From: Kamil Szczęk <kamil@szczek.dev>

There is no need for this assertion here, as we only use vmport value
for equality/inequality checks. This was originally prompted by the
following Coverity report:
 >>> CID 1559533:  Integer handling issues (CONSTANT_EXPRESSION_RESULT)
 >>> "pcms->vmport >= 0" is always true regardless of the values of
 >>> its operands. This occurs as the logical first operand of "&&".

Signed-off-by: Kamil Szczęk <kamil@szczek.dev>
Reported-By: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZwF9ZexNs1h-uC0MrbkgGtMtdyLinROjVSmMNVzNftjGVWgOiuzdD1dSXEtzNH7OHbBFY6GVDYVFIDBgc3lhGqCOb7kaNZolSBkVyl3rNr4=@szczek.dev
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 hw/i386/pc.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
index f9147fecbdc..317aaca25a0 100644
--- a/hw/i386/pc.c
+++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
@@ -1228,7 +1228,6 @@ void pc_basic_device_init(struct PCMachineState *pcms,
         isa_realize_and_unref(pcms->pcspk, isa_bus, &error_fatal);
     }
 
-    assert(pcms->vmport >= 0 && pcms->vmport < ON_OFF_AUTO__MAX);
     if (pcms->vmport == ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO) {
         pcms->vmport = (xen_enabled() || !pcms->i8042_enabled)
             ? ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF : ON_OFF_AUTO_ON;
-- 
2.47.0