each register, use
the libc memcpy(), which is well optimized.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
---
Worth renaming as reg8cpy()?
---
target/sparc/win_helper.c | 9 +--------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/sparc/win_helper.c b/target/sparc/win_helper.c
index b53fc9ce940..dab0ff00ccc 100644
--- a/target/sparc/win_helper.c
+++ b/target/sparc/win_helper.c
@@ -26,14 +26,7 @@
static inline void memcpy32(target_ulong *dst, const target_ulong *src)
{
- dst[0] = src[0];
- dst[1] = src[1];
- dst[2] = src[2];
- dst[3] = src[3];
- dst[4] = src[4];
- dst[5] = src[5];
- dst[6] = src[6];
- dst[7] = src[7];
+ memcpy(dst, src, 8 * sizeof(target_ulong));
}
void cpu_set_cwp(CPUSPARCState *env, int new_cwp)
--
2.45.2
On 12/4/24 14:41, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Rather than manually copying each register, use > the libc memcpy(), which is well optimized. > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > --- > Worth renaming as reg8cpy()? > --- > target/sparc/win_helper.c | 9 +-------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target/sparc/win_helper.c b/target/sparc/win_helper.c > index b53fc9ce940..dab0ff00ccc 100644 > --- a/target/sparc/win_helper.c > +++ b/target/sparc/win_helper.c > @@ -26,14 +26,7 @@ > > static inline void memcpy32(target_ulong *dst, const target_ulong *src) > { > - dst[0] = src[0]; > - dst[1] = src[1]; > - dst[2] = src[2]; > - dst[3] = src[3]; > - dst[4] = src[4]; > - dst[5] = src[5]; > - dst[6] = src[6]; > - dst[7] = src[7]; > + memcpy(dst, src, 8 * sizeof(target_ulong)); > } > > void cpu_set_cwp(CPUSPARCState *env, int new_cwp) Once upon a time, calling the libc function was slower. That optimization is probably at least 10 years out of date. I imagine this gets expanded inline as a vector copy these days. Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> I'll agree with Pierrick that we can probably remove the function too. r~
On 12/4/24 12:41, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Rather than manually copying each register, use > the libc memcpy(), which is well optimized. > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > --- > Worth renaming as reg8cpy()? > --- > target/sparc/win_helper.c | 9 +-------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target/sparc/win_helper.c b/target/sparc/win_helper.c > index b53fc9ce940..dab0ff00ccc 100644 > --- a/target/sparc/win_helper.c > +++ b/target/sparc/win_helper.c > @@ -26,14 +26,7 @@ > > static inline void memcpy32(target_ulong *dst, const target_ulong *src) > { > - dst[0] = src[0]; > - dst[1] = src[1]; > - dst[2] = src[2]; > - dst[3] = src[3]; > - dst[4] = src[4]; > - dst[5] = src[5]; > - dst[6] = src[6]; > - dst[7] = src[7]; > + memcpy(dst, src, 8 * sizeof(target_ulong)); > } > > void cpu_set_cwp(CPUSPARCState *env, int new_cwp) Potentially we could go further and just remove the memcpy32 function. Reviewed-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.